Powered By Blogger

Friday, October 23, 2015

American Jews Must Confront the Obama Administration on Israel

It is now evident that, by and large, the Jewish establishment has adopted a policy of deafening silence in relation to condemning or protesting against the virulent one-sided political attacks and sins of omission by the Obama administration concerning our barbaric adversaries.
 It is only the outspoken Zionist Organization of America and minor fringe groups that have been directly speaking out against the Obama administration’s intensified anti-Israel rhetoric.
Until now, I had a nagging suspicion that the failure of American Jewish leaders to confront the biased Obama administration attacks on Israel was not merely a reasoned strategic approach. But aware of their devotion to Israel and having witnessed their former stalwart defense of Jewish interests, I was reluctant to conclude that fear was their primary consideration.
But the ongoing silence by the Jewish establishment in relation to the current disgraceful behavior of the Obama administration, its secretary of state, and State Department spokesmen, is incomprehensible.
Today Israeli Jews are confronted by frenzied psychotic young Arabs who have been brainwashed into believing that murdering innocent Jews will deliver them directly to paradise and transform them into glorious martyrs. This barbarism, inculcated by hideous indoctrination from kindergarten and subsequently nurtured in the mosques and throughout Palestinian social media, is creating monsters. It is publicly sanctified by Abbas, who has whipped up a frenzy on the insanely false allegation that Israel is bent on destroying Al-Aqsa mosque and building a Jewish temple on its ruins.
The demonic madness is fortified by the heroic profile the Palestinian Authority adopts in relation to the killing sprees and which Abbas refuses to condemn. The perpetrators are also aware that if they survive, the P.A. will pay them generous salaries in prison and provide pensions for their families.
Under such circumstances, one would surely expect leaders of the civilized world to condemn these Arab murders of innocents. But aside from lip service condemning “violence,” world leaders and global organizations have, at best, adopted a sickening morally relativist position in which Jewish victims are equated with their murderers.
Until now, the United States took pride in defending Israel and proclaiming its shared values and common democratic Judeo-Christian heritage. Even though there were occasional policy differences between the countries, Israel considered itself a true ally of the U.S., irrespective of whether a Democrat or Republican occupied the Oval Office.
Since Barack Obama was elected president, in his obsession to build bridges between the U.S. and Islam, he sought to demonstrate that there is daylight between Israel and America. His Third World outlook also led to his abandoning long-term U.S. allies and groveling to Islamic fundamentalist terrorist states like Iran, mistakenly believing that by appeasing them, they will become more moderate.
Over the past month, we have witnessed the climax of the U.S. political abandonment of Israel. Obama, who repeatedly condemned Netanyahu for remarks made in the heat of an election, even after he had clarified and withdrawn them, has emboldened the Palestinian extremists by failing to utter a single condemnation of Mahmoud Abbas for his vicious ongoing incitement and calls for Jewish blood.
Worse still was Secretary of State John Kerry, frequently referred to as an unguided missile, who made a series of inexcusable demented remarks. He refused to apportion the blame for the killings, and even hinted that the Israelis had brought the violence upon themselves. He related to “violence on both sides.” Both sides?
He claimed that the Palestinian killings had been ignited by Palestinian “frustration” over the failure to negotiate a two-state solution and the “massive increase of settlements over the course of the last few years.” This bears no relevance to the facts, as settlement building in the last few years has been dramatically reduced. The frenzied killers are unquestionably motivated by the incitement and lies being promoted insisting that Jews plan to destroy Al-Aqsa.
Kerry also demanded that the status quo at the Temple Mount be upheld “in word and deed,” knowing fully well that this has constantly been the policy of the Netanyahu government. Such ambiguous statements gives credence to the Palestinian lies.
State Department spokesman John Kirby even accused Israel of violating the status quo on the Temple Mount – and thus effectively also fanning the inflammatory Al Aqsa frenzy and called on “both leaders” to combat the incitement which leads to a “cycle of violence.” He was subsequently forced to retract, but the damage could not be undone. He also stated that the U.S. had “seen some reports of security activity that could indicate the potential excessive use of force” against the psychotic killers.
To top off these outrageous outbursts, Obama made a statement assiduously avoiding use of the term terrorist and patronizingly endorsed Israel’s right to “protect its citizens from knife attacks” from “random violence (sic).” He then spat in our faces by effectively blaming both Netanyahu and Abbas for the incitement.
For Israel’s one true ally to descend to such Orwellian depths as to place the Israelis in the same category as religious fanatics operating a killing spree is utterly contemptible, encourages the barbarians to accelerate their murderous activity and thus assumes a share of responsibility for the innocent Jews murdered in the days to come.
To compound matters, the White House critiques also serve as a green light for Europe to pressure Israel into making further unilateral concessions which would undermine its security.
Under diplomatic constraints, Netanyahu has instructed ministers not to respond to the shameful remarks by the administration and its spokesmen.
But such restraints do not apply to American Jewish leaders. In the face of such a reprehensible attitude by the Obama administration to Israel at a time when psychotic murderers have been programmed to kill Jews in the streets, one would have expected the American Jewish community’s leadership to condemn their government and launch public protests.
American Jews continuously stress that in the U.S. they can speak out as Jews without fear. Yet when it comes to criticizing Obama, despite the fact that the majority of the nation and both houses of Congress support Israel, a deafening silence envelops the Jewish leadership.
I make these remarks in my capacity as a former Diaspora Jewish leader rather than an Israeli. I was head of the Australian Jewish community and chairman of the Governing Board of the World Jewish Congress, and have personally experienced the enormous pressures which can be exerted against a leader to be politically correct and avoid confronting his government when it adopts positions which lack moral compass and harm the interests of the Jewish people.
But there is a time when leaders must speak out or be damned. The U.S. refuses to pressure Abbas to cease calling for the murder of Jews and instead engages in moral equivalency, holding victims and perpetrators equally responsible for the violence. No American administration has ever behaved in such an appalling manner toward Israel.
Yet the sole response of the Jewish establishment, as manifested by the major Jewish religious movements in conjunction with the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, is to observe a “Sabbath of Jewish Solidarity.” This reflects the solidarity of American Jews with Israel during these difficult times, but it is certainly is not an acceptable response to the administration’s lies and distortions.
Unless American leaders speak up now, they will be justly accused of following in the footsteps of the American Jewish leader the late Rabbi Stephen Wise, who in 1944, under pressure from Roosevelt, remained silent when Jews were being murdered by the Nazis.
It would be outrageous if a response is being withheld out of a desperate desire to maintain consensus at the lowest common denominator. Likewise, if the motivation is not to distress deluded Jewish liberal contributors or a concern about coveted access to the White House, these factors are simply irrelevant under the current circumstances.
Principled Jewish supporters of Israel must speak out and protest now, even if this means dividing the community.
If Jews remain silent in the face of the libels directed against the Jewish state by the administration, aside from failing to provide an example for their children, they will be betraying their responsibility as Jewish leaders.
Isi Leibler may be contacted at ileibler@leibler.com
This article was originally published by The Jerusalem Post and Israel Hayom. 

