No Greater Enemy to Israel than Obama: Trump

In response to FOX News’ Judge Jeannine Pirro’s question concerning Obama’s nuclear concessions to Iran, real estate mogul and former US presidential candidate Donald Trump said last week,

 “Probably, maybe from the beginning, there has never been a greater enemy to Israel than Barack Obama. It’s incredible.”

Trump then added, “The way he treats them. The way he’s speaking to them. I think, he treats our known enemies much better.”

Upon additional questioning by Judge Pirro, with regard to the United States Ambassador Susan Rice’s walking out of the UN before Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s General Assembly speech, and the Obama administration's reported “chicken***t” remark, Trump went on to explain:

“Look, they don’t like him, and they don’t like Israel. And, that’s what I say. I speak to friends of mine that are Jewish. I say, ‘How are you supporting this man?’ He’s the worst thing that ever has happened to Israel... 

What’s going to happen is, the way it’s going, Iran will have a nuclear weapon. And it’s very close. And, as soon as that happens, it’s a new ballgame.”

“The United States is so poorly run,” he said. “When you look at relations with other countries, in history it’s never been like this. 

Not one country do we get along with anymore. And, it’s not like we don’t get along because we are taking advantage of them. We don’t get along, and they’re taking advantage of us.”

Satmarism vs Zionism Part 5 "IDF are the Biggest Murderers"

Recently, Satmar published a booklet,  שמעו דבר ה׳  a transcript of Reb Yoel Teitelbaum's Shalosh Seudois Torelech given  during and immediately after the 6 day war, in 1967. The booklet is accompanied with an MP3 which is an actual  recording of the Rebbe speaking on Shabbos at Shaloish Seudois.
Notice the arrogant title of the booklet: 
"Listen to the Words of Hashem," 
as if the Satmar Shitah is the words of Hashem!

Click on links to read :
**Part 1 Titled "Chabad Shabsai Tzvi" 
was posted on Sept 7


**Part 2 Titled "Zionists Started the 6 Day War " 
was posted on Sept 8

**Part 3 Titled "Israeli Flag Avoda Zara "
was posted on Sept 11

** Part 4 Titled "Miracles" 
posted on Sept 14

PART 5

"THE IDF ARE THE BIGGEST MURDERERS"

Before I take the liberty to translate the piece, its really hard to believe that a "Manhig Yisrael" would spew such venom and hate against Jewish Children! It was the Satmar Rebbe that misled thousands of his Chassidim in pre-war Rumania into believing that Hitler would never touch Hungary, and advised those pathetic individuals not to use their Visas to America and to the then Palestine. The majority of his Chassidim that took his advice perished in the Holocaust!

He then took the opportunity to flee Romania with his family, on a Zionist train.

It could be that in hindsight, no one really knew, and that he really meant well, but to then turn around in 1967, when Jewish Soldiers in a Jewish Army, fought gallantly in self defense to protect  their own families and other Jews from the bloody murderous Arabs and call those very saviors, "Murderers"  is beyond the call of decency!

And now the loose translation:

"(Quoting from Malchai 2) 'If you do bad ... is that good in the eyes of Hashem?'
Lots of people say that the chayalim (IDF) are "bnei Olam Habah"  how can someone be sooo blind?

The Almighty saves Jews.... can anyone actually think that those who brought the sword to the world, are actually the saviors?

On the contrary! It would be a miracle if we could be saved from their hands! 

The biggest murderers are the IDF! They caused this war (1967) they brought the sword, literally, this war was needless!

I won't go into it at this time , this will all come out soon (that Israel started this war). 

Besides, 

all the troubles that Jews are going through, is only because of the establishment of the profane country!"

My Dear Readers:

I had to re-read it four times and then went to the recording, because I couldn't believe that a Shomer Torah U'Mitzvos would call another Jew, a "murderer"!

And not just a Jew, but a Jew who put on a uniform to put his life at risk to save other Jews!

This is the Satmar Shita! And this my friends has to be reputed and denounced.

The Satmar Rebbe refused to thank the Shliach that Hashem sent to save him....the Zionist, Rudolf Kastner!

But we will thank the Jewish Soldiers that put their necks on the line to make sure that there can be a Satmar Shul in Bnei Brak, so there can be a Satmar Shul in Meah Shearim.... 

Want to live to 120? Exercise more, eat healthily and take statins

Scientists haven't quite figured how we can live forever - but they now say they have worked out how we could make it to 120.

