Did Isaiah Prophesize the collapse of France at the End of Days?

 

     

ס״ג

מִי־זֶ֣ה ׀ בָּ֣א מֵאֱד֗וֹם חֲמ֤וּץ בְּגָדִים֙ מִבׇּצְרָ֔ה זֶ֚ה הָד֣וּר בִּלְבוּשׁ֔וֹ צֹעֶ֖ה בְּרֹ֣ב כֹּח֑וֹ אֲנִ֛י מְדַבֵּ֥ר בִּצְדָקָ֖ה רַ֥ב לְהוֹשִֽׁיעַ׃

מַדּ֥וּעַ אָדֹ֖ם לִלְבוּשֶׁ֑ךָ וּבְגָדֶ֖יךָ כְּדֹרֵ֥ךְ בְּגַֽת׃

פּוּרָ֣ה ׀ דָּרַ֣כְתִּי לְבַדִּ֗י וּמֵֽעַמִּים֙ אֵֽין־אִ֣ישׁ אִתִּ֔י וְאֶדְרְכֵ֣ם בְּאַפִּ֔י וְאֶרְמְסֵ֖ם בַּחֲמָתִ֑י וְיֵ֤ז נִצְחָם֙ עַל־בְּגָדַ֔י וְכׇל־מַלְבּוּשַׁ֖י אֶגְאָֽלְתִּי׃

כִּ֛י י֥וֹם נָקָ֖ם בְּלִבִּ֑י וּשְׁנַ֥ת גְּאוּלַ֖י בָּֽאָה׃

וְאַבִּיט֙ וְאֵ֣ין עֹזֵ֔ר וְאֶשְׁתּוֹמֵ֖ם וְאֵ֣ין סוֹמֵ֑ךְ וַתּ֤וֹשַֽׁע־לִי֙ זְרֹעִ֔י וַחֲמָתִ֖י הִ֥יא סְמָכָֽתְנִי׃

וְאָב֤וּס עַמִּים֙ בְּאַפִּ֔י וַאֲשַׁכְּרֵ֖ם בַּחֲמָתִ֑י וְאוֹרִ֥יד לָאָ֖רֶץ נִצְחָֽם׃ {ס}        

Who is this coming from Edom, with crimson-stained garments from Bozrah? This one, glorious in His apparel, striding forward in the greatness of His strength?

"It is I, speaking in righteousness, mighty to save."

Why is Your clothing red, and Your garments like one who treads in a winepress?

"I have trodden the winepress alone, and from the nations no one was with Me. I trod them in My anger and trampled them in My wrath; their lifeblood spattered onto My garments, and I stained all My clothing.

For the day of vengeance was in My heart, and the year of My redemption had come.

I looked, but there was no helper; I was appalled that there was no one to support Me. So My own arm brought Me salvation, and My wrath sustained Me."

Both the Radak, and the Mezudas Dovid say that this a prophecy of what will occur at end of days! And this pasuk is one of the most dramatic prophetic visions in Isaiah. 

The figure (the RBS"O Himself) comes from Edom/Bozrah with garments reddened as though from a winepress,  the imagery symbolizes divine judgment upon the nations and redemption of God's people,

The "day of vengeance" and the "year of redemption" are presented together as part of God's final act of justice and deliverance.

The question is why "like a winepress?" 

Could Isaiah be referring to a nation that is considered the country that produces the world's finest wines, particularly in terms of prestige, quality and historical reputation?

Is Isaiah saying that at the end of days the RBS"O will begin the salvation with first  annihilating France, and not with an army or with any help from the outside!

The RBS"O is saying that France will be destroyed without an army but from within! 

Which is happening now

CBN The Lakewood WhatsApp Social Media Continues to spread Lies Against Israel

 

CBN caters to their Lakewood clientele, who are by in large Yeshivishe "naronim" who have been indoctrinated against the only Jewish State in the world, the home of the majority of the Jewish People! 

Know that since the Zionist State was established in 1948, not one Jew was ever arrested for learning Torah! Not One! Ever!

