To those fleeing Texas Democrats that say that they are saving democracy in Texas and the United States relative to congressional redistricting, here are the facts:
— David Spiller (@DavidSpillerTX) August 9, 2025
MA: 36% Republican, 0 seats
CT: 42% Republican, 0 seats
ME: 46% Republican, 0 seats
NM: 46% Republican, 0 seats…
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 11, 2025
Do you wonder why the world is crumbling before your eyes and rather than fight for it people are falling for its propaganda?
— dahlia kurtz ✡︎ דליה קורץ (@DahliaKurtz) August 9, 2025
It doesn't get better than Melanie Phillips' spot-on explanation.
It's videos like this that make a difference. Learn it. Share it. Repeat. pic.twitter.com/Kg2nVLHQuF
When ISIS took over, I began secretly documenting their atrocities under the name Mosul Eye. I watched as my neighbors became enemies, as public spaces turned into execution grounds, and as fear seeped into every aspect of life.
Extremism didn’t arrive with guns and black flags. It first crept in as whispers in sermons, then as slogans, and eventually as checkpoints, arrests, and executions. By the time the world called it what it was—terrorism—it was too late.
But that’s how hate works. It doesn’t begin with violence; it starts with the normalization of dangerous ideas—ideas categorized by many as “opinions.” And we’re seeing that same pattern now in the United States.
But what happens when that “opinion” denies the humanity of an entire people? When it rewrites their history, questions their identity, or suggests they don’t have a right to exist? What happens when that opinion becomes a slogan, then a movement, and then a firebomb thrown at a synagogue?
In May, two Israeli diplomats were shot outside Washington, DC’s Capital Jewish Museum. Their attacker claimed he acted in solidarity with Gaza. A few weeks later, a Holocaust survivor sustained fatal injuries during a terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, when a man with Molotov cocktails attacked a peaceful march for Israeli hostages. In both cases, the suspects didn’t see themselves as extremists. They thought they were standing for something righteous.
And that’s the danger. Because the line between opinion and extremism is thinner than people want to admit. Antisemitism adapts; it speaks the language of justice, of culture, of protest. And when no one challenges it, it becomes accepted, and then eventually deadly.
BREAKING: Special Prosecutor Ed Martin now has the most documented mortgage fraud case in modern political history
— Sam E. Antar (@SamAntar) August 9, 2025
READ THE COMPLETE ROADMAP TO CONVICTION:
➡️https://t.co/fnsA50FmWb
Letitia James ran a 40-YEAR CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE while serving as NY's top prosecutor:
BROOKLYN… pic.twitter.com/Itu4jlZfHw
Journalist Daniel Grobais of Galei Tzahal reported that a contingent from the Peleg Yerushalmi also arrived at the scene. This group, which has been demonstrating against the draft for over a decade, attempted to persuade the chassidic protesters to try to break into the prison, but the area was heavily guarded with strong security measures in place.
Among those present were avreichim from Beitar Illit,a city which is in second place in Israel of having the most poverty and had received direct instructions from the Rebbe to go and demonstrate in solidarity with the young men imprisoned in the military facility.
The Rebbe of Shevet HaLevi traveled from Bnei Brak to the protest, where he led tefillos and delivered words of encouragement on behalf of the detainees and in opposition to the draft decree.
Protesters, joined by members of the Peleg Yerushalmi, chanted together, “Ha’achim Yitzchakov, kulanu itchem” (“Brothers Yitzchakov, we are all with you”). The gathering also saw spirited singing and dancing to the chants “B’shilton hakofrim ein anachnu ma’aminim” (“We do not believe in the rule of the heretics”) and “Utzu eitza v’sufar.
Organizers vowed that this was only the beginning of a larger protest movement that will galvanize the entire chareidi public, declaring that they will not allow yeshiva students to be imprisoned for the “crime” of learning Torah.
On Sunday, August 3, major media outlets amplified a distorted Palestinian narrative about Jerusalem’s Temple Mount — Judaism’s holiest site — in a way that did more than just misinform. It helped legitimize the very rhetoric used by Hamas to justify its October 7, 2023 massacre.
From factual errors to sensationalism, the coverage of Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir’s brief visit to the Al-Aqsa compound on Tisha B’Av — the Jewish day of mourning for the destruction of the ancient Temples — was painted as a dangerous provocation, a spark threatening to ignite further regional instability.
This is more than bad reporting. It’s complicity in a lie that kills.
While Jewish prayer at the site — the third holiest for Muslims — is forbidden, any outlet that paints such a non-violent act as dangerous automatically adopts the point of view of the real extremists, forgetting that such coverage fuels terrorist propaganda.
Compound Vs. Mosque
Outlets like The Guardian and The Times of London suggested Ben-Gvir had literally entered the Al-Aqsa Mosque and prayed inside.
He didn’t.\
