Tosher Rebbe the holy tzaadik succumbs to his illness at 95

Rabbi Meshulem Feish Lowy, the Tosher Rebbe, known for his magnetic personality and an ever present aura of holiness, died today at the age of 95.

The Rebbe was born in Demetch, Hungary and was the son of the Grand Rebbe Rabbi Mordechai Segal Lowy, the third rebbe in the Tosher dynasty which had strong links to the Chozeh of Lublin, Reb Elimilech of Lizhensk, the Magid of Mizritch and the Baal Shem Tov.  According to one source, the Tosher Rebbe was able to trace his patrilineal ancestors all the way back to Rashi.

A Holocaust survivor who served in the Hungarian Labour Service before being liberated by the Red Army in 1944, Rabbi Lowy was proclaimed the new Tosher Rebbe by his father’s surviving Chasidim. 

The Rebbe first settled in Nyiregyhaza in northeast Hungary, and married his wife Chava Weingarten, a direct descendant of the Noam Elimilech in 1946.  Fearful of the nearby Communist government, the Rebbe and his Chasidim relocated to Montreal in 1951, establishing Kiryas Tosh in Boisbriand, Quebec in 1963.  The first Tasher Rebbetzin passed away in 1996 and the Rebbe remarried in 2007.

A 1966 article in the Canadian Jewish News by Norman Abrahams described the Tosher Rebbe’s dedication to his followers, many of whom were Holocaust survivors who turned to the Rebbe for guidance.

“Indicative of the Rebbe’s devotion to Judaism and his followers, this great man stays up most of the night fulfilling the many requests for advice and prayer and it is not uncommon to see him eating breakfast, his first meal of the day at five o’clock in the afternoon.”

A Talmudic expert, the Rebbe was incredibly knowledgeable in many other areas, frequently offering medical advice and guidance on other topics.

“His wisdom extends to other fields, particularly those of politics and law,” wrote Abrahams. “It is said that even lawyers come to him for advice.”

Renowned for his insistence to read from the Torah on his own for over 50 years, the Rebbe would complete the entire Sefer Tehillim daily and could stand in shul for over five hours, according to Israeli news site Kikar HaShabbat.

Over the past five decades, Tosh became a destination for those seeking spiritual counsel, advice and brachos, with thousands coming every year from all walks of life to seek out the Tosher Rebbe’s guidance. 

A six volume set titled Avodas Avodah features the Rebbe’s discussions of the parsha, yomtim tovim and other insights, in both Yiddish and Hebrew, as well as a Yiddish/Hebrew collection of the Rebbe’s teachings about yahrtzeits of various tzadikim.  Satellite Tosher communities have been established in various locations including Borough Park, Williamsburg, Kiryas Joel, Monsey and London.

The levaya for the Tosher Rebbe is expected to take place at 7 PM tonight in Kiryas Tosh.

Raizel Morgenstern buried in Monsey

The Grandfather R' Leibish Morgenstern giving hesped 

Chuck Schumer Against The World

Jack Engelhard’s classic international bestselling novel Indecent Proposal, which later became a worldwide hit movie,

by Jack Engelhard

Of Abraham it’s said that in smashing idols and embracing the absolute sovereignty of a single G-d, he became one man standing against the rest of the world. Well maybe it’s not quite that lonely and heroic for Chuck Schumer, but pretty close. To a Democrat like Schumer,Barack Obama is “the rest of the world.”

That took guts doing what he did. Last week Schumer put to rest all doubt. He will vote to defeat Obama’s Iran Nuke Deal.

So doing he risks the displeasure of the President and the Party. He also risks losing his bid to become Party leader in the Senate.

Toughest of all, perhaps, Schumer risks being called out for voting Jewish

Yes, Schumer is known for his warmth for the Jewish State. But Schumer is a United States Senator. He declared himself against the deal because the deal is harmful to the United States. He spoke up for his New York constituents and he is acting in accord with his American conscience.

This is a rotten deal. It is against the best interests of the United States and it must go down. That is Schumer’s thinking and that is Schumer at his best.