Experts suggest that exercising more, eating healthily and taking statins is the key to slowing the ageing process.

Although a 'wonder-pill' is not in sight, making lifestyle changes such as cutting down on sugar, salt and fat and taking drugs that already exist might work, says the Longevity Science Panel.

The group, which independently monitors evidence that explain changes in life expectancy and advises policymakers, found doing so took the average lifespan from 80 to 84.

The 'What is ageing? And how do we delay it?' report states that at present few people live to around 110 - but by making these adjustments they predict that the healthiest individuals could live to 120.

It explains that ageing happens because of problems in cell division - an essential function which leads to growth, organ development and the replacement of damaged cells.

But it is errors that occur in this natural process that impacts on ageing, according to experts, along with lifestyle factors like smoking and drinking.

Over-eating is said to cause a rise in cell mutation because it speeds up cell division.

When cells divide they also shorten the protective caps called telomeres and consequently once they reach a certain size they stop dividing entirely. 

This process is known as senescence, which when it is built up in an organ it prevents the ability to repair damage and causes wrinkles and age spots.

But the panel found this process can be slowed down by eating well, exercising and taking drugs which impact on pathways in the body. 

Dame Karen Dunnell, Chair of the Longevity Science Panel, said: 'From this research we have been able to build up a picture of the latest developments in this area. 

'The experts tended to agree on which possible factors are important in understanding the biology of ageing. 

'However, they did not necessarily agree on which are the most important components of the ageing process, or on which interventions might have the greatest potential for extending lifespan.' 

Tests revealed that a Mediterranean diet and possible calorie restriction lowered the incidence of age-related disease.

Drugs such as statins, which have an anti-inflammatory effect in addition to lowering cholesterol, were also found to delay the ageing process.

While the drug rapamycin, which has been shown to regulate cell division, increased the lifespan of mice by up to 26 per cent.

And resveratrol, which comes from red wine and is sold in dietary supplements, extended the life in simple animals such as yeast, nematodes and killifish, but results have been inconsistent in other animals including mice and flies.

Richard Faragher, professor of Biogerontology at the University of Brighton, told The Sunday Telegraph that living healthier for longer was more important than increasing lifespan.

'Ageing occurs because the mechanisms which keep us in good health fail over time. 

'After a variable number of divisions, cells will stop dividing and start to do bad stuff. 

'So, in effect, all age related diseases are being driven by a few mechanisms which if you could control them, could be the difference between somebody hobbling down the street, or jogging past you.' 

According to the Office for National Statistics, life-expectancy at birth in England increased between 1981 and 2010 from 71 to 78 in men and 77 to 82 in women.

The panel concluded that longevity will continue to increase in the next 10 years but the rate is likely to slow down.

The day a Holocaust survivor got revenge on his tormentor

Martin Greenfield, an 84-year-old Holocaust survivor, owns and operates Martin Greenfield Clothiers in Brooklyn, NY.

He survived the savagery of the Holocaust, made it to America with barely a penny and became a world-famous tailor in Brooklyn, dressing celebrities and presidents. In his new memoir, “Measure of a Man,” Martin Greenfield tells the story of his extraordinary life. In this excerpt, he explains how the concentration camps nearly stripped him of his humanity at age 16 — and the day he got it back.

While at Buchenwald, the SS assigned me to work in the munitions factory. But early one morning after roll call, a soldier placed me on a 12-prisoner team to perform repairs outside the camp in nearby Weimar.

Working in the city was a welcome distraction from camp life. Sometimes you got lucky and spotted a potato in a field or smuggled a trinket to trade for food. Either way, it was a chance to see the sky, escape the stench of rotting corpses, and confirm that there was still a world beyond the barbed wire.

We loaded our gear and marched the few miles to Weimar. The soldiers stopped us in front of a bombed-out mansion, home to the mayor of Weimar. A big black Mercedes sat out front. The soldiers commanded us to sift the rubble, clear the debris, and begin repairs on the mansion.

I walked alone to the back of the estate to assess the damage. Dusty piles of broken bricks lay scattered across the yard. Seeing the cellar door ajar, I slowly opened it. A shaft of sunlight filled the dank cellar. On one side of the space sat a wooden cage wrapped in chicken wire. I walked closer and noticed two quivering rabbits inside the cage.

“They’re still alive!” I said to myself with surprise.

