Israeli Ambassador to the UN Sends a Letter to ‘Kock im' Moon’ Regarding Latest String of Attacks against Israelis

Kock im" Uhn

The following letter prepared by Israel Ambassador to the United Nations Dan Prosor, was sent to UN Secretary-General Ben Ki-Moon (aka Kock-im' Uhn) regarding recent attacks against Israelis. 

Following the series of terror attacks in the past week, Ambassador Prosor told the UN that such attacks are becoming part of a disturbing new pattern. This was written in mid-August following a number of terror attacks.

“We are witnessing a disturbing new pattern in which those seeking to murder Israelis take advantage of their humanity. These are acts that no decent person would tolerate.”

​”Excellency,

Today, a Palestinian terrorist approached Israeli security forces south of Nablus and told them that he was not feeling well and asked for water. When they invited him to approach, he drew a knife and stabbed one of the soldiers.

Just two days ago, a Palestinian man approached an Israeli soldier and asked him for some water. When the soldier turned to get him some, the terrorist assaulted him with a knife. Later that same day, another Palestinian stabbed an Israeli border policeman in the back during a routine security check.

Such attacks are becoming part of a disturbing new pattern in which those seeking to murder Israelis take advantage of their humanity. On June 19th of this year, I wrote to you about a Palestinian man who shot two 25 year old Israeli civilians at close range, killing one of them. The terrorist attracted the attention of his victims by asking for their assistance. He then pulled a gun out of his bag and shot the two in cold blood.

Attacks of this kind are especially outrageous because they take advantage of a person’s natural desire to help their fellow man in their time of need, in order to kill him. These are acts that no decent person would tolerate.

This type of attack is also especially dangerous. Not only do such attacks pose a grave threat for Israelis, they may well harm those Palestinians who are genuine in need of assistance.

We have also recently learned that Ahmad Najar, the man who initiated and planned the murder of Malachi Rosenfeld on June 29th of this year used the money paid to him by the PA to purchase the weapon that was used in the attack, and to train those who executed it. These funds were paid to the terrorist for the time he served in an Israeli jail for the crime of murdering six Israelis in 2004.

Once again, the Palestinian leadership is failing to take responsibility. Not only do they refuse to condemn these attacks, but they also fund people who serve time in prison for carrying them out.

I call on the Security Council to unequivocally condemn this latest series of terror attacks in a clear voice. I ask you to publicly call on the Palestinian Authority to condemn those responsible for these attacks, and to do everything in their power to prevent future attacks.

A timely and clear statement by the Security Council is crucial to prevent further deterioration and further suffering.”

Sick Chareidi savages in Yerushalyim urge shunning of Charedi soldiers in Pamphlets

Ok guys, continue giving money to  Israeli Schnorrers ...

I ask them first in a calm voice with a smile ... "So what do you think of the Chareidim in Uniform?" 

Most of them tell me "We are definitely against them"

that's when I throw them out!

A pamphlet distributed in the streets of  Charedi neighborhoods in Jerusalem names members of the community who are serving in the IDF and calls on residents to shun them.

The pamphlet contains the photos of ultra-Orthodox soldiers from the neighborhood who serve in the Givati infantry brigade.

Many Charedi neighborhoods in the capital have seen protests against growing Charedi enlistment in the army.

Ami throws Satmar Under the Bus!

In the August 5 edition of Ami Magazine, Yitzchok Frankfurter, writes in an editorial, titled "American Jewry's Perpetual Inertia," that anyone that advocates for the Iran Nuclear Deal is basically a "murderer."

Now, Mr Frankfurter knows very well the position of both Satmar Rabbis, which is, that not only is it forbidden for Jews to try to defeat this deal, but R' Aron Teitelbaum the leader of the Aroni faction of Satmar, actually sent letters to senators and congressman begging them to support the President on the Iran nuclear deal, because of Satmars' love of President Obama who gives them federal programs.

But in this editorial Frankfurter reminds his readers of "the complacency of American Rabbis," during WW2, specifically Stephen Wise, who though well connected failed to utilize his position to urge President Roosevelt to save European Jewry, because as Frankfurter puts it, his "absolute and complete love" for President Roosevelt!