Last week, Obama spent an hour trying to put lipstick on this pig. 

The President resorted to a crafty age-old trick, blaming Israel – you know, the Jews, wink, wink – in case the deal fell, and he singled out Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for being so stubborn.

Bibi is guilty of “unprecedented interference” in US politics, according to Obama with Fareed Zakaria on CNN. As if an Israeli leader speaking his mind is somehow out of turn. 

This is the same Obama who dispatched an army of political fixers to interfere Bibi from getting reelected.

Obama was sending a message. 

The message was meant for Bibi and the warning was meant for Schumer. Behave or else.

Hours later, Schumer went public. He refused to be intimidated. The timing itself – that really took guts.

Schumer became an instant hero to those who disdain the Iraq deal, and rightly so, but some people wanted more. Why did Chuck say that he was only acting on his own behalf? Why did he say that he would not, repeat not rally his fellow Democrats to his side?

Well, what more can we possibly want? Schumer still has to live in the real world. He still has to caucus with members of his own Party.

He still has to do lunch with the President – the leader of his Party, the leader of his country. Too much lobbying would be rubbing it in.

Schumer has done plenty as it is. He should not be made to answer for what he is not doing.

We know where the Liberals stand. Running on TV at the moment is a J Street commercial frantically supporting the deal.

Swallow it, they say. It’s good for you. Take the medicine.

Why is it so good? Because Obama says so, that’s why.

Plus, John Kerry and his team put it together and is there a smarter man on the face of the earth than John Kerry?

To this observer, there is no need to talk centrifuges or “snap-back” clauses or secret agreements to know that Kerry was taken to the cleaners.

The proof of it is that Kerry left Tehran leaving four hostages behind. If he could not get that much business done, surely he was swindled on everything else.

But the Left insists that we won. They tell the rest of us that we have no right to object because we do not have all the facts.

This is true. We do not know all the details. Precisely why we are suspicious and why we find it impossible to talk to a Liberal.

They truly say this… They argue that nobody knows what’s in the deal… but it’s a good deal.

Stop scratching your head. Go, make sense of that logic…plus this logic from Obama himself, saying that they “don’t really mean it” when they chant “Death to the United States” and “Death to Israel.” Six million Jews had to die in order to prove that Hitler really did mean it.

How many chances are we supposed to give the ayatollahs to likewise prove that they mean what they keep saying?

New York-based author and bestselling novelist Jack Engelhard writes a regular column for Arutz Sheva. Website: www.jackengelhard.com

Michael Lerner and his magazine Tikkun, still passionately lobbying against Israel,

by Binyamin Korn

Isn't it remarkable how much of the fight over the Iran deal is a battle between different factions in the Jewish world?

First off, one would think it would be an argument primarily over whether the agreement endangers America, not Israel. After all--as Prime Minister Netanyahu reminded us in his webcast this week--Iran still regards America as "the Great Satan"; Israel is just "the little Satan." Sure, Iranian protesters add an occasional "Death to Israel" to their chants, but it is "Death to America" that is heard loudest and longest.

Yet on Capitol Hill, the question that seems to be occupying everyone's mind is: 
how will Jewish Congress members vote?
 And on the op-ed pages and the radio talk shows, we hear mostly about AIPAC vs. J Street, and pundits speculate as to whether other Jewish organizations will support or oppose the Iran deal.

In Israel, both the governing Likud coalition and the Labor Party ("Zionist Union") opposition oppose the agreement.

 In the United States, the latest polls show the majority of American Jews oppose it. None of that seems to matter to J Street and others on the Jewish far left, who are spending millions of dollars in search of public and congressional support for the Iran agreement.

Think about it: 
Israeli Jews, from left to right, oppose the agreement because they recognize that it will put nuclear weapons in the hands of the Iranian theocracy, and it will strengthen Iran’s proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas terrorists.

 Yet a well-funded fringe faction of American Jews is aggressively supporting the agreement. 

Their actions could pave the way for more rockets to hit Tel Aviv--and that's just for starters.

 What motivates such Jews to take steps that will endanger the lives of their fellow-Jews?

