“I don’t speak because I have the power to speak; I speak because I don’t have the power to remain silent.” Rav Kook z"l

Thursday, August 6, 2015

Agudath Israel Leaders Meet With Senator Gillibrand On Iran Nuclear Deal


As the U.S. Senate entered the final days of its session before breaking for summer recess, a high ranking delegation of Agudath Israel of America leaders traveled to Washington earlier this week to meet with Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D, NY) to discuss the organization’s deep concerns about the Iranian nuclear deal, and to urge her to vote against the deal.

In a meeting that lasted over half-an-hour, the Agudath Israel delegation delivered a clear message: the proposed deal with Iran is fraught with grave danger for America and its allies, especially Israel, and should be disapproved.

Senator Gillibrand, who was clearly knowledgeable about the many complex issues surrounding the proposed agreement yet deeply interested in the insights her guests brought to the table, took careful notes as the Agudath Israel leaders made their case. While she did not definitively indicate which way she planned to vote, the Senator spoke with great passion about the terrible threat a nuclear empowered Iran would pose, and she forcefully articulated America’s responsibility to prevent that threat from materializing.

After the meeting, Agudath Israel executive vice president Rabbi Chaim Dovid Zwiebel described Senator Gillibrand as “diligent and intelligent, sensitive to the concerns we raised and clear-eyed about the nature of the Iranian threat.  It was a privilege for us to have an opportunity to engage the Senator in intense face-to-face dialogue on this vital issue.”

The other members of the Agudath Israel delegation included three members of the organization’s board of trustees, Charles (Hashi) Herzka, Ralph (Shmuel Yosef) Rieder and Jacob (Yaty) Weinreb, as well as Agudath Israel’s executive vice president for finance and administration Rabbi Shlomo Gertzulin, and vice president for federal affairs Rabbi Abba Cohen.

The meeting with Senator Gillibrand was one of a series of targeted meetings Agudath Israel plans to have in the weeks ahead with Senators and Representatives who have not yet indicated how they intend to vote on the Iranian deal.  “We hope,” Rabbi Zwiebel said, “that the relationship many of our key constituents across America enjoy with their elected officials, and the perspectives we have to offer, will prove useful in persuading those officials to vote no on this dangerous deal.”




The President would be well advised to stop attacking his critics and to start answering their hard questions with specific and credible answers.


by Allen Dershowitz
Hussain Obama's desperation to save his Iran deal, has taken to attacking its opponents in personal ways.  He has accused critics of his deal of being the same republican war mongers who drove us into the ground war against Iraq and has warned that they would offer “overheated” and often dishonest arguments.  He has complained about the influence of lobbyists and money on the process of deciding this important issue, as if lobbying and money were not involved in other important matters before Congress. 

These types of ad hominem arguments are becoming less and less convincing as more democratic members of Congress, more liberal supporters of the President, more nuclear experts and more foreign policy gurus are expressing deep concern, and sometimes strong opposition to the deal that is currently before Congress.

I, myself, am a liberal Democrat who twice voted for President Obama and who was opposed to the invasion and occupation of Iraq.  Part of the reason I was opposed was because I considered, and still consider, Iran a much greater threat to the security of the world and to the stability of the Middle East than Iraq ever was.  In my newly published e-book The Case Against the Iran Deal: How Can We Now Stop Iran From Getting Nukes?, I make arguments that I believe are honest, fair and compelling.  I recognize some advantages in the deal, but strongly believe that the disadvantages considerably outweigh them and that the risks of failure are considerable.  My assessment is shared by a considerable number of other academics, policy experts and other liberal Democrats who support President Obama’s domestic policies, who admire Secretary Kerry for his determination, and who do not see evil intentions in the deal.

The President would be well advised to stop attacking his critics and to start answering their hard questions with specific and credible answers.  Questions that need answering include the following: 

 1.      Even after the expiration of the nuclear agreement, will American policy remain that Iran will never under any circumstances be allowed to develop nuclear weapons?  Or is it now our policy that Iran will be free to do whatever it wants to do once the deal expires?