Frankfurter continues and writes, 
"any layperson who offers an opinion on the Iranian nuclear threat in contradiction to that of the seasoned experts, may Heaven forbid, be guilty of the aforementioned offence [murder] multiplied by 6 million!"

Now, my readers know my prior position of Yitzchok Frankfurter and his magazine Ami, but in this editorial he actually makes sense and puts a dagger in Satmars back, and calls the Satmar Rabbis a bunch of "murderers" ....
He didn't actually say the word "Satmar"... but he meant them, because in the Chareidie world ... only Satmar backs the Iranian Nuclear deal!

I therefore placed Yitzchok Frankfureters photo dressed in a clown outfit further down on my sidebar..
If he continues making sense, maybe I'll put his Shtreimal back on!

Katie Holmes shooting a movie in the holy city of Monsey!

Yup .... Monsyeites are all excited because the famous 36 year old actress Katie Holmes ex-wife of Tom Cruise is shooting a film called "All We Had", around the corner from Bais Medrish Elyon, Yeshiva Bais Dovid and did I mention Mesivtah Bais Shraga?

Rumor has it that she will chap a Mincha at Viznitz, but it's not true!

The film centers on a single mother and her daughter who live together on the edge of poverty in the wake of the 2008 financial collapse.

The location in Monsey chosen for this filming was Ralphies Diner on Remsen Avenue, at the corner of Grove Avenue. The diner got a new name for the purpose of the movie:

"Tiny's Grub n' Go."

Satmar insults survivors by comparing Smartphones with Holocaust

 Satmar is now backing away from this ad, though it's from one of their own... they're calling him a "bit" of a lunatic!

Readers, don't fall for this garbage!

 Satmar does the same thing with the Neturei Karta, though they are on the same page in every single issue on Israel, they say, when asked, that the Neture Karta are lunatics! This is a strategic policy, just like when Arab terrorists shoot up a mall, they say that the terrorist  was a  "lone" terrorist!

The Neturei Karta is funded by Satmar! 

It is the Satmar crazy SHIT"ah that is breeding this vermin!

Just last week Kiryas Joel amended its admissions policy to exclude the children of women who own smartphones.

Now! I don't condemn them for opposing smartphones, but they compare the damage the cellphone does to the Holocaust..

An advertisement which used a Holocaust theme to decry smartphone usage in the ultra-Orthodox community has drawn severe criticism from diverse sources, with supporters of Holocaust survivors and the vehemently anti-smartphone Satmar hassidic both issuing strong statements against its message.

In the ad, images of which have been uploaded to social media, a line of ambulances moves down a road and stops at a gate emblazoned with the corporate logos of Apple and Motorola. A barbed wire fence extends from both sides of the gate, while overhead a metal sign proclaims “Smartphone macht frei.”

The take on the German phrase arbeit macht frei (work will make you free) – which stood above the entrances to concentration camps such as Auschwitz, Dachau, and Sachsenhausen – has a double meaning, as frei is also the Yiddish term for an irreligious person. Smartphones will make you abandon Judaism, the ad seems to be saying.

“The attached publication is not [an] official publication and is not in any literature from the school or community. This is being published by a loner who took upon himself to fight smartphones, and publishes very controversial and tasteless booklets,” said Rabbi Moshe Aaron Hoffman, a Satmar spokesman.

The ad in question was published by Kol Rabinovich, an independent organization that prints its own material and drops it off in local synagogues, Hoffman continued.

The proprietor of the organization is a “bit of a lunatic and people read [his material] just to have a good laugh.” However, “most synagogues” throw his material away as soon as it is dropped off, he continued.

“It’s not only offensive, it diminishes the work of the real community activists….no official Satmar publication prints his stuff.”

The insular hassidic sect recently made headlines when one of its flagship schools in the New York village of Kiryas Joel amended its admissions policy to exclude the children of women who own smartphones.

“Remember: We will not provide acceptance cards if you’re not in order with the technological rules,” the school’s administration advised in a letter to parents.

Despite several calls to its Yiddish language hotline, The Jerusalem Post was unable to reach Kol Rabinovich for comment.

Prominent Jews across the globe expressed shock at the use of such imagery.