Inside the cage were the remains of the rabbits’ dinner. I unlatched the cage and pulled out a wilted leaf and carrot nub. The lettuce was browning and slimy, the carrot still moist from the rabbits’ gnawing. Excited, I wolfed down the lettuce and tried to crack the chunk of carrot in half with my teeth.

My luck was short-lived. “What are you doing?” a voice yelled.

I whipped my head around toward the door. A gorgeous, smartly dressed blond woman holding a baby stood silhouetted in the door frame. It was the mayor of Weimar’s wife.

“I . . . I found your rabbits!” I stammered with a cheerful nervousness. “They’re alive and safe!”

“Why in the hell are you stealing my rabbits’ food?” barked the woman. “Animals!” I stood silent and stared at the floor.

“I’m reporting this immediately!” she said, stomping away. My heart pounded in my emaciated chest. A few minutes later, an SS soldier ordered me to come out of the cellar. I knew what was coming, and the knowing made it all the worse.

“Down on the ground, you dog! Fast!” yelled the German. He gripped his baton and bludgeoned my back. I do not know whether the mayor’s wife watched the beating. Given her cruelty, why would she want to miss it? On the hike back to Buchenwald, I replayed the scene over and over in my mind.

How could a woman carrying her own child find a walking skeleton saving her pets and have him beaten for nibbling on rotten animal food? I thought.

In that moment, my numbness to death melted. In its place rose an alien blood lust, a hunger for vengeance unlike any I had ever known. The surge of adrenaline and rush of rage felt good inside my withered frame.

Then and there I made a vow to myself: If I survived Buchenwald, I would return and kill the mayor’s wife.

On April 11, 1945, 3:15 p.m., the Allies liberated Buchenwald.

Physically, I was free. Emotionally, I was in chains. I’d made a promise to myself. And I intended to keep it.

I located two Jewish boys who were well enough to make the walk to Weimar. I told them what the woman did and what I was prepared to do about it. We could rummage machine guns from the mountain of German weapons seized by the inmates and Americans that lay in piles on the Appelplatz.

The streets outside camp were electric with an ominous sense of disquiet. A smattering of prisoners in striped pajamas ambled in search of noncamp food. I kept my eyes open for SS. We gripped our guns and got to Weimar as quickly as possible.

My heartbeat quickened the closer we got to the mayor’s house. Pent-up rage from all I had seen and experienced surged through me. Killing the mayor’s wife could not repay the Nazis for the
terror they had inflicted on us. But it was a start.

We walked a few miles before turning down the street the mayor’s home was on. I pointed to a house several paces down the road: “I think that’s it.” The big black Mercedes was not out front.

It took me a moment to make sure I had the right house.

“The car isn’t here. Looks like the house is empty,” I said. “The plan is we take our guns and go in through the side door. Then we hide and wait so I can kill the blonde bitch that had me beaten.”

The boys nodded.

We crept up to the side door. I slowly turned the knob. It was unlocked. I entered the house quietly, with my gun drawn. The boys fell in behind me and eased the door shut. We stepped softly to mute the sounds of our wooden clogs on the floor.

“Hello?” a voice around a corner said. “Hello?”

Just then the beautiful blond woman turned the corner and let out a screech. She had the baby in her arms again.

“Don’t shoot!” she screamed. “Don’t shoot!”

“Remember me?!” I yelled. “Do you?!”

Her blond tresses shook violently. She hid her face behind her upraised hand as if shielding herself from the sun.

“You had me beaten because of the rabbits. I’m here to shoot you!” I said, sounding like an SS.

“No! Please!” she quavered. “The baby, please!”

I aimed the machine gun at her chest. The baby wailed. My finger hovered above the trigger.

“Shoot her!” one of the boys said. “Shoot her!” The woman’s outstretched hand trembled in the air. My heart pounded against my chest like a hammer.

“Shoot her!” the other boy yelled. “That’s what we came here for! Do it!”

I froze. I couldn’t do it. I could not pull the trigger. That was the moment I became human again. All the old teachings came rushing back. I had been raised to believe that life was a precious gift from God, that women and children must be protected.

Had I pulled the trigger, I would have been like Mengele. He, too, had faced mothers holding babies — my mother holding my baby brother — and sentenced both to gruesome deaths. My moral upbringing would not allow me to become an honorary member of the SS.

Still, extending mercy felt weak. I tried to save face in front of the boys. If I couldn’t be a hardened killer, I could at least be a car thief. “Where is the car?” I yelled.

“There is nothing,” she said.

“Where is it?!” I barked.

“It’s not here,” she said.

