The vote Nov 6 is a choice between those who believe in G-D and support Israel and those who support the Islamists head cutters!

The Democratic Party’s symbolic dismissal of God with the removal and forced return of His name to its platform by party officials amid boos from delegates could be the turning point in the 2012 presidential campaign said talk radio-host Michael Savage.

“This is a big moment,” Savage told his listeners after describing a remarkable divine encounter he experienced last night that has underscored for him the gravity of the moment.

“America is disgusted with this party of atheists and America haters,” he said.

At the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte today, the Associated Press noted Democratic officials were embarrassed by the reaction to the party’s removal from its platform yesterday of God’s name and of a declaration that Jerusalem is Israel’s capital.

When officials tried to reinsert the language today through amendments, Chairman Antonio Villaraigosa, the mayor of Los Angeles, had to call for a voice vote three times  because the outcome was unclear. The motion required an affirmation of two-thirds to pass, but it sounded like the yeas and nays were equal. When he ruled that the amendments had been approved by acclamation, he was met with a chorus of boos from delegates.

The scene at the DNC today was a sharp contrast to Savage’s experience last night at a Jewish wedding held at a cold, foggy and windy Presidio on San Francisco Bay.

The site of the wedding was next to the graves of thousands of war dead.

Savage said that as he stood behind the area where the ceremony took place, he noticed a small, bronze plaque in the ground that read: “In memory of all those who died on D-Day.”

“I looked up and I said to the rabbi, ‘Do you realize that if it wasn’t for these men who died on D-Day, none of us would be here today. We’d all be lampshades. We’d be dead.”

The rabbi then “grabbed my hands and we danced around the memorial stone.”

Soon five more men joined in, then 10.

“It was like something out of Chagall,” Savage said, referring to the Russian-French Jewish artist.

“Ten men dancing around this memorial to the fallen of World War II. The profundity was overwhelming to me,” Savage said.

Savage told his listeners of a dream he had that night that tied the wedding story to the events of today.

“I had a vision that the souls of the dead soldiers were drifting over the wedding canopy as this young Jewish couple was being married – that they were finally released from their graves,” he said.

“Many of them were released from their graves, and they knew what they had died for – so we could have religious freedom.”

Democratic National Conference Chairman Antonio Villaraigosa in Charlotte tonight

That “brings us to today” and the events at the Democratic National Convention, Savage said.

“Can you imagine, a nation founded on the principles of God is being taken over by a party that despises God, denies God’s existence and wants to stab Israel in the back in order to support the Islamists who would kill the Jews and drive them out of the Middle East?” Savage asked.

The vote Nov. 6, he said, is a choice between those who believe in God and support Israel, “despite their many blemishes,” and those who support “the Islamist head cutters.”

“It’s that simple,” he said. “It’s as clear as a bell to me.”

Tipping point

Savage said he knew “God’s hand was involved” in the wedding last night and in his own presence there, after initially deciding he didn’t want to go.

He told of meeting Jews from the former Soviet Union “who lived through the denial of God” and “through what Obama is trying to bring to America.”

“They lived through the ex-Soviet Union’s terrors,” Savage said. “They lived through the nationalization of private property, where their grandfathers were thrown out of their own houses, and the houses were given to the state to put the equivalent of the welfare recipients in their homes. They lived through persecution, where Bibles were burned and Jewish rituals were denied.”

Savage said the Jews who lived under communism told him that in the worst of times they never hated God or cursed him.

“One of them said to me, ‘You have one of the most unique roles on the planet.”

Savage said he didn’t know the man, a mystic-oriented rabbi.

“He looked me right in the eyes, and he held my hand and said, ‘You, Michael Savage, have one of the most unique and important roles in America today.”

The rabbi told him “the world is in balance, and your job is very important.”

Savage replied: “Well, what is my job?”

“Your job is to be the bridge between God and man,” the rabbi said.

“I can’t believe that,” Savage said.