Mr. Stanley Goldstein z”l, Owner of Bencraft Hatters


It is with great sadness that we report the passing of Mr. Shloime Elimelech Goldstein, owner of the renowned hat store chain Bencraft Hatters.
He was 83.
Stanley was known to frum Jews around New York and the world as the owner of the Bencraft hat store in Brooklyn’s Williamsburg area that was established in 1949 by his father, Ben Goldstein.
Stanley joined the business in 1954, which soon expanded to a second location on 13th Avenue in Boro Park, Brooklyn.
Chassidim of all types have been purchasing their hats from Goldstein for generations, which were sold with his unique personality and charm.
“He was a very charming, personable and generous person,” Bencraft employee Yitzi Feigenson told COLlive.com. “He had a smile that really struck you. He was a true gentleman.”
A resident of Kew Gardens Hills, Queens, Goldstein, along with his son Steven, are generous supporters of a number of causes.
“He was a legend,” said long-time employee in the Boro Park store Asher Bitton. “He was a ba’al Tzedaka to so many people and organizations. People had no idea of the extent of his kindess.”
The levaya will take place tomorrow, Friday at 11:00 am at Sinai Chapels, 162-05 Horace Harding Expy, Fresh Meadows, NY 11365.

Thursday, October 22, 2015

Chutzpah: After Holocaust remark, White House warns Netanyahu against incitement

The sheer madness and chutzpah of the White House ... read the following  then read below:

Comments made by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earlier in the week, which implicated the former grand mufti of Jerusalem in the decision to proceed with the Holocaust, amount to inflammatory rhetoric stoking tensions on the ground between Israel and the Palestinians, the White House said on Thursday.