I lowered the gun and stomped out of the house and went around back.

“You made us come here for nothing?” one of the boys huffed.

“I couldn’t shoot her,” I said. “She had a baby!”

“How many babies did they kill?” he quipped. He had a point.

We walked to the large barn behind the house and unlatched the heavy wooden doors. There, covered with hay, sat the big black Mercedes. “That lying Nazi bitch!” one of the boys yelled. I was livid. I’d spared her life and she lied to my face.

“Wait here,” I told the boys. I marched back in the house, gun drawn, and found her. “This time, I’m really going to shoot you,” I said. “Give me the keys!” She gave me the keys. I jogged back to the boys and the car. “I got them,” I said rattling the keys in my hand.

“Who knows how to drive?” one of the boys asked.

“Don’t worry, I do,” I said. We brushed off the hay and hopped in the car.

“Hurry up! Let’s get out of here,” one of the boys said.

What a sight we must have been: three teenage Jews in striped prisoner uniforms, armed with machine guns, driving a black Mercedes in Weimar, Germany, on our way back to the Buchenwald concentration camp. We smiled, laughed, and talked tough like the men we weren’t.

“Did you see how scared she was?” one boy said excitedly. “I bet she made in her underwear!” We chuckled and drove on.

“Look!” one of the boys said pointing out the window. “Two girls!” I pulled the car to the side of the street.

We invited the German girls to take a ride. They must have been so mesmerized by the Mercedes that our raggedy uniforms failed to give them pause. To my surprise, they hopped in. This was the closest any of us had been to attractive girls in a long, long time. They rode with us a few blocks before we dropped them off.

I contemplated ditching the car. After all, we were driving the mayor of Weimar’s Mercedes. If that didn’t give us away, the license plates would. But then I thought, What the hell? When’s the next time you will get to drive a Mercedes?

So I drove the car all the way back to Buchenwald. In fact, I drove straight through the camp gates. Only this time, the irony of the slogan emblazoned across the gates — “To each what he deserves!” — made me laugh.

Prisoners stood motionless and stared as we coasted into camp. They must have assumed an important dignitary or the mayor of Weimar himself would step out of the fancy car. When they saw our striped prisoner uniforms, they rushed us. “How did you get a Mercedes?” someone asked.

“Well,” I said smiling, “we just got it.”

Throughout my life I had heard that everything happens for a reason, that God’s ways were mysterious but purposeful. I believed that. But something I read decades after my showdown at the mayor of Weimar’s house proved to me that in the end, in this life or the one after, God ultimately achieves justice.

A friend shared with me an article from a 1945 issue of Life magazine about Nazi suicides following the war. Here is a portion of what it said: “In the last days of the war the overwhelming realization of utter defeat was too much for many Germans. Stripped of the bayonets and bombast which had given them power, they could not face a reckoning with either their conquerors or their consciences. These found the quickest and surest escape in what Germans call Selbstmord, self-murder . . . In Hitler’s Reich, Germans stopped killing others and began killing themselves. In Weimar, the mayor and his wife, after seeing Buchenwald atrocities, slashed their wrists.”

That day at the mayor’s home, God pricked my conscience. In so doing, He spared me the guilt and shame of killing the mayor of Weimar’s wife.

I didn’t need to kill her. She did it for me.

Excerpted with permission from “Measure of a Man: From Auschwitz Survivor to Presidents’ Tailor” (Regnery) by Martin Greenfield with Wynton Hall, out this week.

Khamenei YM"S: "The Only Cure for Israel is its Annihilation"

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei Y"MS, on Saturday once again called for Israel’s destruction.

Khamenei’s latest provocation came in a series of tweets in which he launched a tirade against the Jewish state and called to arm Palestinian Arabs in Judea and Samaria.

“This barbaric, wolflike & infanticidal regime of Israel which spares no crime has no cure but to be annihilated,” read one tweet.

“The only means to confront a barbaric regime like Israel is arming WestBank,” read another tweet by the Supreme Leader.

“We've seen 100s of times that Israel doesn't abide by #peace.They didn't even tolerate Arafat who cooperated w/them& poisoned him to death,” charged Khamenei in another post, referring to the death of former Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat.

"WestBank should be armed just like Gaza. Friends of Palestine should do their best to arm People in West Bank,” another tweet read.

This is certainly not the first time that Khamenei has called for Israel’s destruction. 