In fact, just today I was sitting in Kollel for appprox 9 hours, with Soldiers coming in and out for either Shachris, Mincha and Maariv, and I didn't see them arresting a single Kollel guy! 

To state as CBN wrote in the above captured tweet, that this Avreich was "taken into

custody on his Sheva Berachos "just because he was learning Torah" is an outrageous lie, and pure "rechilas"

He was arrested for not registering for the draft, not because he was learning, and he has his Gedoilim to thank for that! 

There is more to this story, he was been sought for over two years and was almost arrested last week at his home,

Either way to write that he was arrested "for learning Torah" is sheer chutzpah and how is anyone to believe anything that CBN scribbles?

The State this year alone granted close to a billion shekel to Moisdois Hatorah this year alone. The government finally woke up and are starting to cut those funds to these ungrateful people who live in this country and refuse to recognize it!

i see that  they decided to drag their aged Gedoilim all over the world in private Jets, every few weeks, to make up the deficit which of course is like beating a dead horse!

Could the Fiercely Anti-Zionist Rabbis Have Misunderstood God's Plan for Israel?

 

In this provocative and intense interview, Rabbi Yonatan Dorfman of the YouTube channel In the Valley of the Giants presses Rabbi Tovia Singer to confront the anti-Zionist theology of Satmar and elements of the Orthodox yeshiva world.

Did parts of the Orthodox world get it wrong? 

Rabbi Singer examines the theological arguments against Zionism and reveals how the State of Israel is playing an integral role in God's unfolding plan for the final redemption. 

A powerful discussion of Jewish faith, biblical prophecy, and Israel's extraordinary destiny.

The New York Times Distorts the Record on Israel’s Founding in 1948

 

The New York Times recently published an erroneous claim regarding the 1948 War and the making of the Palestinian refugee problem. In an Oct. 5, 2026, guest essay entitled “AIPAC Has Failed,” Eric Alterman writes:

The US State Department consistently tried to pressure Israel to take a more generous attitude toward the roughly 750,000 Palestinians it had expelled before and during its war of independence — what Palestinians call the Nakba, or “catastrophe.” [Emphasis Added]

That all 750,000 Palestinians were expelled, as opposed to fled, is an inaccurate claim.

Many researchers, including both Israeli and Palestinian historians, have demonstrated this. Moreover, multiple media outlets, including Agence France Presse, Guardian, and Reuters Arabic have previously corrected the identical error.

Benny Morris, a top historian on the subject, notes that the refugee problem was created out of war, not out of some grand Israeli master plan. There were some limited expulsions of Arabs by Israeli forces, but many Arabs fled out of fear and uncertainty that war causes. Aside from Israeli actions and intentions, Morris writes:

It is also worth remembering that a large proportion of those [Palestinians] who became refugees fled their towns and villages not under direct Israeli threat or duress. Tens of thousands – mostly from well-to-do and elite families – left the towns in the war’s early months because of the withdrawal of the British administration, the war-filled chaos that followed, and the prospect of Jewish rule. And, in the following months, hundreds of thousands fled not under Jewish orders or direct coercion though, to be sure, most sought to move out of harm’s way as Zionist troops conquered town after town and district after district. And most probably believed that they would be returning home in a matter of months if not weeks, perhaps after the Arab armies had crushed Israel.

Morris’s work is highly influential and other historians have echoed it.

The scale of the Palestinian departure had taken Israeli leaders, including hardliners, by surprise. Despite whatever attitudes they had towards the Arabs, “Palestinian flight during the first stage of the war left the Israelis aghast,” as Israeli historian Anita Shapira recounts. To Israelis, the events were simply unfathomable.

Detractors would point out that Israel activated Plan D/Tochnit Dalet around April and May of 1948. It called for the Israeli forces to conquer Arab villages. Expulsion and destruction of villages was to take place only if the inhabitants and whichever fighting forces residing among them would resist, unless they surrendered.

Morris writes, “Townspeople and villagers usually fled their homes before or during battle and Haganah commanders rarely had to decide about, or issue, expulsion orders.”