“Well, you’d better believe it, because that’s what you’ve been doing on the radio,” the rabbi said. “Do you think it happened for nothing?

DemocRATS accept everyone .....except for.....

The Daily Show
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

Christians want Jews Slaughtered : Florida DemocRat County Chairman

New York Times doesn't want Romney as President because he eats only the tops of the muffin!

In its bid to terminate the presidential aspirations of Mitt Romney, The New York Times has gone mental. In a loopy op-ed piece last weekend, the Times squandered precious real estate on Columbia writing prof Marie Myung-Ok Lee. Her argument: Mitt’s rumored habit of eating only the tops of muffins makes him unfit to lead.

A Mitt biographer once wrote that the former Massachusetts gov eschews muffin bottoms because he presumes butter trickles down. This may not constitute sound baking theory. But Lee snobbishly assumes that her late Korean-immigrant father, a Republican whom she slams for having consumed garbage during the Korean War and cat food in times of plenty, would be mortified by the waste.

The piece is second in weirdness to Times writer Cathy Horyn’s take-down of vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan’s baggy suits. Ryan, she wrote, is “a nerd suddenly out of his loafers and into the sex dreams of Republicans.’’

Of course, rail-thin Ryan likely doesn’t touch baked goods. The Times has to cook up something, I guess.

Advocates For Jewish Abuse Victims Engage In War Of Words With DA Hynes

Mark Mayel Appel with DA Hynes met with a contingent activists on June 9 2012

Advocates working on behalf of Jewish victims of sexual abuse have cancelled a meeting with Brooklyn District Attorney Charles Hynes, saying they have grown weary of waiting for him to institute reforms and name alleged perpetrators in the Jewish community, according to a report in the New York Daily News (http://nydn.us/RMonJP).

Hynes last met with a contingent of concerned activists on June 9, and had promised to continue dialoguing with them.
Mark Mayel Appel, who founded the child advocacy group, Voice of Justice, said Hynes continues to play “the same game” and “appease the rabbis in Brooklyn.” He added that “there’s no point in going” to meet with Hynes since he has not moved to prosecute rabbis or other Jewish community leaders who harass victims while continuing to protect molesters.
But Hynes spokesman Jerry Schmetterer denied that the meeting had been cancelled, saying the meeting was only temporarily put off owing to scheduling difficulties. “It’s an ongoing process,” he said. “We are all happy on this end to continue.”

Michelle's Masterfully Delivered Speech Weaved Total Myth of Personal Struggle

It could not have been better in terms of performance.  But it was all lies.  She didn't believe any of it...  Time now to make up another version of Barack Obama. Create a new Barack Obama V 2.0 for you to vote for this year.  He cares and he's a saint.  That's right.  Fact-checkers are not going to be checking much of this, which is why I am.

First Lady Michelle Obama’s pitch to voters last night relied on the premise that she and her husband understand what it is to struggle to make ends meet. She spoke movingly about their early years--about how a young Barack Obama drove a car that was “rusted out" and found his furniture “in a dumpster,” how they both came from families that had to “scrape by.” Her fairy tale--however well-delivered--was one great, big, colorful lie.

Both Michelle Robinson and Barack Obama began their adult lives with a leg up on the rest of America. They attended elite schools: Michelle went to Whitney Young, the public magnet school for Chicago’s upper class, while Barack attended Punahou, the private prep school for the top stratum of Hawaiian society. They were accepted to Ivy League schools despite undistinguished credentials, and both attended Harvard Law School.

“[B]elieve it or not, when we were first married, our combined monthly student loan bills were actually higher than our mortgage,” Michelle said. That sounds like a raw deal--but in fact reflects their fortunate circumstances. They had both just graduated from a very expensive law school, and their combined income from cushy law firm jobs dwarfed the repayments. Barack also soon enjoyed a second salary from the University of Chicago.