“We are appalled when non-Jews use the Holocaust to promote something other than the Holocaust. It is no less appalling and wrong when Jews do it. This is outrageous and wrong. Insensitive and hurtful,” said Polish Chief Rabbi Michael Schudrich.

“This ad is in truly execrable taste,” said Menachem Rosensaft, a prominent survivors advocate who teaches genocide law at Columbia University and both of whose parents were imprisoned in Auschwitz.

“There seems to be no limit to the appalling capacity of some perverse individuals, clearly in this instance including Jews, to desecrate and profane Shoah imagery and, more importantly, Shoah memory. This ad is truly the functional moral equivalent of pornography. ‘Arbeit macht frei’ - ‘Work makes free’ - was the Nazi welcome inscribed over the entryway to Auschwitz. For anyone to so callously trivialize and exploit all the horrors and suffering this image epitomizes crosses every possible line of decency.”

Colette Avital, the head of the Center of Organizations of Holocaust Survivors, termed the ad “vulgar, tasteless, cheap and reprehensible” and called for Jewish communities abroad to combat such rhetoric as strongly as they combat anti-Semitism.

“I looked and looked again and could not believe that ultra-Orthodox people should be so insensitive and use imagery connected to the concentration camps. Meaning what? That the use of smartphones would annihilate Jews like the Nazis did?” The Simon Wiesenthal Center also panned the ad, calling it “yet another example of the misuse of Holocaust imagery or symbols for various causes, none of whose relevance approaches that of the Holocaust.”

“The objectionable use of the gates of Auschwitz to protest against smart phones is a reflection of the lack of respect for the Shoa of the sponsors of this ad and on the other hand, their obvious perception of the potency of Holocaust imagery among their target audience,” said Efraim Zuroff, the head of the SWC’s Jerusalem office.

Meet the Fake Hollywood “Jews” Who Endorse the Obama Deal

A group of 98 Hollywood Jews In Name Only, is endorsing the Obama Iran Deal disaster in an ad in a left-wing Jewish newspaper. 

It’s hilarious that the ad identifies those on the list as “American Jewish supporters of Israel,” when they are no such thing and never have been. These people have zero ties to Judaism (other than being born ethnically Jewish) and have never done a thing to support the State of Israel in any way, shape, or form.

Here is the full list of these self-hating frauds:

Mel Levine, Mickey Kantor, Eli Broad, Norman Lear, Frank Gehry, Stanley Gold, Irwin Jacobs

David Abel, James Adler, Daniel Attias, Elaine Mitchell Attias, Lawrence Bender, Peter and Barbara Benedek, Michael Berenbaum, Donna Bojarksy, Peter Braun, Rabbi Sharon Brous, David Bubis, Rabbi Ken Chasen, Eli Chernow, Rabbi Neil Comess-Daniels, Bruce and Toni Corwin, Geoffrey Cowan, Bert Deixler, David Fisher, William and Patricia Flumenbaum, Terry Friedman, Abner Goldstine, Rabbi Joshua Levine Grater, Arthur Greenberg, Earl Greinetz, Richard and Lois Gunther, Stephen Gunther, Janet Halbert, Michael Hrischfeld, Elaine Hoffman, Jane Jelenjo and Bill Norris, Charles Kaplan, Marty Kaplan, Steven Kaplan and Janet Levine, Glenn and Miriam Krinksy, Luis and Lee Lainer, Mark Lainer, Peter Landesman, Shawn Landres, Shari Leinwand, Irwin Levin, Peachy Levy, Rabbi Richard N. Levy, Mike Medavoy, Douglass Mirell, Charles Mostov, Allan and Nicole Mutchnik, David N. Myers, Mark and Marsha Novak, Rabbi Arnold Rachlis, Carolyn Ramsay, Gene Reynolds, Victoria Riski and David W. Rintels, Fredric D. Rosen, Rick Rosen, Monica and Philip Rosenthal, Ranni John Rosove, Thomas Safran, Dena Schechter, Rabbi Chaim Seidler-Feller, Larry Shapiro, Abby Sher, Richard Siegel, Glenn Sonnenberg, Carolyn Strauss, Bradley Tabach-Bank and De Dee Dorksind, David A. Thorpe, Larry Title and Ellen Shavelson, Matthew Velkes, Hope Warschaw, Rick Wartzman, Matthew Winer, Sandford and Karen Wiener, Daniel Weiss, Marcie and Howard Zelikow and Michael Ziering.