A convincing answer is to be found in the remarkable new book, Jews Against Themselves, by Edward Alexander, just published by Transaction Books. Alexander, a professor emeritus at the University of Washington, is a combat veteran of the intra-Jewish quarrels of the past several decades, and he is one of the most skilled. In this, perhaps the most important of his many books, Prof. Alexander takes on the painfully relevant topic of what he calls "the new forms taken by Jewish apostasy."

Classic Jewish apostasy consisted of converting to Christianity or Islam, usually in order to avoid being persecuted. The modern version stems from essentially the same motive, but takes on peculiar forms. Nowadays, Jewish apostasy involves proudly brandishing one's Jewish identity or associations in order to legitimize actions that undermine Israel--in order to avoid being blamed for unpopular Israeli actions.

There is the author and pundit Peter Beinart, whose promotion of a boycott of "settlers" is, in fact, an extension of the 65 year-old Arab economic boycott of Israel, Alexander argues: "The 'selective' boycott requires boycotting feta cheese coming from cows in Judea but not companies--such as [those that] have been punished by the U.S. Treasury Department--that procure military equipment used by Hezbollah to murder Jews in Nahariya and Acco."

There are the Jewish faculty members at the Berkeley campus of the University of California who have built a cottage industry on denying that there is anti-Semitism on their campus, on other campuses, or practically anywhere else. Although Prof. Judith Butler, a leader of this group, grudgingly concedes that "those who do violence to synagogues" may be classified as anti-Semitic, she will not use that word to characterize violence against "synagogues and seders in Israel," Alexander points out. Good grief!

There is the peripatetic Michael Lerner and his magazine Tikkun, still passionately lobbying against Israel, more than two decades after his fifteen minutes of fame as then-First Lady's Hillary Clinton's short-lived moral guru. (Clinton's "Jewish Rasputin" is more like it, Alexander writes, recalling the pernicious role of the Russian Czar's senior adviser.)

And there are the obnoxious Jewish left-wing activists who invoke their dead grandmothers as weapons in the war against Israel, claiming that if Grandma were still alive,"she would be right there with me protesting against Israeli apartheid," as one recently wrote. Alexander comments: "Jewish mothers, one notices, rarely receive these accolades from their Israel-hating daughters; often still alive, mothers constitute too great a risk."

Jewish supporters of the Iran deal can't possibly think that the agreement itself makes America or Israel safer. They are driven by something else--by a desire to find favor with the current occupant of the White House, the news media, and the academic and intellectual elites whom they admire. It's disturbing, and in some ways hard to understand.

Jews Against Themselves sheds much-needed light on the subject and deserves to be on everyone's "must reading" list. 

As Multiple White House Lies About the Iran Deal Emerge, the Obama Regime Unleashes Anti-Semetic Attacks on Chuck Schumer

From Rush Limbaugh Show, most of his points were discussed on this blog weeks ago..

RUSH; Big news from the Middle East about the Iran deal.  It turns out that we were negotiating with the Iranians before Kerry was secretary of state. We were negotiating with the Iranians before the election of the "moderate" Rouhani.  We were negotiating an Iranian nuke deal with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when nobody knew what was happening.  The Regime was telling us that they couldn't do anything 'cause Ahmadinejad was such a radical extremist goofball.

We had to wait for a "moderate" to win, which was Rouhani, and after he did, that's when we got serious.  It turns out none of that's true. We had been negotiating with the Iranians long before then and signaling our willingness that they can nuke up.  This latest news is from MEMRI, which is a credible Middle East news source.  Details coming up. 

RUSH: What the Obama administration and the Democrat Party are doing to Chuck Schumer... They are treating Chuck Schumer as though he is a Republican, 'cause he is opposed -- come out opposed to -- the Iran deal.  The attacks they are mounting on him are bigoted -- some might even say racist or ethnic -- highlighting in every report "Chuck Schumer, noted Jew," it says in the New York Times, "Chuck Schumer, noted Jewish senator from New York," Washington Post.