In a speech on Tuesday, Netanyahu said that Palestinian Haj Amin al-Husseini was directly responsible for encouraging Adolf Hitler not just to expel Jews from Europe, but to exterminate them. Netanyahu has since clarified that he had no intention of absolving Hitler for responsibility for the Holocaust.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters the Obama administration has no doubt who was responsible for the genocide, which involved the systematic murder of six million Jews.

"The inflammatory rhetoric needs to stop," Earnest said. 

On Wednesday, the State Department declined to characterize Netanyahu's specific remarks as incitement, but added: "Scholarly evidence does not support that position," referring to the prime minister's historical account.

Earnest's comments come just hours after Netanyahu met with Secretary of State John Kerry in Berlin to discuss the violence across Israel and the West Bank in recent weeks.

The Holocaust:
The Mufti and the Führer

(November 1941)


HolocaustTable of Contents | Concentration Camps | Jewish Persecution


Print Friendly and PDF
In 1941, Haj Amin al-Husseini fled to Germany and met with Adolf HitlerHeinrich HimmlerJoachim Von Ribbentropand other Nazi leaders. He wanted to persuade them to extend the Nazis’ anti-Jewish program to the Arab world.
The Mufti sent Hitler 15 drafts of declarations he wantedGermany and Italy to make concerning the Middle East. One called on the two countries to declare the illegality of the Jewish home in Palestine. Furthermore, “they accord to Palestine and to other Arab countries the right to solve the problem of the Jewish elements in Palestine and other Arab countries, in accordance with the interest of the Arabs and, by the same method, that the question is now being settled in the Axis countries.”1
In November 1941, the Mufti met with Hitler, who told him the Jews were his foremost enemy. The Nazi dictator rebuffed the Mufti's requests for a declaration in support of the Arabs, however, telling him the time was not right. The Mufti offered Hitler his “thanks for the sympathy which he had always shown for the Arab and especially Palestinian cause, and to which he had given clear expression in his public speeches....The Arabs were Germany's natural friends because they had the same enemies as had Germany, namely....the Jews....” Hitler replied:
Germany stood for uncompromising war against the Jews. That naturally included active opposition to the Jewish national home in Palestine....Germany would furnish positive and practical aid to the Arabs involved in the same struggle....Germany's objective [is]...solely the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere....In that hour the Mufti would be the most authoritative spokesman for the Arab world. The Mufti thanked Hitler profusely.2
In 1945, Yugoslavia sought to indict the Mufti as a war criminal for his role in recruiting 20,000 Muslim volunteers for theSS, who participated in the killing of Jews in Croatia and Hungary. He escaped from French detention in 1946, however, and continued his fight against the Jews from Cairo and later Beirut. He died in 1974.

Read more about the conversation between Hitler and the Mufti, CLICK HERE.


Sources:
1 “Grand Mufti Plotted To Do Away With All Jews In Mideast,” Response, (Fall 1991), pp. 2-3.
Record of the Conversation Between the Fuhrer and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem on November 28, 1941, in the Presence of Reich Foreign Minister and Minister Grobba in Berlin, Documents on German Foreign Policy, 1918-1945, Series D, Vol. XIII, London, 1964, p. 881ff in Walter Lacquer and Barry Rubin, The Israel-Arab Reader, (NY: Facts on File, 1984), pp. 79-84.

Coping with terrorism through faith

Terrorism tries to sow panic and cause the public to give up. Israelis are finished with delusions of peace, so terrorism will not achieve its goal, but a rational, gradual, and realistic means of teaching the Torah view must be proposed.
Rabbi Eliezer Melamed
The writer is Head of Yeshivat Har Bracha and a prolific author on Jewish Law, whose works include the series on Jewish law "Pininei Halacha" and a popular weekly column "Revivim" in the Besheva newspaper. His books "The Laws of Prayer" "The Laws of Passover" and "Nation, Land, Army" are presently being translated into English. Other articles by Rabbi Melamed can be viewed at: www.yhb.org.il/1

The War on Arab Terror
People are very worried about the Arab terror raging in the streets. This is the goal of terrorism - attacking a few people and sowing panic among the public at large, causing them to surrender their assets and interests in hopes of gaining peace and quiet.
Even in the recent weeks in which terror has raised its evil head, more people were killed in traffic accidents, many of which could have been avoided. Despite this, the fear of terror is far greater than that of road accidents, because the terrible evil of acts of murder captures the mind and arouses fear and horror.

