“I don’t speak because I have the power to speak; I speak because I don’t have the power to remain silent.” Rav Kook z"l

Thursday, April 16, 2015

Moshe Yitzchok Greenfeld's Body Recovered in London after Drowning!




Rescue personal and divers on the scene (London Fire Brigade)Rescue personal and divers on the scene (London Fire Brigade)
London – Divers have recovered the body of 19 year old Moshe Yitzchok Greefeld who drowned in Hampstead Heath in London Wednesday evening.
Witnesses say the boy was swimming in an area not designated for swimming and called for help before going under water. The boys clothes were found earlier today near where he went swimming.
Police have brought in divers to go underwater to search for the body.
Hatzalah, Emergency teams were on scene, including six fire crews and 30 firefighters. 
Rescue personal and divers on the scene (London Fire Brigade)Rescue personal and divers on the scene (London Fire Brigade)

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Rebbitzen Wosner: The Picture You Will Never See!

Nope! You won 't see it in the Yated, you won't see it in Der Yid, Der Blatt, Dee Zeitung, the Anti-Jewish Ami, or even in the MIshpacha!
This beautiful picture of Rav Wosner z"l sitting with his Rebbitzin on a bench, you will not see anywhere except on the "Tumedika" Blogs!


Monday, April 13, 2015

Jews in WW1, fought for Germany, France, Hungary, Austria, Italy, Belgium, and then got their butts kicked in!



Between two world wars


A hundred years ago, one of the most terrible wars the world has known was raging. 

For the first time in their history, the Jews -- about a million and a half of them -- actively took part in a war that belonged mainly in the Christian world. 

Some of them charged eagerly toward the front lines, volunteering to fight with zeal.

In 1961, the German army, the Bundeswehr, published a book called "War Letters of Fallen German Jews." Franz Josef Strauss, then West Germany's defense minister, recognized the Jewish contribution to the war effort in the book's preface: "These letters reveal a patriotism that has since been lost. More than this, the Jewish soldiers' letters from the front exhibit a profound love of their homeland that nowadays is no longer understood."

Indeed, the Jews fighting in the First World War were devoted to their homelands, whether Germany, France, Hungary, Austria, Italy, Belgium, or elsewhere. Preserved old photos show Jewish soldiers guided by military rabbis, mostly Orthodox, on both sides of the front praying in makeshift synagogues or outdoors for the defeat of their enemies, including the Jewish ones.

Zionism was not part of these patriotic Jewish fighters' experience. The Zionist movement had just begun to develop mainly in the extremely anti-Semitic Russian empire. 

However, in central and western Europe most Jews had not heard about it and those who had ignored and scorned it. 

Their loyalty was devoted solely to their country of residence.
World War I was an unexpected historical opportunity for European Jews to prove loyalty to their "homelands" and thereby assimilate into the societies they longed to be a part of. 
Until then, the 19th century Jewish emancipation in central and western Europe had only seen the legal recognition of Jews as equal citizens, but socially they were still perceived as foreigners.

Their ardent sacrifice in the war was supposed to fundamentally change that perception and allow the integration of the Jews into their Christian surroundings.

We all know what happened just little over 20 years later. 

Those patriotic Jewish fighters were forced to flee their so called "homelands" to save their lives from the ruthless Nazi regime that persecuted them. 

Those Jews who fought valiantly in World War I but were unable to escape the Nazis, including amputees and decorated heroes, were led to the gas chambers along with their families and medals.

World War I was a key event in the Jewish nation's history, not only for the many lives lost in it, but because it changed the Jews' perception and world views. It led to the Balfour Declaration and the end of Ottoman rule in pre-state Israel. Yet, its importance has been forgotten from the heart.
Avi Primor is an Israeli columnist and former ambassador to Germany, and the director of the Center for European Studies at Tel Aviv University.

Shepard Smith: FOX News’ Anti-Israel Anchor Blocks Blogger on Twitter for Defending Israel

Debbie Schlussel

By Debbie Schlussel
FOX News’ openly anti-Israel anchor, Shepard Smith, blocked me on Twitter for defending Israel. That’s despite the fact that as a not-so-closeted gay man, Israel is the only place where he’d live to see another day. I pointed that out after he attacked Israel on Twitter, so he blocked me. 