2.      After the major constraints contained in the deal end, or were the deal to collapse at any point, how long would it take Iran to produce a deliverable nuclear bomb?

3.      Would the United States allow Iran to begin production of a nuclear arsenal when the major constraints of the deal end?

4.      Does the deal reflect a reversal in policy from President Obama’s pre-reelection promise that “My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon”?

5.      If not, will President Obama now announce that it is still the policy of the United States that Iran will not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon?

6.      How exactly will the inspections regime work? Precisely how much time will the Iranians have between a request for inspection and the inspection itself? What precisely will they be permitted to do during this hiatus? And why do they need so much time if they don’t plan to cheat?

7.      What will President Obama do if Iran is caught cheating on this deal during his administration?

8.      Precisely when will which sanctions be lifted under the agreement? Do provisions that prevent the P5 plus one from imposing new sanctions apply even if Iran is found to be in violation of its commitments under the agreement? When exactly will sanctions prohibiting the sale of weapons, and particularly missile technology, be lifted?

If and when these and other important questions about the deal are answered—directly, candidly, and unambiguously—Congress will be in a better position to answer the fundamental questions now before it: would rejecting this deeply flawed deal produce more dangerous results than not rejecting it? If so, what can we now do to assure that Iran will not acquire a nuclear arsenal? The answers to those questions may profoundly affect the future of the world.

So the President should spend more time on substance and less on personal attacks. 


Alan Dershowitz is an emeritus professor of law at Harvard Law School. His new e-book, The Case Against the Iran Deal: How Can We Now Stop Iran From Getting Nukes?, is now available.

Wednesday, August 5, 2015

Kerry to Congress: Don’t ‘Screw’ Ayatollah


Instead of sitting down the Iranians and telling them, bluntly, it looks like Congress is not going for the deal, so we will have reinstate the sanctions, freeze every single penny thatyou  have in any bank in the world ..... until we Americans can go in anytime to inspect, .....this moron Kerry, is terrified that if Congress rejects the deal the "ayatollah will never come back." Crazy incompetent ketchup meshugener!

In an interview with The Atlantic on Wednesday, Secretary of State John Kerry warned Congress in personal terms not to reject the U.S. nuclear deal with Iran.
“The ayatollah constantly believed that we are untrustworthy, that you can’t negotiate with us, that we will screw them,” Kerry said of the country’s supreme leader, adding that rejection would be “the ultimate screwing.”
Congress has several weeks left to review and potentially reject the deal. Kerry said if that happens, the ayatollah will never come back to the negotiating table with the U.S. Read more at The Atlantic.

Stop The Obsession With Our Religion [Responding To A NY Post Column By Maureen Callahan]


by Barry Spitzer a proud Chusid from Boro Park.

I had just finished a phone call with the father of Faigy Mayer, may her soul rest in peace, when I saw a pained look mixed with disbelief on my wife’s face. I asked her what was wrong; she replied that she just read a New York Post column and could not believe the lies and accusations leveled against Chasidic Jews based solely on comments from individuals who have left our community and clearly have an agenda to advance. 

Sadly, we have all become accustomed to lie-filled writings when it comes to Chasidim, but having just spoken to Faigy’s father and hearing the anguish in his voice, even while he told me that what was being written about him and his family did not bother him, I decided to take a look.

To be frank, what I read is a new low. The column relies on innuendo and lies masquerading as truth, without the slightest modicum of journalistic integrity. Of course, columnists write their opinion, not news, but we do have the right to expect at least some truth in their writings.

There are forty thousand suicides in the United States each year and yet this tragic case is the one chosen for dissection and interpretation. To sensationalize the tragic death of a young woman to further an intolerance and hatred of Chasidic Jews while blatantly disregarding the feelings of the family and the entire community who have just lived through a heartbreaking calamity is, quite frankly, despicable.

Rather than giving credence to the numerous lies and half-truths that fill the paragraphs of this, and other writings, I choose instead to educate you about what Chasidic Judaism is all about.

