DUS IZ NIES
“I don’t speak because I have the power to speak; I speak because I don’t have the power to remain silent.” Rav Kook z"l
Sunday, November 1, 2026
Could the Fiercely Anti-Zionist Rabbis Have Misunderstood God's Plan for Israel?
The New York Times Distorts the Record on Israel’s Founding in 1948
The New York Times recently published an erroneous claim regarding the 1948 War and the making of the Palestinian refugee problem. In an Oct. 5, 2026, guest essay entitled “AIPAC Has Failed,” Eric Alterman writes:
The US State Department consistently tried to pressure Israel to take a more generous attitude toward the roughly 750,000 Palestinians it had expelled before and during its war of independence — what Palestinians call the Nakba, or “catastrophe.” [Emphasis Added]
That all 750,000 Palestinians were expelled, as opposed to fled, is an inaccurate claim.
Many researchers, including both Israeli and Palestinian historians, have demonstrated this. Moreover, multiple media outlets, including Agence France Presse, Guardian, and Reuters Arabic have previously corrected the identical error.
Benny Morris, a top historian on the subject, notes that the refugee problem was created out of war, not out of some grand Israeli master plan. There were some limited expulsions of Arabs by Israeli forces, but many Arabs fled out of fear and uncertainty that war causes. Aside from Israeli actions and intentions, Morris writes:
It is also worth remembering that a large proportion of those [Palestinians] who became refugees fled their towns and villages not under direct Israeli threat or duress. Tens of thousands – mostly from well-to-do and elite families – left the towns in the war’s early months because of the withdrawal of the British administration, the war-filled chaos that followed, and the prospect of Jewish rule. And, in the following months, hundreds of thousands fled not under Jewish orders or direct coercion though, to be sure, most sought to move out of harm’s way as Zionist troops conquered town after town and district after district. And most probably believed that they would be returning home in a matter of months if not weeks, perhaps after the Arab armies had crushed Israel.
Morris’s work is highly influential and other historians have echoed it.
The scale of the Palestinian departure had taken Israeli leaders, including hardliners, by surprise. Despite whatever attitudes they had towards the Arabs, “Palestinian flight during the first stage of the war left the Israelis aghast,” as Israeli historian Anita Shapira recounts. To Israelis, the events were simply unfathomable.
Detractors would point out that Israel activated Plan D/Tochnit Dalet around April and May of 1948. It called for the Israeli forces to conquer Arab villages. Expulsion and destruction of villages was to take place only if the inhabitants and whichever fighting forces residing among them would resist, unless they surrendered.
Morris writes, “Townspeople and villagers usually fled their homes before or during battle and Haganah commanders rarely had to decide about, or issue, expulsion orders.”
Even when Plan D was in effect, “mass exodus of the Arabs was neither intended nor expected by either the Arabs or the Jews.” There is no evidence of a master Israeli plan for mass expulsion of Arabs and Plan D never was an official decision of any Israeli body.
Furthermore, by the time Israel activated Plan D, at least 70,000-75,000 Palestinians, often belonging to urban elite circles, had left the country in fear of the oncoming conflict and in the hope of returning to a calmer Palestine.” This mass departure, taking place between September 1947 and March 1948, produced even more anxiety and insecurity among the Palestinian population that already seeing the fighting and the withdrawal of the British rule. The situation was chaotic. It is no wonder why many others followed the elites and left in the following months.
But it is not accurate that Israel expelled all the refugees. This argument ignores the realities of war and the twilight of British rule. The Times should correct the article. The outlet did not respond to a correction request and a follow up email from CAMERA.
Omri Tubi is a US media research analyst for CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis), where a version of this article appeared.
Israel plotting another ‘Operation Grim Beeper’ style attack
The Iran War may kick into high gear after the midterms, as a third aircraft carrier is headed to the region and President Trump has warned all hell could break loose.
The USS Theodore Roosevelt, a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, was making its way to the Middle East – joining two other carrier task forces in the region, the USS George Washington and the USS George W. Bush.
President Trump told Kansas City radio station KCMO Friday that the war is “going to get wrapped up soon” – without specifying how.
What Britain owe the Jewish People
Saturday, October 31, 2026
Rav Dov Landau In$tructed Degel HaTorah To Explore Alliance With Ei$enkot
Charedie will sit with Nazis if that's what's needed to get money to the Moisdois Which is Inyani De"yomeh as the letters מוסד are the same as סדום!
Eisenkot is debating whether he should sit with the Arabs or sit with Charedim! This in itself should startle any reasonable person, but the Charedie Gedoilim, like the Arabs do not recognize the State and consider the entire Knesset as a bunch of "meenim & apikorsim" but will sit there anyway as a means to drain the system! As of now MK Yaakov A$her denied it .....
A dramatic report suggesting that Degel HaTorah could consider joining forces with the center-left bloc led by Gadi Eisenkot has triggered a political controversy in Israel, with senior United Torah Judaism officials quickly denying that any such instructions were issued.
Yishai Cohen, political editor of Kikar HaShabbat and a panelist on Channel 12, reported Friday that HaGaon HaRav Dov Landau had instructed Degel HaTorah’s Knesset representatives to open discussions with the so-called “change bloc” as Israel’s political parties explore possible coalition arrangements following this week’s elections.
According to Cohen’s report, Degel HaTorah does not consider itself automatically committed to either the Netanyahu bloc or the opposition, with the overriding priority being the protection of yeshiva bochurim and the resolution of the ongoing military draft crisis.
The report raised the possibility that Degel HaTorah could consider cooperation with Eisenkot if his bloc agreed to the party’s demands regarding the status of Bnei Yeshivos.
Such a move would represent a significant development in Israeli coalition politics, potentially challenging the longstanding political alignment between the Chareidi parties and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s right-wing bloc.
However, the office of United Torah Judaism MK Yaakov Asher, a senior Degel HaTorah representative, moved quickly to reject the report.
“No such instruction was given. We have not even visited the Gedolei Yisroel since the elections,” Asher’s office said in a statement.
The denial directly contradicts the claim that Rav Landau had already issued instructions to begin negotiations with the opposition.
The controversy comes as Israel’s political parties assess the final election results and the prospects for forming a government.
With neither major political bloc holding a straightforward path to a governing majority, the Chareidi parties could play a pivotal role in determining the composition of the next coalition.
The military draft issue remains one of the most significant obstacles in coalition negotiations, particularly following months of arrests of yeshiva bochurim and growing outrage throughout the Chareidi community.
For Degel HaTorah, securing protections for Bnei Yeshivos and ensuring the continued ability of bochurim and avreichim to learn Torah without facing military prosecution remain central political demands.
Friday, October 30, 2026
Thursday, October 29, 2026
Analysis of the Israeli election 2026
New York, May 10, 1933 New Yorkers marched through Manhattan to protest Nazi persecution in Germany.
New York, May 10, 1933
New Yorkers marched through Manhattan to protest Nazi persecution in Germany.
The march was organized by the American Jewish Congress. Rabbis, war veterans and other demonstrators passed City Hall as the city watched.