Even when Plan D was in effect, “mass exodus of the Arabs was neither intended nor expected by either the Arabs or the Jews.” There is no evidence of a master Israeli plan for mass expulsion of Arabs and Plan D never was an official decision of any Israeli body.

Furthermore, by the time Israel activated Plan D, at least 70,000-75,000 Palestinians, often belonging to urban elite circles, had left the country in fear of the oncoming conflict and in the hope of returning to a calmer Palestine.” This mass departure, taking place between September 1947 and March 1948, produced even more anxiety and insecurity among the Palestinian population that already seeing the fighting and the withdrawal of the British rule. The situation was chaotic. It is no wonder why many others followed the elites and left in the following months.

But it is not accurate that Israel expelled all the refugees. This argument ignores the realities of war and the twilight of British rule. The Times should correct the article. The outlet did not respond to a correction request and a follow up email from CAMERA.

Omri Tubi is a US media research analyst for CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis), where a version of this article appeared.

Israel plotting another ‘Operation Grim Beeper’ style attack

 

The Iran War may kick into high gear after the midterms, as a third aircraft carrier is headed to the region and President Trump has warned all hell could break loose.

The USS Theodore Roosevelt, a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, was making its way to the Middle East – joining two other carrier task forces in the region, the USS George Washington and the USS George W. Bush.

President Trump told Kansas City radio station KCMO Friday that the war is “going to get wrapped up soon” – without specifying how.

What Britain owe the Jewish People

 

by Daniel Winston

In my previous article in these pages, I argued that Britain broke its legal obligations to the Jewish people under the Mandate at the very moment those obligations meant the difference between life and death, and that it owes a moral and financial debt it has never acknowledged. 

Here is the full accounting. It is a debt no one has ever been asked to pay, and Britain is not the only debtor.

Counting only documented deaths, documented confiscations and formulas that governments themselves have accepted, Britain, seven Arab states and Iran owe the Jewish people and the State of Israel roughly $738 billion.

 A fuller accounting of Britain's betrayal runs into the trillions. 

Against this stands the Palestinian Arab claim of $400 billion and more for what Arabs left behind in 1948. That number rests on a genocidal war of annihilation the Arabs launched, on an exodus of local Arabs meant to clear the field for it, and on a bill for hurt feelings.

For 75 years the world has read only one set of books, and mostly misread it. It is time to open all of them.

I use three yardsticks, none of them my own invention. I price lives at the value of a statistical life that the United States Department of Transportation applies in its own regulatory work, currently $14.2 million.

🚨 CHANGE YOUR CLOCKS

 

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by pcb4363 (@pcb1735)

FJJ the Flatbush Newspaper that refuses to carry Photos of Jewish Women Prints Photos of 2 Shiksas

 

Rav Dov Landau In$tructed Degel HaTorah To Explore Alliance With Ei$enkot

 

Charedie will sit with Nazis if that's what's needed to get money to the Moisdois Which is Inyani De"yomeh as the letters מוסד are the same as סדום!

Eisenkot is debating whether he should sit with the Arabs or sit with Charedim! This in itself should startle any reasonable person, but the Charedie Gedoilim, like the Arabs do not recognize the State and consider the entire Knesset as a bunch of "meenim & apikorsim" but will sit there anyway as a means to drain the system! As of now MK Yaakov A$her denied it .....

A dramatic report suggesting that Degel HaTorah could consider joining forces with the center-left bloc led by Gadi Eisenkot has triggered a political controversy in Israel, with senior United Torah Judaism officials quickly denying that any such instructions were issued.

Yishai Cohen, political editor of Kikar HaShabbat and a panelist on Channel 12, reported Friday that HaGaon HaRav Dov Landau had instructed Degel HaTorah’s Knesset representatives to open discussions with the so-called “change bloc” as Israel’s political parties explore possible coalition arrangements following this week’s elections.

According to Cohen’s report, Degel HaTorah does not consider itself automatically committed to either the Netanyahu bloc or the opposition, with the overriding priority being the protection of yeshiva bochurim and the resolution of the ongoing military draft crisis.