They're saying that Schumer voted against the deal because he's in bed with the big money Jewish lobby.  They usually reserve that for Republican Jewish people.  But Schumer is getting it all from sides, led by the White House.  

RUSH: Let me give you the latest here on the Iran story, because this is stunning.  The American people have been lied to about another three issues regarding this deal, this so-called nuclear deal with Iran.  First, it turns out that negotiations did not start because of Iran electing a "moderate," "some guy we could do business with," i.e., Rouhani.  It turns out that the negotiations between the United States and Iran began when Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was still president.

But we were told by the administration that there's no way we could talk to Iran with Ahmadinejad in there because he's a nutcase, he's an extremist, he's a lunatic. That was one of the excuses the Regime gave for not doing anything on Iran at that time.  And there was pressure to do something, because the news coming out of Iran was they were bragging about how much progress they were making toward the discovery, creation, development of a nuclear power.

And the Regime was saying, "We can't talk to 'em. There's no reason to get into negotiation with this guy 'cause he's such a madman.  We have to wait for them to have their next presidential election. Hopefully they'll elect a moderate," which they did. There's no such thing, by the way.  This is another thing.  There's no such thing as a "moderate" Iranian leader, and there's no such thing as a "conservative" Iranian cleric.  The guy that runs Iran is the supreme leader. 

His name is the Ayatollah Khamenei, and he is the heir to the first Ayatollah Khomeini.  They spell their names differently.  One is K-h-o, that would be the original Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, and this guy spells his name with an A, other than that they're identical.  Anyway, he is the supreme leader, and whoever the "president" is a figurehead. Whoever the president is has to clear everything with the supreme leader. 

The supreme leader is the genuine radical that runs this country and is state sponsor of terrorism all over the Middle East and parts of the world.  The guy leading the chants "Death to America!" is the supreme leader, and he's standing there with his Kalashnikov while doing it. He's written a book on how to trick and how to fool the US and how they're gonna wipe out Israel, after the deal has been effected between us, the other five nations, and Iran. 

So who their "president" is matters not in terms of what the policy of the country is going to be.  It is a genuine theological, religious dictatorship, and it's run by the mullahs.  The Ayatollah Khamenei has his buddy ayatollahs, and they make up the supreme leadership council.  But the president is merely an office for the rest of the world to observe and think that Iran's just like every other country. 

"It has an elected president! It has a parliament! It's a democratic process!" None of that is true.  So the idea that we had to wait for Ahmadinejad to go? Why do you think they got rid of Ahmadinejad?  Why do we even get Rouhani in the first place? Isn't it amazing that we're sitting around waiting for a "moderate," and they deliver one?  How's that happen?  They got rid of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad because the guy was too open and honest about what the intentions of the extreme leader are. 

Every time he opened his mouth, it was "Death to America! Death to Israel!" There was no Holocaust, whatever was it. Every time he opened his mouth.  He made it tough for the supreme leader to put forth the false image that Iran is a moderate, harmless country simply wanting to move into the twenty-first century.  So Obama says, "Well, we can't negotiate with some nutcase like that!  We gotta wait for a moderate."

Bammo! They give us Rouhani as a moderate, we start to negotiate -- the point is we were negotiating with Ahmadinejad, because whenever you're negotiating with your negotiating with supreme leader.  Negotiating with the Ayatollah Khamenei.  There isn't a single one of these people over there can make a deal or any agreement within a deal without the approval of the Ayatollah Khamenei, the supreme leader. 

Now, the second thing we were lied about, even before the negotiations began, is John Kerry -- who was a senator at the time -- acting on Obama's orders, had already recognized Iran's right to enrich uranium on their own soil.  This was known and reported all the way back in 2007.  I think it is huge, because the United States has been trying for more than a decade to make Iran stop its uranium enrichment program.  That involved the centrifuges and all that. 

It turns out even before he was secretary of state, Senator John Kerry, as emissary of the Regime, green-lighted Iran's right to go ahead and enrich uranium on their own soil.  Now, the entire purpose... To illustrate the focus or the magnitude of this lie, the entire purpose of the economic sanctions that we slapped on Iran was to get them to stop their enrichment.  Not only were the sanctions designed to get them to stop, they were designed to prevent them from being able to.