98 soulless, traitorous bastards. 

Back in the day, in 1943, they had a different name: kapo.

Oh, and Peachy Levy? How on earth can I take anyone named, “Peachy,” seriously?

Are we to assume that Norman Lear and the rest of them read all that, word for word, and if they did, are we to assume that, in their careful consideration, this work is so perfect that it is ready for production? No rewrite necessary? Are there no plots and sub-plots that, according to the language of the trade, needs more work?

No, after careful study on their yachts and then sharing lunch at Spago, they concluded that they know best.

They know better …better than the nuclear physicists who declare the deal a flop favorable only to the mullahs of Iran.

Or is it that these Jewish Liberals remain so gaga for Obama that they don’t care who lives or dies, so long as Liberalism lives?

That’s got to be it because nothing else makes sense.

Hemingway never liked the movies they made from his novels. He was fond of giving the following advice – “Stick to what you know.”

Otherwise, we might add, you risk making complete fools of yourselves.

Rabbi Riskin Clarifies: Converts Must Keep Torah Commandments

Rabbi Stav and Rabbi Riskin

Rabbi Shlomo Riskin responded to reports Monday that some of the rabbis on the new independent conversion courts do not require converts to obligate themselves to a full religious lifestyle. 

Riskin, the Chief Rabbi of Efrat, was named by Haaretz as one such rabbi who recognizes converts who commit to a "traditional" lifestyle in place of the Orthodox lifestyle demanded of them by the Chief Rabbinate. 

"The headlines do not match my words," Riskin stressed. "I am all for observance of the commandments and the genuine and meaningful process that leads to it." 

"My position is that the convert, like all Jews, is in a constant and life-long process of learning and deepening [his knowledge] of the Torah, halakha and the commandments," he added. 

According to Riskin, "construing my position in any other way is misleading and a simplistic interpretation that ignores the many layers and nuances of the issue."

Rabbi David Stav, head of the Tzohar organization and a key rabbi leading the new independent courts, told Arutz Sheva on Sunday that "our court doesn't move a millimeter from the instructions of the Torah greats in their various generations, Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, Rabbi (Yitzhak) Herzog, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef."

"Those that are defaming us today, supposedly in the name of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, instead of conducting a fair dialogue, are guilty of slander, as was done to Rabbi (Shlomo) Goren and Rabbi (Avraham Yitzhak) Kook."

"There are people here who really want their children to be Jewish, and I hope the day is not far when (Chief Sephardic) Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef will also recognize our court which works according to the halakhic minutiae, and will invite us to work under the auspices of the Chief Rabbinate," said Rabbi Stav.

Rabbi Stav Gets Police Protection Following Threats After The Launch Of 'Giur K’halacha

Is this our Torah? A Rav has an opinion different than them, so the opposition wants to physically harm him?
Who really knows what "Giur K"halacha" means?
Wearing fur from a dead animal on your head still doesn't make you the final decider...even if you have the Sfardim on your side....
In all of Shas we always had "Yechidim" that ruled differently than the majority, did the "Yechidim" need police protection? Many times in Shas we actually paskin like a "Yachid"! 
I'm not advocating Rabbi Stav's position, but to harm him because he doesn't agree with the Eida Hachareidis, or the Chief Rabbis?
What message to our children is this? "We don't agree with the Rabbi so we will beat the hell out of him?"

Rabbi David Stav

The Shoham police force will increase patrols close to and around the home of Rabbi David Stav, the town’s municipal chief rabbi, due to a concern for his safety following the launch of a new network of conversion courts last week which Stav helped found.
‎
The launch of the new conversion courts, called Giur K’halacha, created a fierce media storm in the haredi press, with advocates of a strict, centralized system under the chief rabbinate heavily criticizing Stav for what they perceive to be a an overly lenient approach to conversion which would create false converts who could then intermarry with Jewish Israelis. 