 Chasidic Judaism is about goodness, kindness and charitable work unparalleled in this city, and I venture to say, entire country. We educate thousands upon thousands of children around the world each year and almost all go on to become productive members of society. Our charitable organizations help the sick and needy without regard to level of observance. We are a caring, compassionate community.

The regular mocking of our traditions can only be responded to in one way: the way we live works. Our community is not known for teenage promiscuity, out-of-wedlock births, sexual assault and unfaithful marriages. The modesty standards by which we live help us avoid these issues. Our families are proud to dress according to Chassidic traditions. How would you rather have our community’s women dress? Piercings in all areas of the body, low cut jeans with their midriff showing or miniskirts barely wider than a belt? I say: no thanks.

As far as “insulation” goes; our children do not spend hours upon hours surfing the internet, filling their minds with all the trash out there. Nor do they spend their time playing violent video games or watching television shows & movies that glorify violence, sex and drugs. 

When was the last time a band of Chassidic youth were accused of assaulting someone? Or trashing a place of business? Or shoplifting? Or turnstile-jumping? Or drinking in public? There’s a reason we don’t feel the need to have our children go through metal detectors in our community’s schools.
It goes without saying that keeping these bad influences from our lives has a positive impact on our children’s future. It is something to be celebrated, not maligned and mocked. Going after our way of life is a product of hate and jealousy.

The Chasidic way of life is a vehicle to live in a spiritually uplifting manner, with a higher purpose that has been practiced for millennia. Very few feel the need to leave our community; those who do are the exception, not the rule. We are not bursting at the seams with people wanting to leave Chasidic Judaism because people are living happy and fulfilling lives and have no desire to abandon that.

A recurring theme in these stories is how these so-called “OTDs” feel ostracized by their families and communities. It is worthy to point out that they made a choice to leave. It is fair to ask what precisely they expected of the community they abandoned.

In households around the world, families have to make tough decisions when faced with a child that has gone off the beaten path. Do we try to get them back and hope for the best, thereby risking that their bad behavior will influence the other children who will try to emulate them? Or do we keep them at a distance and hope that they return? I do not know the answer to that question, but I do know that when that decision is made, it is made out of love, Chasidic or not.

Had this kind of coverage been about any other religious group, there would have been an outcry like we have never heard before. For some reason, when the Chassidic community is attacked, the silence is deafening. If the media wants to write bad things about Chassidim go right ahead and do it. But don’t use the tragic death of a young woman as a vehicle to spew hatred.

Barry Spitzer is a proud Chusid living in Borough Park, Brooklyn and can be written to at barryspitzer@gmail.com and followed on Twitter at @bspitzer

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Eida Ravaad Speaks Out in Harshest Terms Against RCA Pre-Nuptial Agreement

Raavad Moshe Sternbuch Shlitah
There are many Choshivah Rabbonim that actually support the RCA Pre-Nuptial Agreement, such as 
 Rav Ovadia Yosef z"l,, Rav ZN Goldberg, Rav Osher Weiss, as well as Rav מרדכי Willig and Rav Hershal Shachter etc.

Question: If you don't agree with someone, why say that the other side's understanding of the Halacha will lead to mamzeirim?

Why can't they just disagree?

Are you saying that the supporters of the RCA Pre-Nuptial Agreement are a bunch of AmaRatzim?

Rav Ovadia Yosef was an Am Haaretz C"V?

Where does this blatant animosity come from?

What has The Ravaad done for Agunois lately or ever?

Most Shaalos Utshuvois over the centuries dealt with Agunois actually. If you peruse some of those Tshuvois you see how pained the Rabbonim were over this, and tried every single way to free the Agunah... and the Agunah issue was no where close to the Agunois we have now ...
The Gedoilim have to do something quickly because if not .... then this "doing nothing" will actually lead to mamzeirim!
After WW2 there were hundreds of Agunois... most Rabbonim actually found Heiterim for them to remarry, and those who remained Agunois were very frum yiddishe mamas fun der alter heim...they remained Agunois for the rest of their lives...
just imagine after the torture in the camps, they had to endure loneliness for their entire lives!
Not all of today's agunois have that Amunah! 