Because with the sanctions in place, they wouldn't have the money, the capital, or access to materiel that they needed in order to move forward.  And yet all of it did move forward while we had sanctions placed on them, while Ahmadinejad was the president -- who we said we couldn't negotiate with, who we said we couldn't negotiate with.  By the way, it's been reported by that great Middle Eastern news service, MEMRI, M-E-M-R-I. All of this was a charade.  The third thing, the third lie, third issue we were lied to about. 

The Iranians are already pumping and selling their oil like crazy.  Now, the Obama administration claims that sanctions are not yet been lifted on Iran as it relates to their oil.  MEMRI is the Middle East Media Research Institute.  The headline of the story: "Iranian Senior Officials Disclose Confidential Details From Nuclear Negotiations."  So the source for all this is a bunch of braggadocios Iranians who feel that it's apparently okay now 'cause the deal's done and Obama's on his way to making sure the world and everybody else ratifies this thing. 

"Iranian officials recently began to reveal details from the nuclear negotiations with the US since their early stages. Their statements indicate that the US initiated secret negotiations with Iran not after President Hassan Rohani, [supposedly] of the pragmatic camp, was elected in 2013, but rather in 2011-2012, in the era of radical president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad."  Again, folks, there's no difference in the two.  Don't doubt me on this.  Because whoever's "president" is nothing more than a placeholder. 

He's a public figurehead that's designed to create or produce or present an image of Iran as your normal, everyday, run-of-the-mill nation that has a president, has a parliament, that has elections and so forth.  "The disclosures also indicate that, already at that time, Iran received from the US administration a letter recognizing its right to enrich uranium on its own soil," while we supposedly had sanctions in place.  President Barack Obama has wanted Iran to be able to move forward on their nuclear program. 

He made it possible for this to happen even while sanctions were supposedly in place.  "Hossein Sheikh Al-Islam, an advisor to the Majlis speaker, specified that the letter had come from John Kerry, then a senator and head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Iranian vice president and top negotiator Ali Akbar Salehi said that Kerry, while still a senator, had been appointed by President Obama to handle the nuclear contacts with Iran." Kerry was assuring the Iranians they had the right to enrich uranium on their soil since 2007. 

Now, what's happening here is Chuck Schumer has come out in opposition to the deal, and the administration is unloading on him.  The administration and its buddies in the media are unloading on Chuck Schumer.  They accuse him... Washington Post, New York Times, they accuse him of being "a Jew who is in bed with the Jewish lobby, wealthy interests." 

All of the code words it had usually use to attack conservatives they are using here to attack Chuck Schumer.

James Taranto, Best of the Web, Wall Street Journal:  "Bigotry, Pure and Simple -- The ugly attacks on Senator Chuck Schumer."  

Now, say what you want, Senator Chuck Schumer is getting a taste of his own tactics.  I mean, he's not a stranger to these tactics.  He has used them himself.  I just find it fascinating he's on the receiving end of them now.  And, by the way, other Jewish members of Congress are also getting to one degree or another the same kind of treatment as Chuck-U Schumer is getting from the administration, from the Regime. 

Basically the attacks are all, "He's not a loyal American! He's a Jew first!  He's an Israeli Jew and he's supporting the Jewish lobby."  

It's despicable.  It really is.  It's the kind of stuff that when a conservative Republican comes out and supports Israel, that's the kind of stuff they say about him.  And now they're accusing Chuck Schumer, but it goes worse than that.  Now they've got McCain coming out, actively opposing this deal for his own reasons.  McCain is saying the Senate is not gonna pass this; the Senate is not gonna make this reality. 

Obama is saying, "I don't need you! I already got the UN. It's gonna happen. I don't care. You guys are just exercising your own folly here.  I don't need you guys to vote for this.  It's already a done deal."  I gotta tell you, like I said yesterday, I really misjudged this whole Schumer thing.  I thought that Schumer coming out for the deal meant that they had enough Democrat votes to pass this thing and that Schumer could thus vote against it and remain loyal to his base in New York.