Last month, the Iranian leader accused Israel of having "no limit or boundaries regarding viciousness, cruelty, and trampling underfoot all human standards and ethnics. Crimes, genocide, mass destruction, the killing of children, women and the homeless...they take pride in."

He previously said on Twitter that the Israel government was “the most wicked terrorist” in the world.

Khamenei has also called Israel an "illegitimate and bastard regime," and further called the United States a "smiling enemy" that is not to be trusted.

The latest Twitter rant, ironically enough, comes just days after reports indicated that U.S. President Barack Obama had written a letter to Khamenei in which he indicated that cooperation on ISIS depends on an agreement being reached by the November 24 deadline regarding Iran's nuclear program.

The White House would not comment on the reports and would only reiterate that Washington’s policy toward Iran has not changed, but Obama’s national security advisor, Susan Rice, on Friday said that Washington was “not engaged with Iran” regarding ISIS.

American Jewish Leaders Quiet while Obama abandons Israel and serenades Iran and Qatar,

Where is Shumer, while Israel is bleeding? Where is the Agudath Israel? Where?
Read the following: 
By Isi Leibler

Isi Leibler

Is American Jewish leadership intimidated?‎ I would hesitate writing this column had I not served as a national Jewish leader who faced ‎similar dilemmas to those confronting the American Jewish leadership today, many of whom I ‎was engaged with in various battles against enemies of the Jewish people and Israel.‎ Yet, with considerable regret and notwithstanding notable exceptions, I believe that today the ‎major leaders within the American Jewish establishment are failing to stand up and be ‎counted, despite chilling signals that the U.S. administration is about to abandon ‎Israel, effectively revoking the U.S.-Israel alliance on which we are deeply dependent.  There ‎are even hints that U.S. President Barack Obama may forgo the U.S. veto at the United Nations ‎Security Council that protects Israel from censure and sanctions, which could have disastrous ‎repercussions. This is taking place at a time when much of the world regards Israel as it did ‎Czechoslovakia in the 1930s. ‎ Another serious issue is that Obama has again breached a solemn undertaking and appears ‎prepared to consummate a deal with the Iranians, enabling them to achieve nuclear status.‎ Tensions have escalated over the past 12 months and the vicious and humiliating manner in ‎which the Obama administration has treated Israel, its purported ally and the only democratic ‎state in the region, is unprecedented.  The administration's condemnation of Israel's ‎‎"disproportionate response" and directive to withhold replenishment of arms during the Gaza ‎war is hardly the behavior of a genuine ally.‎ In contrast, the Obama administration serenades Iran and Qatar, which promote global ‎terrorism; kowtows to Saudi Arabia despite its horrific abuse of human rights, and embraces ‎Turkey's anti-Semitic President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.‎ Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has failed to make a single concession, opting ‎to merge with the genocidal Hamas. He deliberately incites hatred of Israelis, and just last ‎week hailed the murderer of the 3-month-old Israeli baby as a shaheed (martyr) and extended ‎condolences to the family of Rabbi Yehuda Glick's attempted assassin, whom he described as ‎‎"rising to heaven while defending our people's rights and holy places."  Abbas adviser Sultan ‎Abu Al-Einen said that the "bullets were a beacon that will continue to shine for years to ‎come." Yet the Obama administration remains circumspect and respectful of Abbas while ‎Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is treated with contempt and derision.‎ What is especially galling is that in the midst of regional upheaval with millions of people being ‎displaced, hundreds of thousands butchered and the world confronted by a snowballing ‎threat of Islamic barbarism from Islamic State and other terrorist groups, Obama remains obsessed ‎with Israel's need to make concessions that would undermine its security and create long-term ‎existential threats. It is bizarre that he spends more time condemning Israel for building homes ‎in Jewish neighborhoods of Jerusalem than on the carnage taking place in the region.‎ And yet, despite all of the above, the Jewish leadership seems to have hibernated.  The only ‎voices consistently protesting against the bias and condemnations directed against Israel are ‎the Zionist Organization of America and the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Center, ‎which was the first to respond with a well-deserved fusillade against the "chickenshit" ‎outburst, demanding an apology and repudiation.‎ The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, in a rare criticism of ‎the White House, demanded that the anonymous official whose remarks were "inappropriate" ‎and "counterproductive" be "held to account." But Abe Foxman, the national director of the ‎Anti-Defamation League, effectively trivialized the incident, saying that "the White House ‎statement [which distanced itself from the comments without condemning them] should bring ‎closure to the issue." ‎ Amazingly, the National Jewish Democratic Council condemned the outburst in harsher terms ‎than the Jewish establishment, expressing "surprising disappointment at the profane and ‎inappropriate language" employed. ‎ The issues at stake here are far beyond the vulgar language and the hostile exchanges between ‎Obama and Netanyahu. They relate to the foundations of the U.S.