Why confuse people with the facts, though, and get in the way of Smith’s Jew-hatred? 

He loves the Muslims, regardless of the fact that they’d cut off his penis and shove it in his mouth (as they’ve done to the dead bodies of many gays–and straight men, too). And he hates Israel. 

I have to laugh anytime anyone tells me how “pro-Israel” FOX News is when the network has some of the most anti-Israel personalities on American TV. And Smith is Exhibit A (Exhibit B is FOX News Senior Correspondent Carl Cameron, an Israel-loather who reported on FOX News after 9/11 that Israeli illegal alien “artists” were behind 9/11). 

Smith isn’t just an anchor and reporter at FOX News, he’s also the director of its “Breaking News Division,” so you can assume all of FOX’s breaking news is filtered through his anti-Israel lens.

As I’ve told you , David Shepard Smith, Jr. a/k/a Shepard Smith likes Israel as much as he’s known to like women: not at all. 

He’s gone out of his way to defame the Jewish State. On FOX News, he and his anti-Israel buddy and fellow FOX News-er Judith Miller compared Israel to Cuba but came to the conclusion that Israel is “worse than Cuba.” 

And on the network, he’s been repeatedly critical of Israel, using every single irrelevant opportunity to attack the state. 

When ISIS released the video of the terrorist group burning the captured Jordanian pilot alive in a cage, he blamed Israel. The day after the video was released, Smith traveled to Jordan where he repeatedly filed reports, telling fellow FOX News anchors and contributors, including the cast of “The Five,” that the reason the Jordanians were angry over the burnt-alive pilot was that “they are angry over U.S. policy towards Israel and they are angry at the way Israel treats the Palestinians,” as if that had a thing to do with ISIS’ incineration of the pilot or the price of tea in China. Not one of the FOX News anchors or personalities, including the boobs on “The Five” said anything in response or disagreement. Nothing. Yeah, that’s “pro-Israel”.

As we all know, ISIS brutally tortured and murdered the pilot because ISIS opposes any forces fighting it and/or bombing it and any parties who are not strict Sunni Muslims according to Muslim orthodoxy. Israel ain’t got a thing to do with it. Israel was never mentioned in the video or any statements ISIS released regarding why it murdered the pilot. 

But Shepard Smith doesn’t care about that and all “news” or “reports” you hear from him on FOX News should be taken with a grain of salt because he lets his far-left agenda get in the way of the facts. Sometimes violently so, as when he deliberately ran over a woman because he wanted her parking space during the Bush-Gore recount in Florida in 2000 (and was criminally charged for it–but he got away with a slap-on-the-hand plea deal).

The thing is, it is one of the worst kept secrets at FOX News that Shepard Smith is known to be gay. I am told he wanted to come out but FOX News opposed it in the past (maybe they’ll allow it, now, because they care about polls and trends, not about conservatism). 

And, as a gay man, if he were not a FOX News “reporter” and “anchor” and traveled to any Muslim country, he would be lawfully executed. Homosexuality is forbidden and punished with death in Islam and in every single Muslim country on the planet. The only place in the Middle East where Shepard Smith could safely live as a gay man is in Israel. In fact, as a gay man in Israel, he’d have more rights than as a gay man in America, even in New York City. (Maybe he feels a kinship with late, gay PLO leader Yasser Arafat?)

Toward the end of March, Smith tweeted in favor of Barack Obama’s statements against Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu regarding a Palestinian State. A few of my Twitter followers referred me to Shep’s tweet, and I responded that it’s interesting he so hates the only place in the Middle East where gays like him have any rights (including, again, the right to live for another day). I tweeted a few things in this regard, and my followers retweeted them. He couldn't handle the truth and let his Israel-hatred blind him. So, he blocked me, a badge of honor for me.
When I tweeted about this, I got a lot of responses, almost all of them favorable. People who are actually paying attention know what this guy is about: pure, unabashed liberalism. Accurate news coverage has nothing to do with him and he with it.

So, the next time you hear FOX News blare one of its slogans, “Fair and Balanced,” or “We Report, You Decide,” think about Shepard Smith blaming ISIS’ torture-murder of the Jordanian pilot on Israel and recognize that there is no fairness, no balance, and the deciding has already been done for you.
As for reporting, well, it’s no different than the typical anti-Israel crap you see on any other news program. Only, worse.