Something must be done, and speaking out "harshly"  against those Gedoilim that are actually working on a solution...is asinine!
Is the RCA agreement a solution? I don't know but they are surely working on the problem,  Ravaad!

Eida Chareidis Ravaad HaGaon HaRav Moshe Sternbuch Shlita has come out in harsh terms against pre-nuptial agreements, which have become increasingly popular as rabbonim are working to prevent future agunos. 

A growing number of organizations that work to free agunos are backing such agreements, as are major rabbinical organizations around the world. 

In some cases, rabbonim will not marry a couple that does not have an accepted pre-nuptial agreement. It is important to point out that there are various texts and rabbonim who frequently marry couples are more in the know as to which texts are viewed as halachically acceptable to them. 


In his lengthy responsa the Ravaad addresses the pre-nuptial agreements, and Rav Sternbuch and other Gedolei Torah remain adamantly opposed to such agreements. 

The rav explains an agreement was brought to him, the version written and accepted by the Rabbinical Council of America.

After conducting a lengthy halachic discussion on the agreement, it is reported the rav has concluded the agreement may compel a husband to divorce his wife unjustifiably, and therefore he feels the agreement represents a ‘פרצה’, a break from acceptable tradition, adding the agreement does not carry great benefit with the exception of a small amount of women whose husbands make them agunos against halacha.


What has Rav Sternbuch more concerned is that he feels that on the other side, such an agreement may destroy the institution of marriage for if a husband does not want to give a divorce, which is often the case, the woman has worked it out but now, a woman can force her husband to divorce her. He adds that Rabbeinu Gerson made his cherem not to divorce a woman against her will so that there would not be too many divorces and therefore we would not create an agreement that will facilitate getting divorced.

The rav adds the agreement is bound to the courts and therefore, not what it appears to be on the surface.
שאף שלמראית עין הסכם זה כפוף לכאורה להוראות בית הדין מכל מקום אין זה אלא מסווה בלבד.

And finally, Rav Sternbuch calls on gedolei torah in Eretz Yisrael and the United States to sign against the agreement, which he fears may even R”L lead to mamzerus.
את דבריו חותם הגר”מ שטרנבוך באמירה חריפה וכותב “הנני קורא לגדולי תורה כאן ובארה”ב לעמוד בפרץ למחות נגד מתקני הסכם קודם נישואין שלא יתפשט תקנתם רח”ל, כי שטר הסכם נישואין זה אינו תקנה אלא תקלה, שהוא חורבן הדת ממש ומכשילין בחשש איסור אשת איש ומרבים ממזרים בישראל”.


Ezra Friedlander chastises Young Advocates for Fair Education! Upadated with Yaffed's response


The following is a letter by Ezra Friedlander attacking YAFFED!
My comments in RED
Yaffed's response below the article!

By Ezra Friedlander
Recently, we’ve been hearing much in the news about a group that calls itself Yaffed (Young Advocates For Fair Education).  They sent a letter to New York City Schools Chancellor Carmen Farina and seven district superintendents, calling upon them to investigate “the quality of secular education, and in particular English instruction, at (the listed) Yeshivas, and to take steps to ensure that pupils at these Yeshivas receive the essential and substantially equivalent education to which they are entitled.”
This group, led by Naftuli Moster, is causing a tremendous amount of controversy in our community, and I’d like to share my own thoughts here.
On the face of it, their proposal seems fair.  What could be more beneficial to our community than enhancing the quality of its education, even secular education?  In fact, my wife and I, who are parents of two young boys in the Yeshiva system, were recently also discussing this very same issue.
So what could be wrong with Yaffed’s proposal? Plenty!
In our community, mesorah (loosely translated as tradition, values, and fundamental beliefs) is the core of our educational system, a concept that has defined the Jewish people from time immemorial and has been the source of our continued survival.  So when a person like Mr. Moster and his organization comes along, calling on the New York State Department of Education to investigate our Yeshivas, my only response is:  “How dare you?  What right do you have to interfere with such sensitive and sacred matters?”
Do Moster’s claims have any validity at all?  That is irrelevant. 