-Israel alliance.‎ These are times when one would expect the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (whose ‎raison d'etre is surely to respond to such situations) and the American Jewish leadership to ‎publicly protest at the manner in which Israel is being treated. ‎ Remaining silent and relying on the ZOA and other small groups to defend Israel, conveys the ‎false impression that the committed American Jewish community is alienated from Israel and ‎prefers to remain aloof while the Obama administration bashes the Jewish state. ‎ Most Jewish leaders with whom I communicate admit that they consider Obama's behavior ‎toward Israel as reprehensible. ‎ Many seek to rationalize their behavior by stressing that they are lobbying vigorously behind ‎the scenes and maintain that public criticism of Obama would encourage him to become even ‎more extreme.‎ This is the classic Diaspora approach of the "trembling Israelites." It has been proved wrong in ‎the past and American Jewish leaders, to their credit, were always robust and outgoing in ‎exercising their democratic right to promote the Jewish standpoint. We have learned over the ‎years that while shtadlanut (silent diplomacy) is indeed necessary, it can only be effective ‎when backed up by a public campaign.‎ At this crucial turning point in the relationship with Israel, my real concern is that American ‎Jewish leaders are simply fearful of directly confronting the president and that the allegedly ‎powerful Jewish lobby lacks the backbone to stand up and be counted. ‎ The absence of direction and leadership has already resulted in further erosion as displayed by ‎Gary Rosenblatt, the respected editor of The New York Jewish Week, who produced an ‎editorial titled "Bibi takes on the world," blasting Netanyahu for confronting the "leader of the ‎free world" and "jeopardizing Israel's relationship with its most important allies" for electoral ‎reasons.  Rosenblatt is a Zionist and a courageous and outspoken journalist. Only two weeks ‎earlier, he had penned an editorial, "Blaming Israel isn't the answer," castigating the global ‎anti-Israeli tsunami. ‎ But his latest editorial was unfair and extremely damaging. The Jewish Week was founded by ‎the Jewish Federations, and Rosenblatt conceded to Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic (who ‎exposed the "chickenshit" comment) that in the past there would have been "hell to pay in the ‎community" for such an editorial on Israel, but now "that is no longer the case." ‎ Goldberg cited the editorial as evidence that Jewish leaders were "uneasy" about Israel's ‎direction. He referred to discussions by unnamed Jewish officials questioning Netanyahu's ‎policies. He went on to state that Israel should be trying to "negotiate in good faith" with the ‎duplicitous Abbas and impose a settlement freeze on Jerusalem and the settlement blocs until ‎such time as negotiations with the Palestinians have clarified which territory will remain within ‎Israel. Needless to say, pigs will fly before the Palestinians agree to such an accommodation.‎ This is the approach that the Obama administration will adopt in its forthcoming effort to ‎renew negotiations after the midterm elections. Whereas most Israelis feel that the prime ‎minister would be well advised to cease making public announcements about construction, the ‎vast consensus would never agree to a construction freeze in the settlement blocs and ‎especially not in the Jewish neighborhoods of Jerusalem.‎ Certain myths and falsehoods need to be dispelled. Israel is not creating new settlements. To ‎the contrary, the only real change on the ground in the last decade has been the dismantling of ‎settlements in Gaza which were transformed to launch rockets. Nor are any Arabs being ‎displaced or Palestinian land being appropriated. The entire area engaged in current ‎settlement is about 3 percent of the former Jordanian occupied territories. The Oslo accords never ‎required limits to settlement growth and certainly not natural growth of existing communities.‎ That is the message that AIPAC and Jewish leaders must urgently promote. They must also ‎firmly and publicly condemn the biased policies adopted against Israel by the administration ‎and lobby Congress to prevent Obama from abandoning Israel during his remaining two years ‎in office.‎ Failure by the Jewish leadership to act now will massively undermine the entire Jewish ‎community as a political force in America, sending a message to the American people and ‎Congress that American Jews are distancing themselves from Israel. This would invariably ‎impact on the very high levels of support that Israel currently enjoys.‎ It will also weaken the will of Jewish students to stand up and fight for themselves at the ‎campuses, many of which have been transformed into anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic cesspools.‎ The Jewish leadership has an enormous responsibility to provide direction. Hopefully they will ‎move in this direction, preventing analogies between today's American Jewish establishment ‎and the disastrous era of Rabbi Stephen Wise and his colleagues, who failed to stand up to ‎President Franklin Roosevelt's indifference to the plight of Jews during the Holocaust.‎ Isi Leibler's website can be viewed at www.wordfromjerusalem.com. He may be contacted at ‎ileibler@leibler.com.‎

