“I don’t speak because I have the power to speak; I speak because I don’t have the power to remain silent.” Rav Kook z"l

Monday, October 26, 2026

The crazy Kol Kora the Moetzes wanted to go public

 


Guys, it's crazy out there and getting crazier! 
I am posting an article below from the Lakewood Media Site, CBN!
They are reporting that the Moetzes were ready to post a KOL Kora that read:

"Voters must vote exclusively for United Torah Judaism and that anyone who does not vote for Gimmel indirectly becomes a partner in a chillul Hashem and bears a very serious sin."

The Gerer rebbe is justifely correct that he opposes it, because this letter implies that anyone voting for Shas is a Rasha and causing a Chillul Hashem!  

The revised letter is just as bad, as this reads:

" United Torah Judaism is the only list the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah calls on the public to support, while warning against voting for parties not approved by Gedolim."

Which "Gedoilim?" The Gedoilei Hador of the New Charedie Party are not "Gedoilim?""

This sick Charedie mindset better change soon, because it brings Sinas Chinum and is not bringing a single person closer to the RBS"O 


*Agudas Yisrael Election Kol Koreh Delayed Again Amid Dispute Over Wording*

Agudas Yisrael’s traditional election kol koreh has been delayed once again. Yaakov Waltzer, secretary of the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah, instructed Hamodia and Hamevaser not to publish the document Sunday as discussions among the admorim over its final wording continue. Monday is now being considered as the new publication date.

The dispute centers on the original text, which had been approved for publication before being rejected at the last minute Thursday evening. It stated that voters must vote exclusively for United Torah Judaism and that anyone who does not vote for Gimmel indirectly becomes a partner in a chillul Hashem and bears a very serious sin.

The Gerrer Rebbe objected, arguing that the wording implied that anyone voting for Shas was a sinner, despite following the instructions of their own rabbanim.

A softened version was subsequently proposed, stating that United Torah Judaism is the only list the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah calls on the public to support, while warning against voting for parties not approved by Gedolim. The revised text removed the declaration that anyone who does not vote for Gimmel is a partner in a chillul Hashem.

Waltzer circulated the revised wording among the admorim’s courts on Friday and Motzai Shabbos, but no agreement was reached. Discussions continue over whether to approve the softened version, restore the original warning or draft a compromise.

Publication has been postponed again, with a final decision expected after further discussions.

Charedie Torah Leaders that turn the public into a voiceless mass incapable of independent thought is not merely a public wrong; it is the very opposite of the Torah’s path




 Threats and intimidation by Charedie Gedoilim directed at other rabbis who express their views are not the way of the Torah.

When one reads a letter written in the language of explicit threats, personal warfare slogans, and calls for boycotts and public shaming of those who disagree, it is difficult not to be shocked by the depths to which public discourse can sink.

 Beyond the bullying and aggressive rhetoric, the notion that not only is the public forbidden to think, criticize, or exercise independent judgment, but that even rabbis and Torah scholars may not express their own opinions, and that every differing view is met with threatening letters and coercive tactics, is a dangerous and destructive outlook.

Standing against this outlook is the pure halachic tradition and the authentic heritage of the Torah. The Torah instructed even the greatest sage on the Sanhedrin to state his opinion last, so that other voices could be heard.

 Furthermore, younger scholars are obligated to express their views. As the Minchat Chinuch (Mitzvah 77) writes:

“If the great scholar states his opinion, and the lesser scholar has his own opinion and does not find the words of the great scholar convincing, he is certainly obligated to express his opinion and disagree with him. Otherwise, this constitutes a perversion of justice.”

(As is likewise explained in the writings of the Ran, Sanhedrin 46a, and Responsa of the Radbaz, Part I, Siman 308.)

It does not say, “He is permitted to disagree,” but rather, “He is obligated to express his opinion and disagree.” Moreover, one may not fear the intimidation of a rabbinic authority, in accordance with the Torah’s commandment: “You shall not be intimidated by any person.” 

(As explained in Sanhedrin 6b, which also resolves the question raised by the Bach on Choshen Mishpat, end of Siman 9.)

The Torah demands that every individual bear full responsibility to use his intellect and judgment. 

Attempting to frighten people, suppress criticism through threats and public humiliation, and turn the public into a voiceless mass incapable of independent thought is not merely a public wrong; it is the very opposite of the Torah’s path.