They had expensive tastes, reflected in the $277,500 two-bedroom condo they bought in 1993--a high price even by today’s standards. Several years later, they moved into their $1.65 million mansion in Hyde Park--with the help of fraudster Tony Rezko. Barack often told a story of hardship on the campaign trail in 2008 about having his credit card declined--once. The fact that he thought this counted as real hardship speaks volumes.

As her husband moved onto the national political stage, Michelle Obama began to enjoy a lavish lifestyle at taxpayer expense, directly and indirectly. When Barack Obama was elected to the U.S. Senate, he obtained a $1 million earmark for the University of Chicago Hospital--and his wife’s salary as Vice President for Community Affairs jumped from $121,910 to $316,962. Her job: pushing poor, uninsured patients to other hospitals.

As First Lady, Michelle Obama has lived high on the hog while the rest of the country has suffered through an extraordinary recession. In 2010, she and her entourage decamped to Spain for a lavish vacation. That summer, the Obamas encouraged Americans to visit the Gulf coast after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which threatened tourism in the region. They promptly jetted off to Maine for their own summer holiday.

This summer, the Obamas skipped their usual summer trip to the wealthy playground of Martha’s Vineyard--months after Michelle and her daughters had enjoyed an expensive winter skiing trip in Aspen. And, of course, there are the frequent pilgrimages to Hawaii,  Some of their family’s comfort, of course, comes from private income, principally Barack Obama’s book sales--yet even that wealth is a spin-off of Obama’s political career.

If, as the Democrats eagerly pointing out, Mitt Romney enjoyed the privilege of private wealth, the Obamas have enjoyed privilege funded by public money and public life. And until entering the national spotlight, they gave little to charity, contributing instead to a church that preached racial grievance. “[T]ruth matters,” Michelle Obama told the nation last night. That, too, is a lie--because so far, she has evaded it without consequence.

DemocRATS wear racist buttons

G-Dless Democrats force G-D back into Platform, Democrats Boo, hiss and jeer decision

Embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats amended their convention platform Wednesday to add a mention of God and declare that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.
The chairman called for a vote three times before God was returned to the platform .

Many in the audience booed after the convention chairman, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, ruled that the amendments had been approved despite the fact that a large group of delegates had objected. He called for a vote three times before ruling.

The party reinstated language from the 2008 platform that said "we need a government that stands up for the hopes, values and interests of working people and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential."

It also reinstated its 2008 language that Jerusalem "is and will remain the capital of Israel. The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths."

Democrats had approved a platform on Tuesday that made no mention of God or Jerusalem. Instead, it expressed "unshakable commitment to Israel's security."

Republicans pounced quickly on both omissions.

GOP officials argued that not taking a position on Jerusalem's status in the party platform showed the president was weak in his support of Israel. Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney said omitting God "suggests a party that is increasingly out of touch with the mainstream of the American people."

"I think this party is veering further and further away into an extreme wing that American's don't recognize," Romney said.

The Democratic Party's decision to restore the mention of Jerusalem reflected what advisers said was the president's personal view, if not the policy of his administration. The administration has long said determining Jerusalem's status was an issue that should be decided by Israelis and Palestinians in peace talks, but has been careful not to state that Jerusalem is Israel's capital.

Romney's campaign quickly sought to capitalize on the slight, but important difference.

"Mitt Romney has consistently stated his belief that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel," said Andrea Saul, Romney's spokeswoman. "President Obama has repeatedly refused to say the same himself. Now is the time for President Obama to state in unequivocal terms whether or not he believes Jerusalem is Israel's capital."

The White House wouldn't say whether the change in the Democratic platform language reflected a change in administration policy.

Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said the reinstated party language reflected "the policy of both Republican and Democratic administrations for decades."

Following the decision, former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland told reporters, "It was an effort to bring clarification."

But the decision to amend the platform did not rest well with some delegates.

Noor Ul-Hasan, a Muslim delegate from Salt Lake City, Utah, said she felt it went against the principle of the separation of church and state.