Shepard Smith & Judith Miller Attack Israel, Compare to Cuba – Posted w/ Approval & Praise for FOX News By George Soros’ Anti-Israel Media Matters . . .


The Iran Irony: The US is Lying and Iran is Telling the Truth about the Iran Nuclear Agreement!



I can’t imagine what it’s like when the top editors at The New York Times get together to further glorify Obama at the expense of Israel, only to find themselves a laughingstock.


Or maybe I can:


Tom Friedman: “We made a mistake.”

“Mistake? We’re Liberals. We never make mistakes. Friedman, you’re fired.”


If only…


What happened? 

On Wednesday the wizards at the Times’ “editorial board” 
sought ways to put lipstick on a pig to sell it as kosher. 

The editorial, written under the spell of gobbledygook, declared that the Iran Nuke agreements were a win for the United States over the ayatollahs and that Israel ought to know better than to second-guess President Obama.

So shut up, the Times explained. We know what’s good. Iran has agreed to everything, even the gradual lifting of sanctions.


But oops, the next day it was a different story, literally. 

The Times had to retract, without saying so, of course. 

Iran’s supreme leader rushed to twitter to say that NOTHING from Obama’s fact sheet is true and indeed, the sanctions are to be liftedimmediately.


Quite a fix if you are The New York Times and got caught being stupid. 

So on Thursday, the Times admitted, “the truth depends on who’s talking.”


So we’re left with a terribly sad conclusion. If you seek the truth, listen to the ayatollahs.

The government of the United States  “lies, deceives” and has “devilish intentions.” Who says so? Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.


Him you can believe.


One thing he’s not is a Liberal. Liberals have a bad habit of fabricating to fit a specific point of view. The Times does it every day. Rolling Stonemagazine does it every other day, on going after Israel with falsehoods or reporting as fact a rape that never happened at the University of Virginia.

The Liberal agenda must be served no matter who gets hurt or whose reputation gets tarnished, like Harry Reid’s whopper about Mitt Romney.


But politicians are not expected to be truthful. 

That’s why we invented journalists.  “Journalists are assigned to be the flies on the walls of civilization in order to alert us to the intrigues being whispered in dark corners,” a quote from the newsroom drama The Bathsheba Deadline
.

There has never been a time in America when journalism has failed so miserably. Tom Friedman illustrates the point with his THREE Pulitzer prizes.


In general terms, never before has news been delivered so one-sided from print to broadcast.

Never before has journalism been so wedded to a specific ideology, so that we are fed a constant diet of mendacity and disinformation.

Go – ask the ayatollahs.

It’s a sad day when we have to turn to tyrannical regimes for news we can trust.


Jack Engelhard writes a regular column for Arutz Sheva. The new thriller from the New York-based novelist, The Bathsheba Deadline, a heroic editor’s singlehanded war on terror and against media bias. Engelhard wrote the int’l bestseller Indecent Proposal that was translated into more than 22 languages and turned into a Paramount motion picture starring Robert Redford and Demi Moore. Website: www.jackengelhard.com

Is a Plane Seat Next to a Woman Against the Orthodox Faith?



Francesca Hogi, 40, had settled into her aisle seat for the flight from New York to London when the man assigned to the adjoining window seat arrived and refused to sit down. He said his religion prevented him from sitting beside a woman who was not his wife. Irritated but eager to get underway, she eventually agreed to move.


Laura Heywood, 42, had a similar experience while traveling from San Diego to London via New York. She was in a middle seat — her husband had the aisle — when the man with the window seat in the same row asked if the couple would switch positions. Ms. Heywood, offended by the notion that her sex made her an unacceptable seatmate, refused.

“I wasn’t rude, but I found the reason to be sexist, so I was direct,” she said.

