But in this poster, the signed Rabbonim say, that no one should consult her because, a) she has no credentials and b) she is "undermining chinuch".
Question: Why was it ok for Weberman, the convicted rapist to be called by Satmar a "therapist" and they defended him, saying that he was a "therapist" even though he had a zero credentials, but it is not ok for her to be a "therapist" when she has the same credentials as Weberman!
How much "undermining chinuch" did Weberman do when he burned his victims' stomach for his own sadistical desires?
2 comments:
Hatzad Hashova is that you have to be on the side of the powerful so called askanim. They managed to embarrass a women brabim for nothing other then being on the wrong of end of a deranged mother that abuses her children physically and emotionally.
It's the Fox in action
Post a Comment