The Effect of Terrorism on the Left and Right
The goal of terrorism is to weaken our hold on the country; in practice however, its influence branches in different directions, according to the state of mind and moral fiber of those attacked.
There are some Jews who weren’t interested in living in Israel in the first place and fled here only because of the Holocaust and other troubles in the Diaspora. Terror petrifies and paralyzes many of them. They would be willing to accept any withdrawal or humiliation, just as long as the fear of terrorism is removed.
There are some Jews who go a step further – their hearts are drawn in a sick manner to the figure of the killer, striving to understand and justify the motives for his wickedness, hoping that perhaps in this way they will find a solution to the situation. In an effort to do so, they are forced to skew their moral viewpoint, as one can hear by listening to the Leftists.
And then there are Jews with a healthy moral consciousness for whom justice is imperative, those who are not willing or able to surrender to terrorism. The exact opposite – it spawns within them a reverse reaction, and a strong will to fight back.

The Division between Right and Left
In order to analyze the issue properly, it is important to first define the basic essentials. In practice, the dividing line between Jews for whom terrorism overpowers and compels them to concessions on land and rights, and those who terrorism triggers a desire to fight back is based on one’s attitude towards the Land of Israel.

Those Tending to the Left
Jews who tend to the Left never really wanted to immigrate to Israel in the first place, and only when the troubles in the Diaspora were about to drown them, did they decide to go. Some chose to immigrate to Israel and not move abroad to America or other foreign countries; some had no choice but to immigrate to Israel because no other country agreed to accept them. Consequently, the Holocaust for them is the supreme justification for the existence of the State of Israel. Their descendants live in Israel because they got used to the country and their friends and family are here as well. The majority of them have a certain connection to the Bible, the People and the Land, but they wouldn’t weep if fate somehow brought them to a Western country. For them, annual visits to Israel would suffice.
These are the Jews willing fall for any “peace” proposal. Even for the slightest chance of quiet they are willing to give up parts of the homeland. In exchange for a temporary lull in the international arena, they are willing to give up the basic fundamentals of sovereignty and Jewish identity.

Those Tending to the Right
Those tending to the right view immigration to Israel and the blossoming of its wilderness as a process of Redemption for the People and Land of Israel, based on the mitzvot of the Torah and Prophetic visions, or at very least, based on a national and historic mandate. True, most of them immigrated to Israel only after the troubles in the Diaspora increased dramatically. But after being forced to flee, they saw in the settling of the Land a phase of Redemption. The supreme justification of Israel's existence for them are the mitzvot of the Torah, or at very least, a national historic right.
These people are willing to sacrifice and pay the price in order to secure Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria. Only in a situation of absolute duress would they be prepared to withdraw; short of such circumstances, they would prefer suffering international condemnation and terrorism, and not retreat. Arab terror spurs them to fight back, and expand Jewish presence in the area.

Those in the Middle
The majority of the public is somewhere in the middle; they understand both the Right and the Left. Ideally, they prefer the approach of the Right, but for increased security would be inclined to lean to the Left. When such people are successfully deceived into thinking that withdrawals will bring peace, they are tempted to support the retreat. When they fail to be deceived, they will oppose withdrawals and violation of sovereignty.

A Cautious Assessment: Terrorism Will Fail
Presently, it appears that most of Israeli public leans to the Right - unfortunately, not thanks to a deepening of Jewish identity, but mainly because reality has refused to toe the line to the delusions of peace. Consequently, chances are the current wave of terror will not achieve its goal – on the contrary, it will strengthen Jewish identity and harm the Arabs who rise up against us.

The Security Question and Its Roots
It is interesting that when the two sides debate, they often gear themselves with security, economic, social and moral claims, without being aware of the roots of their arguments. When it comes down to it, those who are more firmly connected to the Torah, People, and Land of Israel find realistic arguments for settling the Land, while those who are not will find realistic claims for withdrawal.

The Path to Security
Invariably, over the long term, people who only worried about not dying faced greater harm than those who made an effort to live. For example, Jews in Europe were extremely worried for their lives. They felt the growing anti-Semitism, and tried to do anything to survive. However, since their main concern was how not to die, they feared making aliyah to Israel, because someone whose main desire is not to die is afraid to face reality and have the courage to do what it takes to increase his chances of survival. Therefore, when the Jews in Europe heard about Arab terrorism in Israel before WWII, they were afraid and remained in the Diaspora, and ultimately were harmed sevenfold.
In contrast, a person who wants to live and sees the meaning in his life dares to act even under risk and self-sacrifice to fulfill his life’s purpose. And if his actions are carried out within the framework of rational considerations, he is able to survive longer.
The same is true concerning illnesses: a person who is always worried about getting sick is usually more ill. In contrast, a person whose life is full of content is usually healthier.
When the primary desire of the Left is that the State of Israel not be harmed, it brings upon the country far more economic, social and securityproblems than the Right, who are not willing to give up on our national identity.