"There are people who don't believe in God and you have to respect that as well," Ul-Hasan said. She also questioned whether the convention had enough of a quorum to even amend the platform. "There was no discussion. We didn't even see it coming. We were blindsided by it."

Angela Urrea, a delegate from Roy, Utah, said she felt it was sprung on the convention without any discussion.

"The majority spoke last night," Urrae said, noting the platform was approved Tuesday. "We shouldn't be declaring Jerusalem as the capital of Israel."

Republicans declared Jerusalem the capital of Israel in the platform the party approved last week at its convention in Tampa, Fla.

“G-d” and “Jerusalem” have been removed from Democratic platform

This is the paragraph that was in the 2008 platform:

“We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values, and interests of working people, and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their G-d-given potential.”

Now the words “G-d-given” have been removed. The paragraph has been restructured to say this:

“We gather to reclaim the basic bargain that built the largest middle class and the most prosperous nation on Earth – the simple principle that in America, hard work should pay off, responsibility should be rewarded, and each one of us should be able to go as far as our talent and drive take us.”

In the 2008 Democratic party platform, there was this language on Jerusalem, Israel:

“Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel. The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths.”

This year, however, that language has been removed. Indeed, there is no mention of Jerusalem in the 2012 party platform adopted by Democrats. In this year’s Democratic platform, there is this boilerplate language about Israel:

“President Obama and the Democratic Party maintain an unshakable commitment to Israel’s security. A strong and secure Israel is vital to the United States not simply because we share strategic interests, but also because we share common values. For this reason, despite budgetary constraints, the President has worked with Congress to increase security assistance to Israel every single year since taking office, providing nearly $10 billion in the past three years. The administration has also worked to ensure Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region. And we have deepened defense cooperation – including funding the Iron Dome system – to help Israel address its most pressing threats, including the growing danger posed by rockets and missiles emanating from the Gaza Strip, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. The President’s consistent support for Israel’s right to defend itself and his steadfast opposition to any attempt to delegitimize Israel on the world stage are further evidence of our enduring commitment to Israel’s security.”

100 Children in Lakewood still have no school!

Is there no shame? We wonder why children are at risk, why they go off the derech.
Read the following letter and weep!

Over 100 Boys still Without School
If R' Malkiel Kotler had the power to make sure no school accepted my children, why can't he make sure that all the schools accept the boys from Nesivos Ohr?

The phone call tonight from Rav Shmuel [Kamenetsky] was heart rending.  Nechamas Yisroel wants you to help rescue a Jewish child from being lost to public school. The message tells us what an important mitzva it is to give a child a Jewish education, especially before YOM HADIN [Yom Kippur]. The irony that  this message was being played on the phones of homes in Lakewood did not escape many.

Each year in Lakewood a game is played with parents and children as many  are accepted to schools of their choice, some go to schools that they felt were not in the best interest of their children, and others are left to beg as their children watch others start school. These children can suffer permanent damage as feelings of inadequacy and shame can remain in their psyche for the rest of their school year, and onward.

This year along with the usual- not Tznius enough, not Heimish enough, not enough money, parents are difficult, child is difficult, divorced from my second cousin, not the right hat, not the right Shul, not the right neighborhood, the neighbor told us bad things, husband goes biking in shorts etc.- This year there is an extra difficulty. There are over 100 boys still not in school because Nesivos Ohr boys school closed down. Every week parents are promised new solutions, and although some have been placed in schools, many children are still without a school. The parent body has finally decided to go to the Rosh Hayeshiva of Beth Medrash Govoha hoping that he could pressure the schools to accept all the children. R'  Malkiel's  initial reaction was that he thought they were all accepted already.  When the parents explained that nothing was further from the truth, he promised he will try his best and speak to the boys schools to find a solution.

At a recent meeting attended by Roshei Hayeshiva to discuss an individual that the Yeshiva wanted to silence once and for all, an argument ensued between a certain Rabbi and R' Malkiel Kotler. During the argument R' Malkiel became angry and exclaimed "We have the power in this town,  I made sure no school accepted Hershel Herskowitz's children."