DIN: Why is it irrelevant? For the last 30 years parents have been  fed up with the lack of secular education in the Yeshiva Systems, but are bullied into silence.. ask any parent of any child attending any Chareidie School!
Way before Mr. Moster wrote the letter to the NYS Dept of Education, they put billboards up warning the Yeshivos to do something....
Now years after their futile efforts they finally take some action by putting a fire under your collective  asses,  you attack them?
"sacred matters?”
taking money from the government and not providing services, is "sacred?" 
Mr. Moster's claims are absolutely valid.

 His actions speak louder than his words.  By what he has done, he has completely disqualified himself from the conversation.  He is like a prosecutor who is representing his case to the jury but has gathered evidence illegally.  Any judge would throw his case out of court without a moment’s delay.

DIN: What evidence has been gathered illegally?
 Why don’t we ask any Frum Teacher teaching in the Yeshivos, and ask them what they're teaching? 
Let's ask the teachers what is really going on? 
They will tell you, that all they do, is babysit!
The Yeshivas contrary to what Ezra says, don't care!
The children in the English classes in Yeshivos are by in large chuzpadik, and act like a bunch of untamed dogs!


Last year I met a non-frum English teacher of a well known Chareidie Yeshiva in Monsey, he also teaches in public school. He told me that the yeshiva students are a bunch of "savages" making "choizik" from him, throwing stuff at him and refusing to be taught. The sheer chutzpah is not to be believed,  whereas in public elementary school the children by in large behave.
He quit. He told me that in 35 years of teaching he was never as abused as in the Frum Yeshivos.
What a Chillul Hashem!

I had the occasion to go into an elementary public school last year and saw all the children sitting in their seats like little soldiers. The children in the hallways were accompanied by an adult and walked calmly to where they had to go. The very same day I picked up a child in a Frum Yeshivah early and the kids that were in the hallways were pushing and shoving each other with no adult in sight. Walking in the classroom  to pick up the 8 year old child was like walking into a wrestling ring, with the teacher shouting at the top of his lungs, trying  hard to calm the situation; the kids paid him no heed. 
Walking outside, I found out that it was recess, that explained the  total chaos with no organized sports, just kids fighting with sticks and beating the hell out of each other .... the Rebbe was calmly eating his orange as if this was ordinary day!


And by the way, isn't Mr Moster a product of the defunct Yeshivos? Isn't he himself legal evidence?

I highly doubt that this organization truly cares about our youth.  Or about the quality of our Yeshiva system.

DIN The Yeshivos don't care either. If the Yeshivos really  cared about our youth, they would be teaching them proper English, reading, writing and arithmetic.

 Because if they did desire to communicate effective change, they would not have gone about it by retaining the former Director of the New York Civil Liberties Union Norman Siegel (a man who I do respect on many levels) to represent their case.  It seems to me that, the sole purpose of this whole campaign is to besmirch our community’s reputation and to undermine our system at its core.  And for that I unequivocally condemn their efforts.

DIN: You Ezra, know more than anyone around, that this organization tried everything in their power, including contacting all major Yeshivos, and were rebuffed!

It pains me greatly that it takes this person and this organization to raise points about our system that do indeed need to be addressed.  They are hardly the proper messengers to deliver this message. 

DIN: Who, Ezra, are the “proper messengers” to deliver this message?” 
Why don't you do something about it, instead of bashing people that are trying to help?
You're the one shooting the messenger! 

In order to bring about productive change, the demand must come from the parents themselves and not from outside forces whose very mission is to attack our system with a viciousness and mean-spiritedness that will put our Yeshivas at risk.