The Problem of the Faith-based Right
Recent years have proven that the Right was correct. Withdrawals did not increase security, rather, the exact opposite. The Arab world did not soften their views towards us, but instead became more radical. The Western world also stepped-up its delusional demands of us, despite all the concessions we already made.
Representatives of the faith-based Right foresaw all of this. So why is it that the public at large does not accept the positions of the faith-based Right? Why is the public still willing to listen to the nonsense of all the commentators and experts from academia and graduates of the intelligence community, chattering incessantly in the media? After all, it has been proven time and again how they embroiled governments in complicated and dangerous concessions, and have never been able to predict the future.
It appears the reason is that often, the faith-based Right proposes implausible suggestions based on wishful thinking and beliefs rather than on reality. The public fears that these irrational positions are liable to endanger their existence. Who knows? Faith-based leaders might suddenly decide to destroy the mosques on the Temple Mount and provoke a world war. Or maybe they’ll apply sovereignty over territories in Judea and Samaria while giving full citizenship to the Arabs living there. Or alternatively, maybe they will come out with a program of immediate deportation of most of the Arabs, causing the entire world to rise up against the State of Israel.
The various commentators indeed are always mistaken because they fail to understand the meaning of national identity and faith and therefore do not understand the motives of the enemy or the source of strength of the People of Israel. However, the information they provide is factual and solid, and their arguments are drawn from the here and now, without relying on miracles. Consequently, the public is willing to listen to them even though they do not trust their suggestions.
In such a situation, the public prefers the leadership of Prime Minister Netanyahu. Although he concerns himself mainly with survival, and only occasionally credits us with little flickers of faith, national achievements, and settling the land, nevertheless, his considerations are rational and based on solid reality, free of the grave errors of the failed commentators.

A Proposal for a Gradual, Faith-Based Approach
This situation can be improved if we present a comprehensive and idealistic vision as written in the Torah and the Prophets, while at the same time offering a gradual way of achieving it, taking into maximal consideration reality – including Israeli public opinion and that of the international community, and the powers they represent.
For example, concerning the Temple Mount, a suggestion can be made that from now on, every preacher who incites and speaks out against Israel or the Jews, and any Muslim who disturbs those ascending the Temple Mount by screaming or other actions will not be permitted to go up the Temple Mount. This is a proportionate measure whose reasoning can be understood by any normal person anywhere.
Similarly, with regard to the continuation of settlement in Judea and Samaria: It is possible to expand the existing communities on state-owned land without depriving any Arab who has property rights. In this way, friction will be reduced in all respects – settlement will be regulated by law without any complaints of discrimination and dispossession, and all the positive energy of the "settlers" will be directed to completely legal areas of the State of Israel, without an attempt to seize land that is not regulated or privately owned.
It is also possible to gradually apply Israeli sovereignty over Jewish communities and uninhabited areas in Judea and Samaria, while proposing regional autonomy to the local Arab leadership.
It is certainly possible to demand loyalty from Israeli Arab citizens.
This gradual process does not demand conceding any rights of the Jewish people, but only exercises our rights incrementally, in the sense of: "I will drive them out from before you gradually, until you have grown in number and can take possession of the land” (Exodus 23:30).

Learning Logic from Within the Torah
To be able to put across this kind of leadership and approach, Torah must be learned in a more complete and truthful way, so that its practical logic will shine forth "as the sun in the afternoon". Today, many people fulfill the mitzvot for mystical reasons, while declaring that although practical considerations indicate the opposite, faith trumps logic and nature. Many even take pride in this, because in their view, the absolute believer must ignore practical considerations.
They are, however, gravely mistaken and damage the cause of Torah, for even though the roots of Torah and the Jewish faith are in the Heavens,  the entire revelation of the Torah is logical and practical halakha (Jewish law).

This article appears in the ‘Besheva’ newspaper, and was translated from Hebrew. Other interesting and informative articles by Rabbi Melamed and his highly acclaimed series of Jewish law and thought “Peninei Halakha” can be found at: http://en.yhb.org.il/

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Yisroel Dovid Weiss YM"S Speaking at PLO rally in Toronto

This bloody bastard, may G-d obliterate him and his honchos soon in our time, is wearing the cursed scarf of the Palestinians around his cursed neck. He comes from Zera Ameliek!