WHAT LANDSLIDE? Obama threatens vetoes and executive orders – including immigration reform THIS YEAR

This guy is living under a rock somewhere on another planet!
Doesn't he understand that the reason Democrats lost in a lanslide is because America repudiated his crazy suicidal policies?

1. 'Congress will pass some bills I cannot sign,' the president warned
2. He has only vetoed  two minor bills since his inauguration in 2009
3. And 'I'll take some actions that some in Congress will not like,' Obama added, referring to threatened executive orders
4. Those include a bold move on immigration 'before the end of the year'
5. President sounded more like a winner than a loser despite his policies being repudiated on a national scale
6. Never articulated a single policy where he would shift his position to align with GOP majorities in both houses of Congress 

President Barack Obama came out swinging on Wednesday just 14 hours after a Republican wave swept over the U.S. Congress in an election that largely repudiated his policies.

'Congress will pass some bills I cannot sign,' he said, threatening to dust off a veto pen that he has used only twice in nearly six years.

And he hinted at executive orders that will enrage conservatives. 

'I'm pretty sure I'll take some actions that some in Congress will not like,' he said. 'That's natural. That's how Democracy works.'

Much of reporters' tussling with the president focused on executive orders related to immigration reform – what some tea party Republicans call an 'amnesty' – which he plans to implement this year.

He acknowledged that the GOP won Tuesday's elections, but framed the results as a mandate for Republicans to work with him, instead of the other way around.

'Obviously the Republicans had a good night,' he said. 

But he said he would principally work with them 'if there are ideas that the Republicans have that I am confident will make things better for ordinary Americans.'

'I want to just see what works,' he said.

'The American people sent a message,' he claimed, 'one that they've sent for several elections now.' 

'They expect the people they elect to work as hard as they do. They expect us to focus on their ambitions, and not ours.'

He then rattled off a list of economic indicators that he said buttressed his case that Republicans should accept his point of view.

'More Americans are working. Unemployment has come down,' he claimed, glossing over the part-time employment shift that the Obamacare law's employer mandate has ushered in. 

'Our economy is outpacing most of the world. But we've just gotta keep at it. Much of that will take action from Congress. And I'm eager to work with the next Congress.'

He cited infrastructure building projects and international trade as areas where he thought his agenda overlaps with the GOP's. 

Responding to hot-button questions about the fate of Obamacare in the age of a Republican Congress, the president didn't budge.

He said he would only work with Republicans if they seek to 'make responsible changes' to the law. 'I'm going to be very receptive to hearing those ideas.'

'Despite all the contention,' Obama claimed, 'we now know that the law works.'

And he pledged to avoid last year's chronic website snafus the next time around. 

'We're really making sure the website works super well before the next open enrollment period,' he said. 'We're double- and triple'checking it.'

Addressing his relationship with the new Senate majority leader, Obama chuckled at a question about whether he might sit down with him for a drink.

'I would enjoy having some Kentucky bourbon with Mitch McConnell,' the president said. 

'He has always been very straightforward with me. To his credit, he has never made a promise that he couldn't deliver. And he knows the legislative process well. He obviously know his caucus well.'

McConnell, he told reporters, has 'always given me realistic assessments of what he can get through his caucus and what he can't, so I think we can have a productive relationship.' 

Obama also announced that he has sent Congress a funding request for $6.18 billion in new funds to fight the Ebola crisis at home and in Africa.

And he surprised many by saying he would ask Congress for a new Authorization for Use of Military Force to help him prosecute a flagging war against the self-described Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), the terror army that has slaughtered indiscriminately in its quest for a regional caliphate.

The move is a 180-degree turn from he administration's previous position that a George W. Bush-era congressional permission slip was more than adequate to deal with turmoil in Iraq and Syria. 

'We now have a different type of enemy,' Obama said Wednesday, echoing Republicans' objections months ago. 'The strategy is different.'

''It makes sense for us to make sure that the authorization from Congress reflects what we perceive to be not just out strategy over the next two to three months,' he said, but also our strategy moving forward.