The time has come to purge this culture of intimidation from our midst and return to the way of the Torah: genuine clarification of truth, personal moral and spiritual responsibility, and authentic respect for the Torah and its students.

With deep sorrow, and with the hope of restoring the honor and stature of Torah.

:איומים והפחדות כנגד רבנים המביעים את דעתם, אינם דרכה של תורה.


כשקוראים מכתב המנוסח באיומים מפורשים, בסיסמאות של מלחמה אישית ובקריאות להחרמה ולפרסום פומבי נגד מי שחולק על דעתם, קשה שלא להזדעזע מהתהום שאליו יכול להידרדר השיח הציבורי. מעבר לכוחנות ולרטוריקה האלימה, התפיסה לפיה לא רק לציבור אסור לחשוב, לבקר או להפעיל שיקול דעת עצמאי, אלא אפילו רבנים וחכמים אחרים לא יכולים לומר דעתם, וכל עמדה שונה נענית במכתבי הפחדה ואלימות כוחנית, זוהי תפיסה מסוכנת והרסנית.

כנגד התפיסה הזו ניצבת ההלכה הצרופה ומסורת התורה האמיתית. התורה הזהירה את הגדול שבסנהדרין לומר דעתו בסוף הדיון כדי לאפשר לקולות האחרים להישמע. וחובת החכמים הקטנים להשמיע את דעתם ובלשונו של ה"מנחת חינוך" (מצווה עז): "אם הגדול אומר דעתו והקטן יש לו דעת ואינו נראה לו דברי הגדול, בודאי מחויב לומר דעתו ולחלוק עליו ובלא זה הוי מטה דין". (וכן מבואר בדברי הר"ן סנהדרין מו א ושו"ת הרדב"ז חלק א סימן שח)

לא כתוב 'מותר לו לחלוק עליו' אלא 'מחויב לומר דעתו ולחלוק עליו'. ואף אסור לחשוש מאלימות של הרב, כציווי התורה לא תגורו מפני איש. (וכמבואר סנהדרין ו' ב' ובכך מיושבת קושיית הב"ח חושן משפט סוף סימן ט)

התורה תובעת מכל אדם את האחריות המלאה להפעיל את שכלו ואת שיקול דעתו. הניסיון להלך אימים על אנשים, להשתיק ביקורת באיומים ובביוש פומבי, ולהפוך את הציבור לחסרי קול חושב – אינו רק פסול ציבורית, אלא הוא היפך דרכה של תורה.

הגיע הזמן להקיא מתוכנו את תרבות האיומים הזו, ולחזור לדרכה של תורה, לבירור אמיתי, ללקיחת אחריות מוסרית ותורנית וכבוד אמיתי לתורה ולומדיה.

בצער רב ובציפייה להרמת קרנה של תור


Sunday, October 25, 2026

The Max Naumann Story should teach the Indig and his Satmar Community that supporting a Vicious Antisemite will not bring them safety!

 

Max Naumann

Let me introduce you to a fellow named Max Naumann.

In 1934, Naumann, a German Jew, urged fellow Jews to support Adolf Hitler. He defended the Nazi regime even as it persecuted Jews, and actually petitioned Hitler for the right of Jews to fly the German flag.

In 1935, the Gestapo dissolved his organization and threw him in prison, where he attempted suicide. He died of cancer in 1939, before the Holocaust, but not before discovering how little his loyalty to the Nazis was worth.

I'm not comparing Mayor Mamzarani to Hitler. I'm questioning the idea that a Jewish endorsement is, by itself, evidence of what's best for Jewish safety.

From the Hellenizing Jewish elites of ancient Jerusalem to Jewish supporters of Iran's Islamic Revolution, we have examples throughout our history of Jews aligning themselves with political movements that ultimately turned against them.

Their motivations differed, as did the consequences. But there's a lesson in Max Naumann's story that's worth remembering.

Being Jewish has never made anyone immune to being catastrophically wrong about what's good for Jews.

Moetzes Gedoilie Hador panicking about a letter Against Voting for SHAS because Shas will allow those not Learning to enlist in IDF

 

HaGaon HaRav Moshe Tzadka

Shas has opened its eyes and seen its followers abandoning the party in favor of Ben Gvir & Smotrich and now the New Charedie Party, Hatzibur Ha'Charedie. 