Proponents of the new courts argue that their conversions will comply with Jewish law but make use of leniencies for conversion outlined by various rabbinic authorities in the past to convert minors, with parental consent, from the immigrant community from the former Soviet Union. 

In reaction to the new courts, the haredi weekly newspaper Ba’kehillah on its front page last week labelled Stav “a danger to Judaism, a danger to the rabbinate, a danger to the Torah,” and said that he threatened “the walls of religion

Last week’s edition of the Yom L’Yom weekly newspaper, the mouthpiece of the Shas party, called the new conversion system “the rabbinical courts of the Reform with a yarmulke.”

On Thursday last week at a Bar Mitzvah celebration, Rabbi David Yosef, a member of the Shas Council of Torah Sages made the same comment.

Speaking to the Post last week, Stav spoke out against the tone of the criticism against him and the other founders of Giur K’halacha, accusing the haredi media of “incitement” and saying that they had “thrown off any and all restraint.”

On Saturday night, Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef, a brother of David Yosef, referenced the controversy for the first time, and claimed that the approach of the new courts was not in accordance with Jewish law.

“A person whose mother and father go to church every Sunday,” said Yosef in reference to the immigrant community from the former USSR who would not give their converted children any Jewish education or life.

Rabbi Seth Farber of the ITIM organization which helped create Giur K’halacha, labelled Yitzhak Yosef’s characterization of the immigrant community as a “populist stereotype,” and said that the new courts would not convert a child if there was not a commitment by the parents that the child would not practice any other religion and would provide him with some form of Jewish education. 

“Most immigrant families see themselves as Jewish, they don’t go to church, and are simply looking to certify their Jewishness and become full members of the Jewish community, for which there is an available halachic solution,” said Farber. 

Speaking to the Post last week, Chairman of the Jewish Agency Natan Sharansky criticized the Chief Rabbinate for its stance on conversion, its apparent opposition to Giur K’halacha, and its opposition to a government resolution passed in the last government but repealed by the current coalition to liberalize the state conversion system. 

“They want to keep a monopoly and to preserve their own importance but it’s not control which gives power,” said Sharansky, arguing that rabbinic attitudes to conversion had changed in accordance with Jewish political realities throughout history. 

Sharansky said that the chief rabbinate “would have more influence” if it recognized this principle and allowed rabbis with ordination from the Chief Rabbinate, such as those who established Giur K’halacha, to adopt this position.

Speaking to The Jerusalem Post last week, Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, another of the founders of Giur K’halacha also insisted that all conversions would conform strictly with Jewish law and called for the Chief Rabbinate to support the new system 

“We care about halacha [Jewish law] desperately, and what we are doing is in accordance with halacha, and are commensurate with the rulings of former chief rabbis of Israel,” said Riskin. “We are a strong Orthodox voice, and we cannot only have a haredi Orthodox voice on such issues, in light of the circumstances and fabric of Jewish society here in Israel,” the rabbi argued.

Matisyahu concert canceled in Spain because he refused to say that Arab Savages are entitled to a State!

It's ironic, the country that tortured Jews and then expelled them, is now banning a Jew from singing!

Jews for years would never even step into the country because of Spain's murderous past. 

Not to worry, the country will soon be taken over by ISIS! 

Now Read:

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is now causing a rift in reggae.

A music festival in Spain has canceled the performance of American Jewish rapper Matisyahu due to pressure from the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement and because the artist wouldn’t sign a pledge supporting the Palestinian state, according to Spanish media citing a statement from the event organizers.

Matisyahu, who is not Israeli but has visited the country several times, was to perform at the Rototom Sunsplash festival on Aug. 22. His concert slot was filled by Jamaican artist Etana.

The event director, Filippo Giunta, asked the singer on Thursday to issue a “signing statement or video” that expressed in a “very clear” way that Palestinians are entitled to their own state, according to Spanish newspaper El Pais. Other artists at the event threatened to cancel their own performances if Matisyahu was allowed to take the stage because he was “seen to represent Israel,” according to the Times of Israel. The local BDS movement accused Matisyahu of being a “Zionist” who supports the practice of “apartheid and ethnic cleansing.”