Now it is the month of Elul. A time that Rav Shmuel Kaminetzky Shlita has said is a time to worry about the souls of jewish children going to public schools. Here in Lakewood we take the souls of our Jewish children for granted. We use them as pawns. We ignore their existence and focus on the parents. And in the case of the person that is at the helm of everything, we even use them to blackmail someone that we imagine to be a threat to our position of power.

Members of the  Vaad, the Township Committee,  along with Aaron and Malkiel Kotler spent so many hours last year working with principals of schools on how they would  use my children to force me to do their will. The letter I was finally given to sign in order to get my girls into a local school was a revelation of all of their collective fears. 1. No Politics 2. No article writing 3. Never oppose any building projects, and of course 4. Never do anything for the Klal without permission of the Roshei Hayeshiva. I guess someone wanted to have the monopoly on doing good for the town.

So I concede. Since you have all the power, and you don't want me to do any good for anyone, I will give you carte blanche to do all the good you can by yourself.

There are over 100 boys watching their neighbors board buses every morning to go to Cheder. If there ever was a time to show how powerful you really are,  now would be the time.

Hatzlacha, and a gut gebentched yur.

Vos Iz Neis is pro Obama

The Chassidishe News blog VIN or Vosizneis.com is pro Obama despite the fact that Obama is anti -Israel. The news blog caters to Satmar and Satmar is anti-israel. In this respect the Satmar have identical views with Reform and Conservative Liberal Jews.
Read some of the recent VIN bylines, notice they are all slanted in favor of our Muslim President and all are against Romney!
I would like to know what possesses a Jew to favor a Jew Hater like Obama? 

1)

Biden: Romney Wants War With Syria, Iran

The above was an article by the pro Obama Associated Press, this article portrays Romney as a war monger! 

2)

Republicans Tries to Portray Biden as Governing Liability

The above article reported again by the pro Obama Associated Press denigrates the Republicans and Ryan

3)

U.S. Makes Massive Reduction To Joint Military Exercise With Israel

The above article was actually in the Jerusalem Post , but the gist of the article was that OBAMA was the one who ordered the reduction.... but VIN wants you to believe that it was the United States, as if the United States is someone else.

4)

Republicans Paints A Nation On Brink, Dems See Rebound

The above article written by the pro Obama Associated Press makes the Democrats look optimistic while the republicans pessimistic...... The truth is that the Nation is on the brink and if we elect that Muslim, the USA will go down the tubes, but VIN doesn't care as long as there will be programs.

Every single political article in VIN slants the news in favor of that Jew hater Obama!

"I have this theory about Barack Obama. I think he's led a kind of make-believe life in which money was provided and doors were opened because at some point early on somebody or some group (George Soros anybody?) took a look at this tall, good looking, half-white, half-black, young man with an exotic African/Muslim name and concluded he could be guided toward a life in politics where his facile speaking skills could even put him in the White House.


 In a very real way, he has been a young man in a very big hurry. Who else do you know has written two memoirs before the age of 45? "Dreams of My Father" was published in 1995 when he was only 34 years old. The "Audacity of Hope" followed in 2006. If, indeed, he did write them himself. There are some who think that his mentor and friend, Bill Ayers, a man who calls himself a "communist with a small 'c'" was the real author.
 His political skills consisted of rarely voting on anything that might be deemed controversial. He went from a legislator in the Illinois legislature to the Senator from that state because he had the good fortune of having Mayor Daley's formidable  political machine at his disposal. He was in the U.S. Senate so briefly that his bid for the presidency was either an act of astonishing self-confidence or part of some greater game plan that had been determined before he first stepped foot in the Capital.
 How, many must wonder, was he selected to be a 2004 keynote speaker at the Democrat convention that nominated John Kerry when virtually no one had ever even heard of him before?  He outmaneuvered Hillary Clinton in primaries. He took Iowa by storm. A charming young man, an anomaly in the state with a very small black population, he oozed "cool" in a place where agriculture was the antithesis of cool. He dazzled the locals. And he had an army of volunteers drawn to a charisma that hid any real substance.