People are fed up with not being part of the rest of the Jewish people, and want those not learning full time to enlist in the IDF! This was actually the position of Rav Shach! 

A major development unfolded within Shas on Motzaei Shabbos, as five of the party’s seven Moetzes Chachmei HaTorah members visited the home of HaGaon HaRav Moshe Tzedaka in Yerushalayim, amid efforts to prevent the publication of a letter opposing a vote for Shas in Tuesday’s Knesset elections.

HaGaon HaRav Tzedaka, the elderly Rosh Yeshiva of Porat Yosef and one of the most prominent Sephardic Gedolei Torah, had reportedly been approached to sign a letter prohibiting support for Shas over the party’s position on drafting young Chareidi men who are not learning in yeshivos.

The reported letter prompted an urgent visit by senior members of Shas’s rabbinic leadership, concerned about the potential implications of such a public declaration just days before the elections.

Among those who arrived at HaGaon HaRav Tzedaka’s home were Moetzes President HaGaon HaRav Yitzchak Yosef, HaGaon HaRav Moshe Maya, HaGaon HaRav Avraham Salim, HaGaon HaRav Yehuda Cohen, and HaGaon HaRav Shmuel Betzalel.

The controversy centers on Shas’s willingness to support military enlistment for Chareidi young men who are not enrolled in yeshivos, a position that has drawn opposition from some rabbinic figures.

The initiative to secure HaGaon HaRav Tzedaka’s signature was reportedly led by HaMekubal HaRav Benayahu Shmueli, who maintains close ties with the Rosh Yeshiva.

However, during the meeting, HaGaon HaRav Tzedaka reportedly clarified that although neither he nor his father participated in Knesset elections, their longstanding practice should not be interpreted as opposition to Shas.

He further explained that those who do participate in elections should vote for Shas in order to protect the Torah world.

The clarification was particularly significant given HaGaon HaRav Tzedaka’s standing among Sephardic bnei Torah and the potential impact of a letter bearing his signature.

Following the departure of the five Moetzes members, sons of HaRav Benayahu Shmueli reportedly returned to HaGaon HaRav Tzedaka’s home.

Meanwhile, Shas chairman Aryeh Deri addressed the controversy during a television interview on Motzaei Shabbos.

“Rav Moshe Tzedaka never supported elections. We are dealing with it,” Deri said.

Why is Rav Landau and Goldknopf Freaking Out Over the New Charedie Party?? Do they know something we don't????

 


Every single poll shows that the New Charedie Party, Hatzibur Ha'Charedie, will not pass the threshold, yet Rav Landau has become more and more vocal screaming that he "he will fight even with strength he no longer has, to oppose this party."

Goldknop has run out of legitimate arguments opposing it, so he now says that the "Gedoilim are against Women sitting in the Knesset,"
 though Goldknopfs assistants in the Knesset are practically all women, 
which is ironic, since Goldknopf is a Gerer Chusid a chassidis known for openly distaining and disrespecting their women והמבין יבון!
 So instead of fighting this party on its merits, fights it with insults, intimidation and now we find out with violence.

In a letter that has since gone viral Rav Landau wrote against a Godol that endorsed the new party stating that "he will fight him" 
The Godol that this disgusting letter was addressed to is none other than Harav Yosef ben Arza the mechaber of the famous series called " Yosef Daas" and he is also the Rosh Mesivta of the Hesder Yeshiva "Mishmar Ha'torah," Rav Yosef is a descendant of the Late Gaon Rav Charlap z"l and a descendant of Rav Eliyahu Ki Toiv the mechaber of Sefer Ha'Todaah! 

Rav Landau added in his lettter against this Tzaddik and Gaon, "your action, endorsing this party, is like eating chielav on Yom Kippur, and eating Chumitz on Pesach"
Enough said! 


So if the polls are saying that the New Party will not pass the threshold, why are they so vocal, wouldn't it be better to keep quiet?

Rav Landau and Goldnopf know very well that the polls are not reliable and have been wrong in every single previous election, so they cannot take any chances.

They know that their own parties have not grown and not gotten an extra seat in the last 5 election cycles, even though their population is growing like crazy.