The festival, which began in 1994, has strong social justice overtones, including a particular affinity for promoting a Palestinian state. In a translated Facebook statement regarding the Matisyahu controversy, Rototom used the words “occupation” and “occupied” to describe Israel’s relationship with what the event organizers see as Palestinian territories. The festival’s website features a 2 ½-hour video focusing on pro-Palestinian activists, according to the Times of Israel.

The festival has a “social forum,” which has discussed the issue numerous times, according to the Facebook statement. Though permitting Matisyahu to perform his music, which is not characterized as pro-Israel but does draw on Jewish tradition, is apparently not part of that discussion.

Matisyahu, a Pennsylvania-born Jew whose real name is Matthew Miller, has not yet addressed the debate.

Ben Carson stands firm on suggestion that Obama has anti-Semitic views

Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson on Sunday defended his recent suggestion that President Obama holds anti-Semitic beliefs. 

Carson wrote in a recent op-ed piece for The Jerusalem Post that a speech this month by Obama in support of his Iran nuclear deal was “replete with coded innuendos employing standard anti-Semitic themes.”

Carson told “Fox News Sunday” that upon a recent visit to Israel that he “couldn’t find a single person there who didn’t feel that this administration had turned their backs on Israel.”

“All you have to do … is go to Israel and talk to average people on all ends of that spectrum,” continued Carson, a retired pediatric neurosurgeon and social conservative.

Carson, like most Republicans, does not support the deal, in part because he thinks it would put Israel in greater danger of a nuclear or non-nuclear attack by Iran.

President Obama has, since almost the start of his administration in 2009, been accused of weakening relations with Israel, considered the United States’ strongest Middle East ally.

The deal would lift billions in crippling economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for the rogue nation curtailing its nuclear development program, which critics say is to build a nuclear weapon.

Carson also argued Sunday that the president’s speech included anti-Semitic rhetoric because “anything is anti-Semitic that is against the survival of a state that is surrounded by enemies and by people who want to destroy them. … And to sort of ignore that and to act like everything is normal there and that these people are paranoid, I think that’s anti-Semitic.”

Third of Elul: HaRav Kook's Final Requests

HaRav Avraham Yitzchak Hacohen Kook, Israel's iconic first Asheknazic Chief Rabbi, returned his soul to G-d on the third of Elul.

It was the first of Elul, 5695 (1935), when Rabbi David Cohen (known as ‘the Rav HaNazir’) arrived at the guest house where Rav Kook was staying in Kiryat Moshe.

Exactly twenty years had passed since their first transformative encounter in Switzerland. 

This time he held in his hands a special document to show his dying master.

For twelve years, the Rav HaNazir had labored to organize Rav Kook’s writings into a systematic, comprehensive work. 

As his revered master lay on his death bed, he showed him the beginning fruits of his labor - the title page of the first volume of Orot HaKodesh. Rav Kook rejoiced; and he shed tears.

On the day of his death, Rav Kook motioned to his son, Rav Tzvi Yehudah, to come close. “Please pay off any outstanding debts. I do not want to owe anyone, not even the smallest amount.” He then made a second request: “Please prepare my writings for publication. But take care that the only title given to me is ‘rabbi.'”

With great effort, Rav Kook turned his face towards the scholars in the room. When it became clear that his soul would soon depart, the people cried out, “Shema Yisrael!” Rav Kook whispered after them, “Shema Yisrael,” breathing his final breath with the word echad - one. “The Eternal is one.”

The Rav HaNazir wrote:

“When the Rav passed away, We heard a heavenly voice. The voice called out, “Haim, ad olam!” ‘Life, forever!’ Even after completing life in this world, the soul continues, and it grows even stronger, with blessing, in eternal life.”

(Stories from the Land of Israel. Adapted from Malachim Kivnei Adam, p. 420; preface to Orot HaKodesh, pp. 24, 30 RavKookTorah.org)

Kold Kuts & Premiere Catering in Flatbush... Do they have Hashgacha or Not? What's the Story?

Both advertisements below appeared in this week's edition of the Yated!

Question: Is Kehilah Kashrus playing games? Or is Rabbi Nesanel Sommer playing games?

Is Kold Kuts/ Premiere Catering playing games?

Can the public eat at Kold Cuts?

Can the public eat at any event at The Agudah of Avenue L?