DIN: Parents, as you very well know, Ezra, are thrilled that the Yeshivos even have a space for their children in their moisid, they will never speak up. 
The parents that do speak up are the ones with the mighty dollar, and they don’t need their children knowing English … they will be taken care of…. speaking English like a Russian with a Chinese Mandarin accent will be just fine.
But, what about the ordinary Szlub that punches a clock and wants a better life for his children …. What about him? Who will speak for him? He is terrified of opening his mouth, because he is  not paying full tuition. So who will listen to his silent cry?

Frankly, I personally feel that, by and large, our Yeshivas do adequately meet the State’s educational criteria. 

DIN: What? Yeshivos “do adequately meet” bla bla etc. WHAT??????
You insane?
Didn't you just say that you and your wife are worried that the Yeshivos are not addressing the issue?

 And most of us are very much aware of the serious failings within the New York public school system, so I would advise the DOE to focus on their own schools.

DIN: So  the NY Public Schools are in shambles ,….  are you suggesting we sit back and ignore the welfare of our own precious children?  Are you suggesting that our children be on par with the drug addicts of the public school systems?

Be that as it may, my goal here is not to criticize that system.  I’d rather focus on our own Yeshivas.

DIN: So Focus…. Whose stopping you? Why don’t you get off your high horse and “focus”!

When discussing this same issue, my wife and I came to the conclusion that it would be disingenuous for us to demand that our Yeshivas take on additional expenses at this time.  

DIN: Well I discussed it with my wife as well and we came to the conclusion that you and your wife are a bunch of morons and may I add "disingenuous."

They are sadly underfunded and struggling to survive.  Especially in the Chassidic world, where a minimum of four to six children in a family can be attending Yeshiva at any given time, tuition barely covers the necessities. So how can we possibly demand that they do more?

DIN: Crazy logic….. the yeshivos are doing poorly because the alumni are all in Kolleliem and nobody speaks English, nobody works… so who is going to support the Yeshiva system? How about changing the system and teach English to our children so they will be productive to society? Is that too much to ask?
"So how can we possibly demand that they do more?"
Whose asking them to do more? We are asking them to do the bare minimum that every single Yeshiva is supposed to do ...and that is teaching them English, reading, writing and arithmetic ...we are not asking for the yeshivos to teach history, geography or poetry, G-D forbid,.... we are asking for the basics!

Is there room for improvement?  Certainly.  But the only way to improve the system is through the united efforts of the parent body.

DIN: Helllloow? Are you listening? Again, the parent body is afraid to speak up, because their children will find themselves in public school!

It is our responsibility to ensure that our children are properly educated to prepare for their future, including giving them the tools to succeed in life.  The Torah demands that parents educate their children and the Yeshivas are essentially our shlichim in this endeavor.  But the onus is essentially upon us.  Parents should work together with the Yeshivos to create a curriculum that would allow their children to be properly trained to enter the workforce.  That is, after all, the stated objective of this campaign for change.

DIN: Hey Ezra? Are you still there????? Hellllooow?
Again and again, parents have their hands tied behind their back…. The’re not going to do doing a thing… 
they want to marry off their children, and they don't want some yenteh shadchtendeh to say "the parent of the girl is a big troublemaker, he is a crazy meshiginer he wants his kids to actually speak English" 

Its people that graduated from the archaic system like the people running the above mentioned organization that will do something!
Yup!

It’s important to me that my children are prepared to earn a livelihood and I take that responsibility very seriously.  If Mssrs Moster and Siegel would really care about this, I call on them to redirect their talents and energies to find creative ways to request that government funding be increased so that Yeshivas can enhance their curriculum. 