They already figured out that their "followers" have been voting for Smotrich and Ben Gvir, and so they took their dogs out to demean and disparage Ben Gvir saying that he is "chayiv Kareis for going up to the Har Habyis" something that he has been doing publicly for the last 6 years, and yet they have no problems partnering up with the left whose leaders are "chayiv kareis" for various different Torah prohibitions, and then mocking Smotrich saying he is a "kipa seruga dati-leumi" whose followers are going off the derech! 

That of course does not deter intelligent Yeshivaleit to discreetly vote for Ben Gvir and Smotrich. 

But now this New Charedie party is the biggest threat of them all, because with Ben Gvir and Smotrich, they never claimed that they are Charedim, but this party says that they are representing Charedim! And they are!!
This party is a threat to their very existence, because this is a threat that comes from within! 

And they know that their own women and wives are excited about this new party that has two Charedi woman in their roster !
Just in the last week, thousands of women have gotten together in Bnei-Brak, Yerushlayim and Beit Shemesh to show support for this party ! 
This is what is freaking them out! 
They foolishly believe if the New Party would just go away and opt out of the election those votes would go to their washed-up political parties, but the truth is they either wouldn't vote or vote for Ben Gvir and Smotrich! 


NBC’s outrageous media bias exposed in twisted coverage of Palestinian terror attack

 

NBC repeatedly softened its description of Palestinian terrorists while shifting its coverage of a deadly shooting attack toward Israeli “settler violence,” Netanyahu’s election campaign and Palestinian grievances.

By World Israel News Staff

NBC News published an outrageously slanted account of Friday morning’s shooting attack near Hebron, repeatedly using ‘cautious’ language to describe the Palestinian terrorists while shifting much of the focus to Israeli “settler violence,” the olive harvest and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s reelection campaign.

Five people were initially reported wounded in the terrorist attack near Yehuda Junction in southern Judea. It was later announced that two of the critically injured victims, both IDF soldiers, were killed in the attack.

The two Palestinian terrorists were armed with an M16 rifle and a handgun, according to the IDF. A large quantity of ammunition was also discovered in their vehicle, which military officials said was intended for a larger-scale attack.

Trump advisers see better chance to pursue Mideast agenda if Netanyahu loses

 

Neither Netanyahu nor Eisenkot currently appears to have a clear path to the 61 seats needed for a government.

By Vered Weiss, World Israel News

Some of President Donald Trump’s senior advisers believe an Israeli government led by someone other than Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could make it easier to pursue parts of Trump’s Middle East agenda after Tuesday’s election, U.S. officials told Axios.

Trump endorsed Netanyahu on Sunday after weeks of hesitation, but many of his closest advisers opposed the move because they believed he should stay out of the election, sources familiar with the discussions said.

“He’s the devil he knows,” one Trump adviser said of Trump’s view of Netanyahu.

Vice President Vance declined to follow Trump’s endorsement this week. “I’m not attacking Bibi Netanyahu. I’m not endorsing Bibi Netanyahu. I think the president’s endorsement is ultimately what matters,” Vance told reporters.

Sources familiar with their thinking said Vance and other senior officials became disillusioned with Netanyahu during the war with Iran and believe his pre-war assessments to the White House were mistaken.

Other disagreements involve Trump’s regional diplomatic priorities. Envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner have been frustrated by Netanyahu’s reluctance to advance Trump’s Gaza peace plan, while envoy Tom Barrack has concerns about Israel’s approach to Damascus and continued military operations in Syria.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his team have a better relationship with Netanyahu but believe Israel could do more to strengthen Lebanon’s government and curb settler attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank.

Trump also faces a decision after the Israeli election and U.S. midterms over whether to join Netanyahu in another major military operation against Iran. Netanyahu wants to move forward, while Trump also wants to pursue agreements involving Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Saudi Arabia.

Friday’s final pre-election polls from three major Israeli television networks projected Netanyahu’s bloc winning 50 seats in the 120-member Knesset, compared with 52 to 56 for former military chief Gadi Eisenkot’s opposition bloc. Another 14 to 16 seats were projected for two Arab Israeli parties.

Pro-Netanyahu Channel 14, however, projected 60 seats for Netanyahu’s bloc earlier this week.

Neither Netanyahu nor Eisenkot currently appears to have a clear path to the 61 seats needed for a government.

If neither succeeds, Israel could face another election, leaving Netanyahu as caretaker prime minister.

Motti Leitner Files Police Complaint Against Motke Blau for Blau's persecution, intimidation and humiliation against New Charedie Party

 ‎I filed a complaint with the Israel Police against Degel HaTorah member Motke Blau for incitement and serious threats.