The president also challenged the lame-duck Congress, with a Senate still run by the election-wounded Nevada Democrat Harry Reid, to 'pass a budget for the rest of the fiscal year' in just five weeks, and to do it in a 'bipartisan, drama-free way.'

And he didn't budge on immigration, despite the second midterm election shellacking of his presidency.

'I have consistently said that it is my profound preference and interest to see Congress act on a comprehensive immigration reform bill,' Obama said.

That sort of bill passed the Senate in 2013 but was dead on arrival in the House.

With a larger Republican majority in the House and a newly minted Senate majority as well, that plan seems even less likely to succeed now.

Obama pledged to 'do everything I can in my executive authority' to take 'whatever lawful actions that I can take that I believe will improve our immigration system.'

And he dared the GOP to see things his way.

Executive orders, he said, 'will be replaced and supplanted by a bill from Congress.'

'You send me a bill that I can sign and those executive actions go away.

But he cautioned: 'What I'm not gonna do is just wait.'

America faces most dangerous two years in 150 years because of Defiant Obama

If President Obama suffered a “shellacking” in the 2010 elections, then what he endured Tuesday night was nothing short of a vicious gangland beatdown the likes of which have rarely been seen before in the history of electoral politics.

This, of course, is a wonderful and well-deserved outcome. But beware: America now enters the two most dangerous years of her existence — or certainly the most dangerous since the Great Depression and possibly going all the way back to the Civil War.

Not to dismiss the promising results of Tuesday’s election.

Voters clearly and forcefully rejected the party, politics and policies of President Obama. They slapped his socialist agenda back into the days of Soviet gulags, where it belongs.

His grand visions of mighty government ruling unchecked over desperate ghettos have been snuffed out.

Gone, too, were the so-called “low-information voters” who have been coaxed to the polls since 2008 on lies and false promises that the federal government would solve all their problems.

They are used up and wrung out.

Even the onslaught of threats and desperate accusations in endless emails to their Obamaphones couldn’t motivate those people to the polls one more time.

Voters rejected the craven, crass and mafioso tactics of Senate Leader Harry Reid.

Voters stripped him of his baldly partisan use of the United States Senate as a graveyard for all House legislation in order to protect his Democrats from tough votes and insulate the President from reality.

The little man with giant fists got staggered by a nasty uppercut from voters even though Reid saw it coming for weeks. Now, the ex-boxer stumbles on the canvas all tangled in the ropes, waiting for the bell.

And voters also rejected the loony-toon delusions of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi. Honestly, the woman should be running a hat and wig shop in Boro-Park, selling weed and prescription pills on the side. How it is that Democrats in Congress have taken her so seriously for so long will baffle historians for decades.

The silver lining for Democrats today is now they now have the perfect excuse to bounce both of them out of leadership forever.

Obama still has two more years left in his final term.Obama has demonstrated again and again that he has no regard for the constitution or the legitimacy of laws when they do not suit his agenda. He flaunts his disregard for the constitutional process, dismisses laws he doesn’t like and rewrites others.
He mocks the powers of Congress. The Supreme Court has slapped him down more than any president in recent times. All of this as he tells us he is an expert on constitutional law.

And this is where things get very, very dangerous for America.

Now come his very explicit threats to pass more illegal and unconstitutional presidential edicts to grant amnesty to illegal aliens already in the United States. This, in turn, will issue invitations for millions more illegals to come streaming across the border.

It will not end at immigration. Unchecked power is addictive.

Disowned by Democrats and made to feel irrelevant in this election, President Obama’s enormous and unjustified ego is deeply wounded. He is frustrated and feels caged, cornered. This is when people like him are most dangerous.

Buoyant Republicans will make an effort to engage him.

But President Obama is not a listener. He is not a negotiator. He is not a learner. He will just take what he wants. It is easier that way.

Franklin D. Roosevelt’s court-packing scheme during the Great Depression was nothing like the strains this president has put on Constitution. Indeed, not since the Civil War has America faced such a dire threat to her existence as a lawful, constitutional republic.

The difference in leadership between then and now could not be more striking.

To bind the union, Abraham Lincoln took an economic and political war and elevated it into something higher. He made it about emancipating slaves and won. And saved the Republic.

This president does the opposite. He got elected promising to elevate politics but instead finds unity and sows discord, often inciting racial divisions.

America’s only hope today is that President Obama finally turns to the bust of Lincoln he keeps in the Oval Office and listens.