A growing number of airline passengers, particularly on trips between the United States and Israel, are now sharing stories of conflicts between ultra-Orthodox Jewish men trying to follow their faith and women just hoping to sit down. Several flights from New York to Israel over the last year have been delayed or disrupted over the issue, and with social media spreading outrage and debate, the disputes have spawned a protest initiative, an online petition and a spoof safety video from a Jewish magazine suggesting a full-body safety vest (“Yes, it’s kosher!”) to protect ultra-Orthodox men from women seated next to them on airplanes.
Francesca Hogi, while traveling from New York to London, agreed to change seats when an ultra-Orthodox Jewish man refused to sit next to her. 
Some passengers say they have found the seat-change requests simply surprising or confusing. But in many cases, the issue has exposed and amplified tensions between different strains of Judaism.

“I grew up Conservative, and I’m sympathetic to Orthodox Jews,” he said. “But this Hasid came on, looking very uncomfortable, and wouldn’t even talk to the woman, and there was five to eight minutes of ‘What’s going to happen?’ before the woman acquiesced and said, ‘I’ll move.’ It felt like he was being a yutz,” Mr. Newberger added, using a Yiddish word for fool.

Jeremy Newberger, 41, a documentary filmmaker who witnessed such an episode on a Delta flight from New York to Israel, was among several Jewish passengers who were offended.

Representatives of the ultra-Orthodox insist that the behavior is anomalous and rare.

“I think that the phenomenon is nowhere near as prevalent as some media reports have made it seem,” said Rabbi Avi Shafran, director of public affairs at Agudath Israel of America, which represents ultra-Orthodox Jews. Rabbi Shafran noted that despite religious laws that prohibit physical contact between Jewish men and women who are not their wives, many ultra-Orthodox men follow the guidance of an eminent Orthodox scholar, Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, who counseled that it was acceptable for a Jewish man to sit next to a woman on a subway or bus so long as there was no intention to seek sexual pleasure from any incidental contact.

“The haredi men I know,” Rabbi Shafran said, using the Hebrew word for the ultra-Orthodox, “have no objection to sitting next to a woman on any flight.”

But multiple travelers, scholars and the airlines themselves say the phenomenon is real. The number of episodes appears to be increasing as ultra-Orthodox communities grow in number and confidence, but also as other passengers, for reasons of comfort as well as politics, push back.

“It’s very common,” said Rabbi Yehudah Mirsky, an associate professor of Judaic studies at Brandeis University. “Multiculturalism creates a moral language where a group can say, ‘You have to respect my values.’ ”

Anat Hoffman, the executive director of the Israel Religious Action Center, which has started a campaign urging women not to give up their seats, said, “I have a hundred stories.”
Photo
While traveling from San Diego to London via New York, Laura Heywood refused to move so that her husband, Steven Soden, would not have to give up his aisle seat. “I wasn’t going to put his comfort for no good reason above my husband’s,” she said of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish man who had asked her to change seats. Credit
And Rabbi Ysoscher Katz, a Modern Orthodox Talmud scholar who grew up in the ultra-Orthodox Satmar sect, said, “When I was still part of that community, and on the more conservative side, I would make every effort I could not to sit next to a woman on the plane, because of a fear that you might touch a woman by accident.”
Airlines, and flight attendants, are often caught in the middle. Morgan Durrant, a Delta Air Lines spokesman, acknowledged
the phenomenon, saying: “This is a dynamic of some customers who utilize our service. We’re aware of it, and we do what we can to get ahead of it prior to boarding.”

Other airlines had little to say about the situation, other than to agree that a variety of passengers make a variety of requests when traveling, and that carriers try to accommodate them.

It is not an entirely new issue; some ultra-Orthodox travelers have tried to avoid mixed-sex seating for years. But now the ultra-Orthodox Jewish population is growing rapidly because of high birthrates. Ultra-Orthodox men and their families now make up a larger share of airline travelers to Israel and other locations, giving them more economic clout with airlines,  and they are making their views more widely known in response to what they see as the sexualization of society.

The issues on airplanes echo controversies over efforts to separate men and women on buses and streets, as well as to remove women from somenews photographs.

“The ultra-Orthodox have increasingly seen gender separation as a kind of litmus test of Orthodoxy — it wasn’t always that way, but it has become that way,” said Samuel Heilman, a professor of sociology at Queens College. “There is an ongoing culture war between these people and the rest of the modern world, and because the modern world has increasingly sought to become gender neutral, that has added to the desire to say, ‘We’re not like that.’”