In his criminal acts, Blau spilled the blood of tens of thousands of ultra-Orthodox people affiliated with the new Charedie party.

This violent Motka Blau's apparatus is currently conducting a campaign of persecution, intimidation and humiliation against us, hundreds of thousands of transparent ultra-Orthodox. Our supporters were fired from their jobs. Parents have received messages that their children will be kicked out of schools, threats and insults are constantly being sent. As the head of the party, I have a responsibility to the tens of thousands of ultra-Orthodox and thousands of activists who support us. I expect the Israel Police to bring Blau and his friends to justice, and to preserve the voting right of every ultra-Orthodox to vote according to his conscience and the instructions of his rabbis.‎

Friday, October 23, 2026

Zera Shimshon Parshat Lech Lecha

 



Chassidishe Yiddish Speaking Lady Destroys the Degel /Shas-/Aguda Narrative that are against The News Charedei Party

 



She is just great and very clever!

This was a Yiddish interview between Shloime Zionce and Motka Blau who is a spokesperson for the Degel Party led by Rav Landau, and they are talking about the New Charedie Party! 

Motka Blau is a "sonei yisrael" and if you understand Yiddish and you watch the video below you will be astounded on his total re-writing of history!

Motka Blau is telling Shloime Zionce that the Gedoilim prohibited women from being in the Knesset, an unmitigated lie! ....watch this lady commentator take apart that entire argument in just a few words! 

Watch her quote Rav Landau that said there is

 "no problem with woman in the Knesset since it is not "שררה"

When Blau says that Charedie Women in the Knesset is not "tzneeddik" she answers brilliantly 

"What about Degel MKs constantly talking and sitting with Chilonie Women in the Knesset ? Is it only Frum Women that men aren't allowed to talk to, but Chilonie women are ok?"

She then says "Wow" on how Blau describes Dr. Joffe a Charedie educator that taught in Charedie Girls Schools as "a meshiginar that totally went off"! 

Blau first starts off with saying that he knows Motti Leitner the founder of the New Charedie party and he knows him as a "letz" a comedian!

This is a typical Charedie tactic to put down anyone who has any legitimate argument countering their outdated and clueless narrative,

Well, Charedim are slowly rebelling against these smug Charedie Liars ! 


Motka after being questioned "Who is representing Charedie women, says arrogantly " we have Neshei Degel, we have Neshei Aguda" in other words  that they will vote for their interests , yet he forgot that women voting is also against the psak of those very Gedoiim! see comment from Emeilim Ba'torah👇






Explaining the Policies of Tzibur Hachareidi the New Charedie Party!v




Thursday, October 22, 2026

Yishai Fleisher: Ben Gvir, the Har Habayis, Dovid Hamelech & Terrorism

 


When is Rachel's Yurzeit? Really!

 


by  EMAILIM BATORAH

 WHEN is her Yahrzeit?
 
According to פסיקתא & רש"י, it's not on י"א חשוון



The פסיקתא רבתי writes, that Mamme Rochel died 
between
Pesach & Shavuos when the ground was dry.

(see רש"י Breishis 48:7 who agrees with the פסיקתא)

 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              קול ברמה נשמע

WHERE is קבר רחל located? 
         

According to the some ראשונים, 
(רלב"ג, חזקוני, *רמב"ן פרשת ויחי)

קבר רחל is not in בית לחם (south of Yerushalayim)

but in רמה north* of Yerushalayim- (Ramat Shlomo-Shuafat area)


*רש"י in פרשת ויחי quotes the פסיקתא רבתי " Yaakov told
Yosef that he buried רחל on the road ע"פ הדיבור so she will
help her children when נבוזארדן will take captive the
בני ישראל from ירושלים to בבל.
When they will be passing קבר רחל, then רחל will
come out from her קבר and cry -  'רחל מבכה על בניה וכו--"

If קבר רחל is in Bais Lechem (south of ירושלים)  they would not
be passing her קבר on the way to בבל which is north of ירושלים.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      HOW CAN YOU DAVEN AT  קבר רחל?
                      

The גשר החיים כ"ט ס"ק י"א  writes,"R. Shmuel Salant  zt"l

was מקפיד not to Daven in the inner room of קבר רחל,

so as not be עובר the איסור of לועג לרש".