What "violations" happened in the kitchen of the Agudah of Avenue L that Kehilah Kashrus took off their Hashgacha?

And if there was a Kashrus Violation, why is Rabbi Nesanel Sommer still giving an Hashgacha?

Why did Premiere Catering have two Hashgachos in the first place?

If Premier Catering had Kehilah Kashrus as their Hashgacha, why did they need an outside Rabbi from Monsey as an additional Hashgacha?

Why wasn't the local Kehilah Kashrus enough?

And if Kehilah Kashrus continues to be vague about the circumstances because of Loshon Harah, why did they place a paid ad in the Yated? So now the Halacha of Loshon Harah is only partial? 

Whats the story folks?

More Questions:
Who is Kehilah Kashrus? Why isn't the ad signed? 
Will Premiere Catering refund all deposits for the events already booked?
Who is Rabbi Nesanel Sommer? How many establishments in Flatbush does he give an Hashgacha to?
How many establishments in Monsey where he actually lives does he give an Hashgacha?
The big question now is:
Can a goy eat at any of the establishments that Rav Sommer gives an Hashgacha?

Meir Kin the "bugeye" polygamist will contaminate Tiferes Rivka Wedding Hall on Sunday

Meir "Bugeye" Kin

Well guess who's'  coming for dinner on Sunday August 16 in Boro Park?
The arrogant sick deranged polygamist Bugeye Kin!
He is scheduled to show his ugly face at the Tiferes Rivka Wedding Hall, 1257 38th Street, Brooklyn, New York 11218. 

There will be a rally at the front of the hall...
If you don't want your daughter to wind up with a sick misogynist like bugeye, come support the rally!

Here see bugeye shlepping his latest victim past guests 

Hillary finally hands over her server—after it's been professionally wiped clean

After years of holding herself above the law, telling lie after lie, and months of flat-out obstruction, HIllary Clinton has finally produced to the FBI her server and three thumb drives. Apparently, the server has been professionally wiped clean of any useable information, and the thumb drives contain only what she selectively culled.

 Myriad criminal offenses apply to this conduct. Anyone with knowledge of government workings has known from inception that Hillary’s communications necessarily would contain classified and national security related information. Thanks to the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community, it is now beyond dispute that she had ultra-Top Secret information and more that should never have left the State Department.

 Equal to Ms. Clinton’s outrageous misconduct is that of the entire federal law enforcement community. It has long chosen to be deliberately blind to these flagrant infractions of laws designed to protect national security—laws for which other people, even reporters, have endured atrocious investigations, prosecutions, and some served years in prison for comparatively minor infractions. 

It’s high time for a special prosecutor to be named to conduct a full investigation into Ms. Clinton’s likely commission of multiple felonies, including a conspiracy with Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, and possibly others, to violate multiple laws. 

While the FBI and Department of Justice have willfully ignored Hillary Clinton’s outrageous conduct, they didn’t hesitate a minute to investigate and prosecute former CIA Director and national hero, General Petraeus. He was just tarred, feathered and ridden out of the CIA on a rail for sharing some information (his own notebook) with his biographer who was both in the military and had a top secret clearance. Yet, Petraeus did not have a secret server set up to house his classified and top secret information or digital satellite imagery; he destroyed nothing; and, there was no “leak.”

 But that’s not all. During the same years that Hillary was communicating about national security and world affairs off the grid, the Department of Justice has had no qualms threatening news reporters and prosecuting whistleblowers under the Espionage Act. To hell with the First Amendment and Supreme Court precedent, even the New York Times reported that this administration prosecuted more reporters and whistleblowers for “espionage” than all prior administrations put together.

 Remember Fox news reporter James Rosen? The Holder Justice Department not only seized his emails immediately and without his knowledge, they suggested he was a criminal “co-conspirator” in a leak case—under the Espionage Act—which carries a ten-year term of imprisonment. 

And they quickly indicted former House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Senator Menendez on extremely stretched or tortured views of vague criminal statutes and factual allegations of conduct that may well not be criminal. Senator Menendez can’t vacation with his best friend but Hillary Clinton and her “Foundation” can accept millions of dollars from foreign governments seeking to curry her favor. Yet there’s been no criminal investigation of Ms. Clinton and her cabal? 