DIN: Government funding????? If you take government funding… 
your precious Yossily will find out that when he gets older he can marry Yankele!
Is that your solution? Mr. Friedlander, the Chuchem fin de ma nishtana?
More "government funding?' is that the reason why Chareidim voted for Obama and gay candidates? Because they are feeding your mosdos money? Is it all about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
I guess so!
Who can forget the headline in the blaring headline of  Vosizneis     

 "Ezra Friedlander: I’m Voting For Christine Quinn For Mayor, And So Should You"


Doing so would at least give them a seat at the table to participate in this conversation.  It would show that they truly care about our children.
The Jewish people have only survived through the millennia because of the wholesome purity of our chinuchsystem.  And that is uncompromising.  Back in 1892, Rabbi Naftali Zvi Yehuda Berlin, (the Netziv) actually shut down the famed Yeshiva in Volozhin because Russian authorities, prodded by members of the Haskalahmovement, sought to introduce secular studies to the Yeshiva.  He closed down the Yeshiva rather than submit to their demands.

DIN: Im not familiar with the Volozhin Yeshiva whose population wasn’t more than 300 students … a far cry to today’s yeshivah of thousands. In addition the Volozhin yeshivah students were by in large in their mid 20’s …and all were able to converse fluently, read and write in the language of the country.
Today’s yeshivah students cannot read a traffic sign.

I’m certainly not comparing the DOE to the communist regime.  I’m simply trying to demonstrate how sacred our Yeshivas are to our community and how outside interference can only be counterproductive. Moster certainly knows this. And calling on the DOE to investigate our Yeshivas tells me in no uncertain terms that his agenda is not to improve our Yeshivas, but to disrupt and destroy them.

DIN: When I went to a chassidishe yeshivah many moons ago, the Yeshiva had an adequate English Department, and so did many others…those graduates are still supporting their Alma Maters  and, may 
I add, supporting their grandchildren…
Moster will be the one who will force Yeshivas to come to their senses!

Sadly, his claim, as legitimate as it might be, has lost all credibility.  It reminds me of the halacha which states that a Sefer Torah written by an apikores (non believer) is not kosher and cannot ever be used.  I’m not accusing him or anyone else of being an apikores, just that their actions have invalidated their initial intent.

DIN: Is that what Moster reminds you? Hey Ezra? How did you get your job?
Do you speak English? Do you write English? I see you write pretty well.
You did nothing till now to foster and support a basic secular education in a Torah setting… so  shut up and let Moster's organization take care of business!

It pains me to write this article because I truly believe that positive change can be accomplished when there’s unity and people work together for a common cause.  But when it comes to our sacred mesorah and the education of our precious children, there is no compromise.  We must ensure that they are brought up al taharas hakodesh.
Don’t blame the messenger?  In this case, I do.

DIN: It "pains me" more to have read an article that contradicts itself and offers zero solutions! 
Adios Ezra!

Ezra Friedlander is the CEO of The Friedlander Group, a NYC and Washington DC based public policy consulting group.  Follow him at @ezrafriedlander on Twitter.  For more information, contact ezra@thefriedlandergroup.com or visit www.thefriedlandergroup.com.


Monday, August 3, 2015

Exposé: Jewish Foundations That Fund Boycotts of Israel

Ronn Torossian
The author is CEO of 5WPR, 1 of the 25 largest PR Agencies in the US.

As CEO of one of the largest independently owned American public relations firms, it was interesting to find this week that The Jewish Communal Fund (JCF) is seeking a “Public Relations and Marketing Associate”, who can “write blog posts”, and “identify articles and blog posts that are relevant to JCF and gain permissions to re-post on the JCF blog.” 

There is much information available online that I have shared recently - and I give them full permission to use any of the articles which I have written about them that show their support for organizations that boycott Israel.

In the last few months, numerous organizations and individuals have written about The Jewish Communal Fund, (JCF) the largest Jewish donor advised fund in the United States, which manages $1.3 billion in charitable assets. An organization for the mega-rich, they facilitate and promote charitable giving – it has been demonstrated that the JCF has given millions to The New Israel Fund, which actively supports a boycott of Israel.  

The JCF has also granted thousands of dollars to A Jewish Voice For Peace - which the ADL said “..uses its Jewish identity to shield the anti-Israel movement from allegations of anti-Semitism and provide a greater degree of credibility to the anti-Israel movement.”