The report raised the possibility that Degel HaTorah could consider cooperation with Eisenkot if his bloc agreed to the party’s demands regarding the status of Bnei Yeshivos.

Such a move would represent a significant development in Israeli coalition politics, potentially challenging the longstanding political alignment between the Chareidi parties and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s right-wing bloc.

However, the office of United Torah Judaism MK Yaakov Asher, a senior Degel HaTorah representative, moved quickly to reject the report.

“No such instruction was given. We have not even visited the Gedolei Yisroel since the elections,” Asher’s office said in a statement.

The denial directly contradicts the claim that Rav Landau had already issued instructions to begin negotiations with the opposition.

The controversy comes as Israel’s political parties assess the final election results and the prospects for forming a government.

With neither major political bloc holding a straightforward path to a governing majority, the Chareidi parties could play a pivotal role in determining the composition of the next coalition.

The military draft issue remains one of the most significant obstacles in coalition negotiations, particularly following months of arrests of yeshiva bochurim and growing outrage throughout the Chareidi community.

For Degel HaTorah, securing protections for Bnei Yeshivos and ensuring the continued ability of bochurim and avreichim to learn Torah without facing military prosecution remain central political demands.

Zera Shimshon Parashat Vayera

 

Analysis of the Israeli election 2026

 

by Hillel Fuld

The final numbers are still not in and things can still shift, but the left anti Bibi crowd, and I call them that because that’s literally all they stand for and the politicians who make up the bloc have zero in common other than the hatred of Bibi, well, those people have been embarrassingly defeated.

Does that mean that Bibi won a major victory here?

No.

I don’t see how he forms a coalition unless one of the losers agrees to put his Netanyahu derangement syndrome aside and actually put the interests of this nation over his ego.

But what’s undeniable is that the left was totally humiliated here.

Why?

Because for three years, all they talked about is how Bibi is responsible for 10/7.

They called him a traitor.

They attacked his wife.

His kids.

They called him a liar constantly.

They incited against him more than anyone ever incited against any Israeli PM.

Yes, even that Israeli PM.

Before that, they obsessed over the judicial reform and how Bibi is trying to create a dictatorship.

Then they spent years making up fake accusations against Bibi about him stealing bugs bunny dolls and cigars, all accusations that ended up falling apart.

They also managed to bring in tens of thousands of voters from outside of Israel to bring Bibi down.

And guess what. Bibi got the most votes in the election. That’s clear.

His bloc also got more support than theirs.

Here’s the thing.

Unless one of them agrees to sit with Bibi, we are going back to another elections and guess what happens then.

Those tens of thousands aren’t coming back to vote again.

The Arabs who voted at an absurd rate will be a warning sign for those who either didn’t vote or didn’t vote for the right.

If there’s another election, the Arab parties will not get this many votes, especially after the speeches some of them gave declaring proudly how loyal they are to Gaza and not to Israel.

To me, the biggest loser here is actually Bennett.

He can easily join Bibi and create a stable coalition. After all, he claims he’s right wing.

Someone who is right wing doesn’t sit with someone like Ya’ir Golan who famously said Israel kills babies as a hobby and called the IDF an occupation army.

Wanna talk about treason? Yea…

So either Bennett wakes up and actually shows that he has any values left or the country goes back to elections and you can be sure, Bennett will never be this strong again.

Lieberman can also sit with Bibi if he puts Israel ahead of his ego.

Forget Lapid. He’s just a nobody.

So did Bibi win? Not exactly. (Unless of course these last votes add multiple mandates to the Likud.)

But did the anti Bibi crowd lose? They didn’t just lose.

They were made totally fools of, and rightfully so.

Maybe they’ll learn the lesson and actually focus on something positive with a candidate that is somewhat capable instead of obsessing over Bibi, but let’s be honest, they won’t learn the lesson and they’ll continue to lose because of it.

There has never been and there never will be another campaign that is this organized and coordinated and that has one goal, to vilify Bibi.

And it didn’t only come from within Israel. It was a global attempt.

Parliaments, politicians, journalists, activists, they all spent every resource they have to bring Bibi down.