They couldn’t seize her server months ago while it contained all the emails? They couldn’t put a stop to it from the beginning?

Oh right, I forgot. As the Wall Street Journal reported, Ms. Clinton had declined to allow an Inspector General at the State Department during her entire tenure—so there was no internal oversight. And oh yes, her name is Clinton, and she has long deemed herself above the law. The rules only apply to everyone else.

 But wait, there’s still more. The current Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, Leslie Caldwell, and her Chief of the Corporate Fraud Section, Andrew Weissmann, destroyed Arthur Andersen and its 85,000 jobs on unfounded charges of obstruction of justice for destroying documents the Supreme Court said it had no legal obligation to keep. The laws governing Ms. Clinton’s obligations are clear. Nonetheless, they haven’t even convened a grand jury to look into Ms. Clinton’s longstanding assertion that she wiped her server clean—of documents she was legally required to keep? 

On top of that, there can be little doubt that Eric Holder and other high-ranking FBI and DOJ officials themselves wrote Ms. Clinton at Clintonemail.com—not to mention countless communications with the President and “All His Muses”—Counter-terrrorism advisor Lisa Monaco, National Security Advisor Susan Rice, and then White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler (not to mention Valerie Jarrett)—about Benghazi and all other top secret and classified issues. The DOJ hasn’t subpoenaed the emails from any of the recipients—or the internet service providers? Or looked for them on the backup government servers of the accounts of all the recipients? And the State Department still today is making statements defending her?

 Not only did Ms. Clinton deliberately demonstrate disdain for the Federal Records Act and nullify the protections of the Freedom of Information Act, she violated the Espionage Act by having information relating to the national defense on her server at all. And her deliberate disregard for national security made the job of all hackers that much easier. 

As Andy McCarthy explained it in the National Review:
 In fact, the espionage act—which regulates the handling of intelligence by government officials — does not refer to classified information; it refers to information relating to the national defense. Moreover, it does not prohibit solely the transmission of such information; it criminalizes the communication, delivery, or transmission of that information; causing communication, delivery, or transmission of that information; permitting the removal of that information from its proper place of custody through gross negligence; permitting that information to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed through gross negligence; or, failing to make a prompt report to superiors in the government when an official knows that the information has been removed from its proper place of custody, communicated to someone not authorized to have it, lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed. See also Title 18 United States Code Section 2071 (prohibiting destruction of records). 

Aside from that, her knowledge and intent do not matter under some of these statutes and are indefensible under others. 

General Petraeus certainly had no criminal intent, and neither did any of the reporters. Ms. Clinton, however, established her entire system to avoid the law and in violation of the Espionage Act—as she and her co-conspirators removed all records from the State Department from its inception. 

Compounding her crimes, she knowingly and willfully destroyed whatever she wanted to destroy—despite or more likely because of—the incriminating information it contained and in the face of the Benghazi investigation.

 There’s still more. 

The countless false statements are crimes under 18 United States Code Section 1001—both by Ms. Clinton to Congress (“no classified information”) and in writing by Cheryl Mills to the State Department and just filed with Judge Sullivan—in which she states:

 “On matters pertaining to the conduct of government business, it was her practice to use the officials’ government email accounts.”

 We already know that Ms. Clinton used her personal server exclusively. Title 18 United States Code Section 1001 makes it a crime for anyone to “knowingly and willfully” falsify, conceal, or cover up “a material fact,” or make “any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or misrepresentation,” etc. 

Countless people are convicted felons under this statute—some for offenses that would never occur to anyone even to be a crime. And these are just a few of the possible statutes that it would appear to any federal prosecutor that she and her corrupt cabal violated. 

As Lt. Col. Ralph Peters had the guts to say last night on FoxNews, “Hillary Clinton is a criminal.” Military heroes who have risked their lives for this country have gone to prison for less. 

The Department of Justice’s selective prosecutions have been well-document. Its favoritism and targeting practices must end. As discussed on NewsMaxTV’s Hardline last night, it’s time for a national outcry for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate and indict Ms. Clinton’s flagrant violations of some of our most important laws. Anyone else would have been arrested by now. Until there is a massive change in this country, justice is a game.