The policy governing the Jewish Communal Fund notes: "'The Jewish Communal Fund is committed to supporting causes that promote the welfare and security of the Jewish community here and abroad. Consequently, as part of the grant review process, the Board of Trustees of the Jewish Communal Fund retains the right to deny any grant request where the purposes and activities of the recommended charitable organization are deemed to be adverse to the interests of the Jewish Community.”

Funding those who boycott Israel, therefore, is clearly unacceptable for The Jewish Communal Fund – and instead of hiring PR people, they should stop funding boycotters. The uber wealthy in America create foundations through which they give to charities - from yeshivas to community centers, healthcare organizations to childrens projects – but nothing can justify their donating to organizations that support a boycott of the State of Israel.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently said that those who fund boycotts against Israel must be exposed.  As Netanyahu explained, “We must not cave into the pressure, expose the lies and attack the attackers.” Netanyahu is right.

Buried in the tax-returns of numerous foundations is funding for organizations that support boycotts of Israel – and they must be exposed. 

The Jewish Communal Fund, as well as foundations including
 The Lopatin Family Foundation, 
The Annenberg Foundation, 
the Lisa and Douglas Goldman Fund, 
The Russell Berrie Foundation,
 J.S. & S. Michaan Foundation, 
the Jim Joseph Foundation, 
Leichtag Foundation,
 David Hochberg Foundation
 must stop giving millions to help organizations like the NIF and Jewish Voice for Peace damage Israel.

Harvard professor Ruth Wisse rightfully has noted that, “the rapid demoralization of Jews in the face of anti-Zionism… shows the depth of the influence of the past, for many have yet to achieve the simple self-respect that has been eluding the Jews collectively since the dawn of modernity.”

Reject the extremist foundations who fund boycotts of Israel.
Unless the foundations themselves change their donating patterns.

Where was Pres Rivlin and Netanyahu when Adele HY”D Died,

Adele Biton HY""D

Jews around the world were praying for the recovery of Adele Biton HY”D, who died in Shevat 5775 at the age of 5, a number of years after being gravely injured in a vehicular accident. 

She was traveling in a vehicle with her mother when they came under attack by Arabs hurling stones on the Trans-Samaria Highway. She was 3 at the time of the attack and accident, which left her fighting for her life and when her condition stabilized, she spent most of her remaining time in rehabilitation due to the neurological damage she sustained. - 


Mrs. Edva Biton, Adele’s mother, told Galei Yisrael Radio that when her daughter died she does not remember President Rivlin or Prime Minister Netanyahu visiting her. She expressed her anger over the actions and statements of President Reuven Rivlin whose has spoken out and visited with family members of the victims following the arson attack in Duma, which claimed the life of an Arab infant and left three others badly burned.

She stressed that while she has the utmost respect for President Rivlin, she does not understand his actions following the attack in the PA (Palestinian Authority) village. She explained he never visited her or Adele in the hospital, and never spoke out so sternly as he has done in this case. 

Mrs. Biton stated the same is true regarding Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who has made phone calls and hospital visits. She added the media covers such events differently as well, depending if the victim is Arab or Jewish. She spoke of the events that occur daily throughout Yehuda and Shomron, serious attacks, but most of these attacks are not reported in the media. She highlighted the fact that she is in no way approving of the fatal arson attack and one should not misinterpret her words, but her point is she does not understand the behavior of state leaders as compared to their response after Jews are killed. “…but chevra, what is happening here? I feel we are stigmatizing the kippa sruga community and they come to me as one of them. 
What connection do I have to these murderers? 
What connection to the murderers?

Mrs. Biton repeated the prime minister did not visit her as we have seen in recent days regarding the victims of the attack in Duma.

 “The honorable president did not come to me. The prime minister did not visit me”.

“I think we must denounce this act in every possible way. This is a murder of a baby. I permit myself to speak since I lost my daughter on the backdrop of hatred but dozens if not hundreds of people in Israel have lost their children in terror attack and all kinds of incitement, so I am asking, please, let’s not begin to be here. Everyone gets on the airwaves and is squeamish. We should be proud of our people”.