 And then he had the great good fortune of having the Republicans select one of the most inept candidates for the presidency since Bob Dole. And then John McCain did something crazy. He picked Sarah Palin, an unknown female governor from the very distant state of Alaska. It was a ticket that was reminiscent of 1984's Walter Mondale and Geraldine Ferraro and they went down to defeat.
   The mainstream political media fell in love with him. It was a schoolgirl crush with febrile commentators like Chris Mathews swooning then and now over the man. The venom directed against McCain and, in particular, Palin, was extraordinary.  

Now, 3 full years into his presidency, all of those gilded years leading up to the White House have left him unprepared to be President. Left to his own instincts, he has a talent for saying the wrong thing at the wrong time. It swiftly became a joke that he could not deliver even the briefest of statements without the ever-present Tele-Prompters.  Far worse, however, is his capacity to want to "wish away" some terrible realities, not the least of which is the Islamist intention to destroy America and enslave the West. Any student of history knows how swiftly Islam initially spread. It knocked on the doors of Europe, having gained a foothold in Spain.

 The great crowds that greeted him at home or on his campaign "world tour" were no substitute for having even the slightest grasp of history and the reality of a world filled with really bad people with really bad intentions. Oddly and perhaps even inevitably, his political experience, a cakewalk, has positioned him to destroy the Democrat Party's hold on power in Congress because in the end it was never about the Party. It was always about his communist ideology, learned at an early age from family, mentors, college professors, and extreme leftist friends and colleagues.
  Obama is a man who could deliver a snap judgment  about a Boston police officer who arrested an "obstreperous" Harvard professor-friend, but would warn Americans against "jumping to conclusions" about a mass murderer at Fort Hood who shouted "Allahu Akbar." The absurdity of that was lost on no one. He has since compounded this by calling the Christmas bomber "an isolated extremist" only to have to admit a day or two later that he was part of an al Qaeda plot.
 He is a man who could strive to close down our detention facility at Guantanamo even though those released were known to have returned to the battlefield against America. He could even instruct his Attorney General to afford the perpetrator of 9/11 a civil trial when no one else would ever even consider such an obscenity. An he is a man who could wait three days before having anything to say about the perpetrator of yet another terrorist attack on Americans and then have to elaborate on his remarks the following day because his  first statement was so lame.
  The pattern repeats itself. He either blames any problem on the Bush administration or he naively seeks to wish away the truth. 
 Knock, knock. Anyone home? Anyone there? Barack Obama exists only as the sock puppet of his handlers, of the people who have maneuvered and manufactured this pathetic individual's life. 
 When anyone else would quickly and easily produce a birth certificate, this man spent over a million dollars to deny access to his. Most other documents, the paper trail we all leave in our wake, have been sequestered from review. He has lived a make-believe life whose true facts remain hidden. 
We laugh at the ventriloquist's dummy, but what do you do when the dummy is President of the United States. 
  What will you do? 

Expensive organic food isn't healthier and no safer than produce grown with pesticides, finds biggest study of its kind

Stanford University team find no evidence of added health benefits

Also found customers aren't always getting pesticide free produce when they buy organic

It comes at a premium price, but it seems organic food may not be worth shelling out for.

Researchers claim it is no more nutritious than food grown using pesticides and chemicals – and won’t benefit your health.

Many people pay as much as a third more for organic food in the belief that it is healthier and safer. However, Dr Dena Bravata and colleagues from Stanford University Medical Centre, California, found no clear evidence of any significant added health benefits.

They also found that there was no guarantee organic food would be pesticide-free – a key attraction for many consumers – though it did have lower levels.