Some passengers are sympathetic. Hamilton Morris, 27, a journalist from Brooklyn, said he agreed to give up his seat on a flight from Los Angeles to Newark via Chicago because it seemed like the considerate thing to do.

“There was a Hasidic Jew sitting across the aisle, between two women, and a stewardess approached me and quietly asked if I would be willing to exchange seats because the Hasidic Jew was uncomfortable sitting between two women,” he said. “I was fine with that. Everyone was trying to be accommodating because on airplanes everyone is anxious about offending anyone for religious reasons.”

And yet Ms. Heywood, a paralegal from Chula Vista, Calif., said she declined to give up her seat for reasons of both politics and seat preference — her husband finds flying less stressful in aisle seats. “I wasn’t going to put his comfort for no good reason above my husband’s,” she said.

Other passengers, like Andrew Roffe, 31, a writer based in Los Angeles, said he and a friend wound up debating the ethics of the situation after Mr. Roffe described his experience on a United Airlines flight to Chicago. When passengers started to board, he said, an ultra-Orthodox man stood in the aisle, refusing to move and delaying the departure for 15 to 20 minutes until another passenger volunteered to switch seats.

“My buddy who is Orthodox was saying this is a traditional thing — he doesn’t want to be tempted when his wife wasn’t there. And I said, ‘Are you kidding?’ This was just some woman flying to work or home and minding her own business.”

Sunday, April 12, 2015

A Breakdown of every scandal swirling around Hillary

Expected to announce her presidential run today , Hillary Clinton has been attempting to re-brand herself: She’s Hillary 2.0, campaigning out of Brooklyn, a more accessible, relatable candidate who learned the lessons of her bruising, failed 2008 bid: From now on, no equivocating, no entitlement, no dubious financial dealings.
How much has changed?

The Shady Foundation

Modal Trigger
Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton at an event for the family foundation.Photo: Reuters
Founded in 2001 as The Clinton Foundation and renamed the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation in 2013, this ostensible philanthropic concern has become a liability.
As reported by the International Business Times last week, while serving as secretary of state, Clinton was lobbied by human-rights groups and union leaders to address the Colombian government’s abuse of striking oil workers, some of whom had been threatened at gunpoint by the military. Meanwhile, the oil company in question, Pacific Rubiales, was promising millions to the Clinton Foundation.
Hillary’s State Department wound up publicly hailing Colombia’s commitment to human-rights reform — and that statement allowed the United States to continue funding the Colombian military.
Today, the founder of Pacific Rubiales is a board member of the Clinton Foundation.
And as Politico reported last week, a major phosphate company owned by the Moroccan government has just pledged at least $1 million to the foundation. In 2011, Clinton’s State Department assailed Morocco as a corrupt state guilty of “arbitrary arrests and corruption in all branches of government.” Women in Morocco are still subjugated by Islamic rule, yet last September, Hillary Clinton’s public stance on the government had changed.
“A vital hub for economic and cultural exchange,” she called it, one that was “in the midst of dramatic changes.”
The foundation had stopped accepting money from foreign governments in 2009, when Hillary became secretary of state. When she resigned in 2013, the foundation changed this policy, and it has since taken money from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Oman.

The Spotty Resume

Modal Trigger
Hillary sworn in as the new Democratic senator from New York in 2001 with Bill, Chelsea and former president Al Gore.Photo: Reuters
Hillary served as US senator from New York from 2001 to 2009, but her accomplishments are thin. No piece of legislation bears her name. Her tenure came to be defined in the 2008 presidential primaries by her vote for the war in Iraq — which Obama, who had opposed the war, used to chip away at her foreign-policy bona fides.
Her accomplishments as secretary of state are as unclear. She traveled to 112 countries, but again, she has nothing of consequence to her name: no peace treaty, no accord, no summit of consequence. Her defenders say that she helped restore America’s reputation in the wake of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; critics say she was too afraid to make a mistake that would affect her presidential run in 2016.
When asked in 2014 by Diane Sawyer to name her greatest achievement or “signature doctrine,” Hillary could not. “We haven’t had a doctrine since containment worked with the Soviet Union,” she said. “But we’ve had presidents who’ve made some tough calls and some hard choices, some of which have worked, and some of which have not.”