Which, in majority (I guess) position opposes the deal.  But it turns out that's not the case.  It turns out his opposition to it is real and substantive, and it's extensively documented and written.  But I tell you, folks, this is the kind of in-the-weeds stuff that I know that the low-information crowd couldn't care less about; they're not gonna understand it when they hear it.

But it's huge, to me, the things that we've been lied to about and the objective that these lies reveal. All along we have been facilitating Iran's quest? All along we have been helping them make it possible?  It now puts... You know, people have analyzed the deal and said, "Yeah, Iran's gonna get a deal in two years, 10 years." It all makes sense now.  

RUSH: Stan in Winlock, Washington.  Great to have you on the program Stan.  Hello, sir.

CALLER:  Hello and thank you very much for taking my call.  I'll get right to my point.  I think Obama's brilliant.  He put Israel in a no-win situation when he got the UN to approve the Iran nuke deal.  If Israel unilaterally destroys Iran's nuke capability, it will be condemned by the UN and they become the outlaw nation, not Iran.  If Israel does nothing, Iran gets the bomb and Israel is toast.  And all this was done while framing himself as seeking peace.

RUSH:  Let my let me ask you a question, and I'm not per se disagreeing with that other than your claim that Obama's brilliant.  He may be a brilliant deceitful political tactician. Do you think Israel cares? On one hand, Israel destroyed and vaporized.  On the other hand, the UN thinks Israel is mean.  Which do you think they would choose?

CALLER:  Oh, I think they have no choice.  I think they will react militarily.

RUSH:  Well, do you know that Obama has told them that we will stop them if this try to do that?  Do you know that in this deal in the United States and the other negotiating partners promise to protect Iran against such an Israeli attack?

CALLER:  Yeah, and supposedly Obama's saying there won't be any war but Israel's already said that they will have no choice.

RUSH:  No, no.

CALLER:  They have to defend themselves.

RUSH:  Obama said there would be a war if we don't approve the deal.  Oh, really?  Well, who's gonna start that war?  There won't be a war if there...? There will be a war if there isn't a deal?  How does that work?  If that's the case, who starts that war?  It must be the Ayatollah Khamenei ticked off you can't get his nuclear power.  Who would start that? If there is no deal, it guarantees a war?  This is what Obama said.  It's a classic Obama tactic.  "You either take my way or it's Armageddon!"

On either health care or economy, the stimulus. Now the Iran deal. Whatever it is, "It's either my way or it's the end of the world! It's either my way or hell! It's either my way or the worst that can possibly happen."  He always creates a straw dog.  And, by the way, there are always people, in Obama's worldview, who want the worst that can happen.  

In this case, it would be Benjamin Netanyahu.  His straw dog or straw man always has people who represent the evil that he says would naturally occur if his way doesn't happen.  Stan, I appreciate the call.  

Hinda Spira and Raizel Morgenstern from Boro Park die in Crash In Arizona UPDATED Photos

Raizel Morgenstern  girl in white,Hinda Spira extreme left, all four girls in picture were in accident

The Levaya for Hindy Spira A”H will be held tonight, Tuesday, at around 10:00PM at Shomrei Hadas Chapels on 14th Avenue and 38th Street in Boro Park. The Kevura will be in New Square later tonight.

The Levaya for Raizel Morgenstern A”H will be held tonight, Tuesday, at around 11:00PM at Shomrei Hadas Chapels on 14th Avenue and 38th Street in Boro Park. The Kevura will be in Monsey later tonight.

UPDATE 1:00PM ET:

 Misaskim of Los Angeles director Malkiel Gradon along with other Los Angeles askanim traveled overnight to Arizona and arrived there early this morning. Some are dealing with Kovod Hames, while the others are coordinating with the survivors until family members arrive from NY which is scheduled at about 2pm Pacific Time. A local Chabad Shaliach was contacted early on, and was with the injured in the hospital.

The cause of the accident remains under investigation. The girls who were sitting in the front seat of the vehicle, were the two occupants who were R”L killed. Thru amazing nissim the rear two passengers survived.