Senior author Dr Bravata said: ‘There isn’t much difference between organic and conventional foods, if you’re an adult and making a decision based solely on your health.’

The results, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine journal, come from the biggest review yet of existing studies comparing the two types of food.  However, UK campaigners said the survey was not equipped to detect real differences.

Researchers sifted through thousands of papers looking into the health benefits of organic food.

The review included studies of people with organic and conventional diets, as well as research into nutrient levels, bacterial, fungal or pesticide contamination.

Researchers found no consistent differences in the vitamin content of various foods. They also found no difference in protein or fat content between organic and conventional milk.

They were also unable to identify specific fruits and vegetables for which organic appeared consistently to be the healthier choice.

Co-researcher Crystal Smith- Spangler, who is also an instructor of medicine at Stanford’s School of Medicine, said: ‘Some believe that organic food is always healthier and more nutritious. We were a little surprised that we didn’t find that.’

The researchers did find organic produce was 30 per cent less likely to be contaminated with pesticides than conventional fruit and vegetables, but not guaranteed to be pesticide-free, while pesticide levels of all foods came within the allowable safety limits.

Two studies of children found lower levels of pesticide residues in the urine of those on organic diets, though for all those studied the levels were below allowable safety thresholds.

A spokesman for the Soil Association said: ‘This US study, of limited application in Europe, found organic food helps people avoid pesticides in their food.

‘However, the scientific methodology used for the review, while suitable for comparing trials of medicines, is not right for comparing different crops.’

Organic farming may not be better for the environment, according to Oxford University scientists.

They found organic milk, cereals, and pork all generated higher greenhouse gas emissions than their conventionally farmed counterparts. Organic beef and olives produced lower emissions.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2197854/Organic-better-produce-grown-pesticides-say-Stanford-University-scientists.html#ixzz25SQ9xM7S

Yeshiva student shot in Boro-Park

A serious incident of anti-Semitism took place in Borough Park, Brooklyn, New York, last week, when a young yeshiva student was shot and seriously wounded, according to reports in the Israeli news media.

The incident occurred when the boy was standing at the door of the yeshiva, in the early afternoon.

According to eyewitnesses, the shooting came from a building located in front of the yeshiva building, where some non-Jewish families also live.

Police collected evidence from passers-by, and started building their case. After a thorough search conducted in the apartments near the Jewish school building, a man was arrested after a gun was found in his home.

Investigators claimed that the man did not intentionally shoot the Jewish student, as he accidentally fired the weapon. However witnesses said the man pointed the gun at the young student.

Emergency rescue volunteers took the student, who was severely injured, to Maimonides Hospital of Brooklyn located nearby.

Rebbi charged with manslaughter after leaving toddler in hot car

A teacher was arrested last week and charged with manslaughter after leaving a toddler in a hot car until he died.

The Jerusalem Magistrate's Court has decided not to extend the remand of a resident of Modiin Illit, suspected of leaving the 4-year-old Chiam Boimel in a car for hours, leading to the boy's death.

Police pleaded with the judge to extend the remand of Nachman Stitzer for five more days on Friday, but the court chose to put him under house arrest. Stitzer, 22, who works as a teacher, is suspected of negligent manslaughter.
The suspect broke down at the hearing.

During the custody hearing the prosecution also charged Stitzer of running an illegal school bus service, when the victim was left in his car.
The prosecution said that "In order to improve his livelihood, the suspect provided transportation to and from school on his way to work. The entire incident was due to negligence.
This is a private car which five or more children between the ages of three to four were transported. Some had seat belts on, others did not."

The suspect said he left the scene assuming that the child was no longer in the car, locked the car with a remote control and kept going.

 The suspect also said he usually goes to his car all day to get cigarettes, unfortunately, this did not happen on the day of the incident, since he had his cigarettes on his person so he did not return to the car all day."

The prosecution said the suspect was cooperating with the investigation and had pleaded guilty to the charges. It was also noted that the suspect "broke down" several times during the investigation.