The Suspicious Finances

Modal Trigger
Photo: Shutterstock
Without ever breaking any laws, the Clintons have long appeared to be reaping ill-gotten gains. Right before Bill was elected governor of Arkansas, family friend James Blair, who also worked as a lawyer for Tyson Foods, helped her turn $12,000 worth of stock — Hillary only had $1,000 in her account at the time — into a near-immediate $100,000 profit. She did not disclose this until her husband’s second year in office.
It was during Bill’s first run for president, in 1992, that the Whitewater scandal surfaced. In the 1970s and ’80s, the Clintons and their friends Jim and Susan McDougal had invested in the Whitewater Development Corp.; it was alleged that Clinton, as governor, had pressured a local S&L to loan Susan McDougal $300,000 for real-estate investments with the company, and that transactions between an Arkansas bank and Bill Clinton had been concealed.
Neither Clinton was charged, though both McDougals and Gov. Jim Guy Tucker, who served as governor after Clinton, were convicted of fraud.

The Spectacular Greed

Modal Trigger
The Clinton’s home in Chappaqua, New York.Photo: AP
Clinton will likely position herself as the champion of the middle class. Yet in 2014, it was revealed that Clinton, who charges a minimum of $300,000 per speech, also had an extensive list of demands.
Most anyone who hires Hillary to speak must also provide a private jet — a $39 million Gulfstream G450 or better — and put her up in presidential suites. Her standard agreement requires her presence for only 90 minutes, and 50 photos with 100 attendees — no more.
Hillary has defended her enormous speaking fees by saying she and Bill were “not only dead broke, but in debt” when they left the White House.
In 1999, Bill and Hillary bought their house in Chappaqua for $1.7 million, and in 2000 purchased a seven-bedroom in Washington, DC, for $2.85 million. Hillary’s Senate financial disclosure form that year listed their assets at $1.8 million.
In Clintonian fashion, Hillary backed off the “dead broke” statement — sort of. “I regret it. It was inartful,” she said. “But it was accurate.”

The Other Women

Modal Trigger
Monica Lewinsky and Bill circa 1998 in the White House.Photo: ZumaPress
One of the great lessons of 2008, say Hillary’s aides, is that she has learned to run toward history, not from it: Instead of downplaying her gender, she’ll amplify it, running not just as the potential first female president but as a proud feminist.
Modal Trigger
Juanita BroaddrickPhoto: NBC
If so, she may create a new problem for herself: How to explain her decades-long defense of her womanizing husband — a philanderer at best, a predator at worst? In 2014, the papers of Hillary’s late friend Diane Blair were made public; in them, Blair wrote that Hillary dismissed Monica Lewinksy, then a 22-year-old White House intern, as a “narcissistic loony-toon” and insisted that Bill had not abused his power.
As for Bill’s other women — including Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey, who alleged sexual harassment, and Juanita Broad­drick, who accused him of rape — the Clintons often embarked on a “nuts and sluts” campaign, denigrating the accusers.
According to Carl Bernstein’s “A Woman in Charge,” Hillary called Bill’s longtime mistress Gennifer Flowers “trailer trash”; she also encouraged his team to get signed statements from all of Bill’s other women, swearing they’d never had sex with him.
Willey later said that Hillary spearheaded a “terror campaign” against her. “She is the war on women, as far as I’m concerned,” Willey said.

The Secret E-Mails

Modal Trigger
Photo: AP
In March, we learned that during her four-year stint as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton conducted all business — political, public, and private — solely through her personal e-mail account, on a server in her house.
When asked why she didn’t use two e-mails, one for official business and one for personal use, Hillary said: “I thought it would be easier to just carry one device for my work and for my personal e-mails instead of two.”
Then an e-mail surfaced that was sent from her iPad, undermining that excuse.
In a press conference to address the controversy, Clinton answered questions with all-too-familiar arrogance, contempt and incredulity that her word should be questioned.
“She came off as defensive and artificially put-off,” one Democratic strategist told New York magazine.
“I’m a huge Hillary Clinton fan,” said another. “But after that press conference, I do have major concerns about her ability as a campaigner and to get elected.”