Deputies from the Arizona police are combing the wreckage and should have a more comprehensive report as the day progresses.

Two girls from Boro Park were R”L killed when the vehicle they were traveling in collided with a tractor trailer. The accident occurred on 26 Menachem Av, the night between Monday and Tuesday. 

The fatal accident occurred in Arizona. 

Two girls were killed and two others sustained non-life-threatening injuries. The girls were on vacation when a vehicle veered from the opposite lane, crashing into them.

The names of the victims z”l are Hindy Spira and Raizel Morgenstern.

Misaskim has been working though the night with the families in Boro Park, and tell YWN that a private jet has been arranged to fly the deceased to NY for the Levayos.

UPDATE: One occupant of the vehicle is Miriam bas Gittel, who has multiple fractures – including a spinal fracture. She is the daughter of Rabbi Yanky (Jack) Meyer, the founder of the Misaskim Organization. Please be Mispallel for her as she needs Rachamei Shomayim.

UPDATED!

An accident in Holbrook, Arizona, has claimed the lives of Raizel Morgensterna”h and Hindy Spira a”h of Boro Park, Brooklyn.

The girls, who were on a summer vacation, were traveling last night in Navajo County when a tractor trailer barreled into their vehicle, killing them and wounding the other two girls in the car. The accident occured at about 11:30 p.m. local time.

Police said that it was not clear why the driver of the tractor trailer veered out of his lane and into the car transporting the girls.

All are asked to daven for another occupant of the car, Miriam bas Gittel, a daughter of the famed Rabbi Yanky Meyer of Misaskim who sustained serious injuries in the accident and is currently undergoing surgery. All are asked to daven as well for Faiga Sarah bas Bracha (Myerovitz).

Friends of the girls shared a picture  showing Raizel and Hindy with three friends at Lea Brea Bagel in Los Angeles earlier in their trip. The friends described Raizel and Hindy in the most glowing terms, highlighting their wonderful personalities, their warmth, their sensitivity, their ehrlichkeit and how beloved they were by all who knew them.

“There was nothing they wouldn’t do for others,” they said. “They brought such joy to others and such nachas to their families. There are no words to describe how special they were or the feelings now of those who knew them.”

This tragedy has shaken the girls’ families and friends, plunging them into mourning. Two gems have been plucked from our midst.

Levayah arrangements are being finalized. Further details will be provided as they become available.

Megyn Kelly, Trump's Tormentor ..... who is she? Really?

She’s a liberal and always has been. The lumpenconservatariat fools who digest everything they are served at FOX News think she’s one of them, and they are wrong.

 She’s not a journalist.  She’s a failed former lawyer who wanted to be famous as her ambition in life. 

She’s already said in press interviews that she wants to be the next Barbara Walters or Diane Sawyer because we apparently need more Caitlyn Jenner two-hour specials and more people answering, “If you were a twee, what twee would you be?”

She nearly left FOX News for ABC, but she wanted to be the star and ABC couldn’t guarantee that, but Roger Ailes did. And in true keeping with her fame-whorism, Kelly wanted herself and her hair extensions to be the stars of Thursday’s GOP debate, NOT the candidates themselves. Everything’s all about her and her narcissism. Me, me, me, me. And yes, from the shoulders down, that isn’t her real hair. Those are hair extensions some women in India sacrificed to Krishna and Vishnu. Just sayin’.

If you think she’s conservative, ask her what she’s conservative on (she’s announced she isn’t conservative on any social issues) and why she dumped her first husband and bragged about it on FOX News. 
The answer: 
she dumped him so she could marry a Mr. Mom wimp in the form of a novelist I never heard of, named Douglas Brunt–the last name being so appropriate in spades. Megyn Kelly is the man in that family..  She doesn’t particularly like men, and Trump got more than a taste of that.

She’s not a journalist, and it shows. Kelly never checks her facts, which is why she got easily duped into promoting a fake “human shield”–Hezbollah tramp Hanan Kahwaji a/k/a “Brigitte Gabriel”–on her news show. 