They failed. They all failed.

And the funniest part? All those loser politicians gave victory speeches last night before the real numbers came in and proved that all their propaganda channels were dead wrong and channel 14, the channel that Golan wants to shut down, they were the only channel with relatively accurate results.

So, all around, the anti-Bibi crowd came out looking really dumb here but anyone with a brain and a basic understanding of geopolitics and marketing should have expected this. I know I did.

The people have spoken and the obsession with bringing Bibi down yielded zero results.

Now let’s see if one of these losers actually steps up to the plate and acts responsibly. Not counting on it.

New York, May 10, 1933 New Yorkers marched through Manhattan to protest Nazi persecution in Germany.

New York, May 10, 1933

New Yorkers marched through Manhattan to protest Nazi persecution in Germany.

The march was organized by the American Jewish Congress. Rabbis, war veterans and other demonstrators passed City Hall as the city watched.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Jewish Reels (@jewishreelsarchive)

36 Years Since the Assassination of Rav Meir Kahane and His prediction about the Arab Votes have come true!

 

36 Years Since the NYC Assassination of Meir Kahane

Today, Wednesday, י״ז חשון, was the 36th yahrtzeit of Meir Kahane. He was assassinated in New York at the age of 58.

Born in Flatbush, Brooklyn in 1932, Kahane later founded the Jewish Defense League (JDL) in 1968 under the defining banner of "Never Again," organizing self-defense initiatives to protect vulnerable urban Jewish communities from violence and intimidation.

After immigrating to Israel in 1971, he entered public office and served as a Member of the Knesset leading the Kach party, where he consistently warned against concessions and called for total Jewish sovereignty across the Land of Israel. While the party was banned in 1988 from running, Kahane’s message and theology still lives strong.

On November 5, 1990 (18 Cheshvan 5751), Kahane was assassinated in Manhattan by Egyptian-born Islamic terrorist El Sayyid Nosair, an early act of radical Islamic terrorism on American soil that foreshadowed the global wave of jihadist violence in the decades that followed.

Following his assassination, the Kach party split, with Kahane Chai, started by Meir Kahane’s son Binyamin Zev, breaking away from the main faction.

Israel banned both Kach and Kahane Chai in 1994, a month after a Kach supporter shot and killed twenty-nine Muslims at a mosque.

Binyamin Kahane was killed along with his wife by Palestinian terrorists in a drive-by shooting in Samaria in December 2000, essentially proving his father’s point.

Meir Kahane had advocated strongly for the expulsion of Arabs from Israel, including Judea and Samaria, and proposing that those who refused to leave willingly should be forcibly deported or pressured to go. In a 1985 speech in Los Angeles, he stated that his name meant "terror to Arabs".

He felt strongly that Arabs living in Israel, including Judea and Samaria, were enemies of Jews and Zionism. He frequently asserted that Zionism requires a permanent Jewish majority, meaning that if Arabs were allowed full democratic participation, it would cease to be a Jewish state. During his time in the Israeli Knesset as the leader of the Kach party, he introduced bills calling for the physical separation of Jews and non-Jews and the removal of Arab populations.

Throughout his life, Kahane delivered razor-sharp warnings regarding security, national deterrence, and absolute self-reliance that continue to resonate today:

"I prefer a powerful and proud Jewish State that is hated by the entire world than an Auschwitz that is loved by one and all."

"Never, ever deal with terrorists.  Hunt them down and, more important, mercilessly punish those states and groups that fund, arm, support, or simply allow their territories to be used by the terrorists with impunity."

"The poor Palestinians who today kill Jews with explosives and firebombs and stones are part of the same people who when they had all the territories they now demand be given to them for their state—attempted to drive the Jewish state into the sea."

"For so long as the Jew has even one ally, he will be convinced—in his smallness of mind—that his salvation came from that ally.  It is only when he is alone—against all of his own efforts and frantic attempts—that he will, through no choice, be compelled to turn to G-d."

Kahane’s message remains clear: total strength, national deterrence, and uncompromising pride are the fundamental guarantees of Jewish survival.