And why she got caught in a laughable flop during her much hyped interview of Bill Ayers. She said she learned about Muslim honor killings, which she didn’t know about, by reading Michelle Fraudkin’s website. Wow, what an ignoramus! 

She’s not a reporter, not a journalist, and not informed. She’s a celebrity, which is what she always wanted–a supermodel. She’s on FOX News for one reason and one reason only: she looks good. And it’s show biz.

The pretentious names of her children–Yardley, Yates, and Thatcher–are the surest sign of being a low-class attention-seeker. You can always tell the pretenders and the wannabes by the fancy names they give their kids–names destined to be stripper names in less than a decade. Notice me, notice me, notice my kids and their fancy names! Aren’t we exotic!

And that, dear readers, is Megyn Kelly –and FOX News–in a nutshell. Nothing worth watching or caring about.

Trump is the only excitement in the GOP right now, and Kelly can’t stand it. So,she is gonna trash him to promote herself like the cheap suit that she is.

IN 2010 Megyn Kelly went on with shock-jock Howard Stern and discussed her breast size, her husbands penis and sex during pregnancy, some "journalist"

Ten days ago two UNDOCUMENTED

illegals raped and hammered a 64 year old woman to death in Santa Maria, California. Victor Aureliano Martinez Ramirez and Jose Villagomez broke into Marilyn Pharis' home. Raped her and hammered her repeatedly. She died a couple of days later. Fox did not report her death for days. It appears that they did not want the public to know that Trump was correct in his assessment of many of those sneaking into the USA.

Did I mention that Megyn Kelly said she respects Hillary Clinton “and all that she’s achieved.” Um, what has she achieved exactly? 

And Kelly said that if she lands an interview with Hillary, she will feed her softball questions.
 “I think Hillary Clinton could handle me — easily. . . . If you want to get big-name Democrats who are running for president, do you want to annihilate them? Of course not.” Yes, she did say that. Read it here. 

Oh, and she says that if she interviewed Hillary Clinton, “that would be epic television.” 
Wow, someone’s an egomaniac.

The "Worm" Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich has blamed a Jewish “axis” of power for “polarizing” the debate around the Iran deal.

This pathetic creature, Robert Reich, who once dated Hillary Clinton, and endorsed Hussein Obama for President, came out of his disgusting hole to bad mouth Prime Minister Netanyahu, the leader of the only free nation in the entire Middle East, saying that Netanyahu "interfered" into American politics"

Hey, worm? Didn't Obama interfere with Israeli politics sending a team of "experts" to defeat Netanyahu in the election, on taxpayer's money"?

To give you an inkling who this animal is, just know that  he worked for Carter, Clinton and Obama!

Hey, Robert .... crawl back to your hole...

In a Facebook post on Sunday, Reich said that the “Nentanyahu-AIPAC-Adelson-Republican axis” posed “a serious danger to America, Israel, and American Jews.” He slammed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for “interfering in American politics as no foreign leader has ever done before,” and blamed him for turning Democrats against Israel. He did not mention Obama’s charge that Republicans are making “common cause” with Iranian hard-liners.

Reich also claimed: “Polls suggest a solid majority of American Jews support Obama and the administration’s diplomacy.” In fact, recent polls show a plurality of American Jews oppose the deal. Like President Barack Obama, he attacked AIPAC for running ads against the deal–ignoring the millions being spent by left-wing groups like J Street to support it.

The term “axis” is an odd choice, applied to Jews, given that Nazi Germany was one of the Axis Powers of World War II, during which the Third Reich murdered six million Jews.

An editorial by Tablet magazine last week called on supporters of the Iran deal to stop using antisemitic themes: “Accusing Senators and Congressmen whose misgivings about the Iran deal are shared by a majority of the U.S. electorate of being agents of a foreign power, or of selling their votes to shadowy lobbyists, or of acting contrary to the best interests of the United States, is the kind of naked appeal to bigotry and prejudice that would be familiar in the politics of the pre-Civil Rights Era South.”

Fox pushing pushing Hillary Clinton for President