Jews are been stabbed in Yerushalyim and this savage teams up with the biggest anti-Semites and joins the Palestinian  animals in a united front against Jews living in Israel!
May he and the Palestinians that he loves so much, meet the virgins soon!

Obama, Kerry and the Stabbing of Jews

There is something very wrong with the Obama administration's "balanced approach".



What kind of person gets up in the morning, searches his kitchen for the longest and sharpest knife in the drawer, and then goes out looking to murder a Jew?

What kind of a person takes a knife and plunges it into the back or neck of an elderly Jewish woman or a Jewish child on a bicycle?

What kind of a person circulates instructions over the Internet on the most effective way to stab a Jew, making sure that either the heart or the jugular vein is targeted in the attack?

What kind of a person encourages teenagers to engage in stabbing Jews, justifies their conduct and celebrates their achievements? 

The answer to all four questions is two simple words: “evil” and “barbaric.”

Let’s assume, for the sake of discussion, that the Arabs of Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria have a legitimate grievance. Let’s ignore the fact that
  • None of them is under any physical threat by the Israeli government and that the rare occurrence of Jewish violence against Arabs is strongly and publicly condemned by Israel and met with harsh criminal sanctions;
  • They have freedom of speech, the right to free enterprise, the right to worship freely, the right to elect their leaders and the right to receive billions of dollars in Israeli and foreign aid;
  • They live in the only country in the Middle East that would provide them such freedoms and funds; and
  • Access to the Temple Mount – the holiest site in the Jewish religion – is available for prayer only to Muslims and not Jews!
Ignoring all that, and giving the Arabs the benefit of every doubt, the Arab grievance is, at most, political. It is not existential. And people simply don’t stab their adversaries in a political fight. They just don’t.

Throughout history, even people under immediate and horrific assault did not plan out attacks against old women and young children. 

When Jews were fighting the Nazis in the forests of Europe, with all their suffering and justifiable rage, never did they organize or even contemplate such assaults. 
Here, in the United States, the African-Americans kidnapped from their homeland and sold into slavery, with every reason to violently oppose their circumstances, never developed a campaign of stabbing attacks against old women and young children. 
Never. Because such conduct, no matter the grievance, is evil and barbaric. And people who are not evil by nature, or taught to be evil by cynical, immoral and corrupt teachers, simply don’t do these things.

Now, what does this have to do with Obama and Kerry? 
Unfortunately, everything. Their nuanced and “balanced” reaction to the stabbing of Jews is heard and felt around the world and is the antithesis of the cries of outrage and indignation that one would expect of the leaders of the free world to evil and barbarism.

When they express a lack of “clarity” as to Israel’s position regarding the Temple Mount even though Israel’s position is crystal clear, when they urge both sides to reduce their hostilities even though only one side is hostile, and when they suggest that Mahmoud Abbas is a peace-loving moderate even though he is inciting the worst kind of murder and mayhem, the world is listening.

 Other nations less “friendly” to Israel certainly see no reason to come to Israel’s defense, and the terrorists who are engaging in this barbarism consider themselves justified and protected.

British statesmen, Edmund Burke, made the famous statement, “Evil flourishes when good men do nothing.” 
Right now, the leadership of the United States is doing nothing and, as a result, evil and barbarism against innocent Jews flourishes in Israel and elsewhere around the world. 

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Thanks to Rav Shmuel Kaminetzky's ruling that children not be Vaccinated, Whooping Cough Cases Spike In Frum Brooklyn Neighborhoods

Those following Rav Shmuel Kaminetzy's recommendation to refrain from administrating vaccinations to infants and children should immediately keep their children home and not have those children spread deadly diseases! 
A wave of whooping cough has hit the frum Brooklyn neighborhoods of Crown Heights, Williamsburg and Borough Park, city health officials said Monday.
A total of 109 cases of pertussis, or whooping cough, were reported over the past year in the three neighborhoods, with an increase in cases over the past four months, the Health Department said, according to a New York Post report.
Five infants were hospitalized and one came down with pneumonia.
Most years, there are 200 cases of whooping cough reported in the entire city.
Toddlers and infants make up the majority of cases. About half were not vaccinated at all or didn’t get the full set of shots, authorities said in an alert to medical providers.
Only 3 percent of the 37 mothers of infants with whooping cough received the recommended tetanus-diptheria-acellularr pertussis vaccination during pregnancy, the alert said.
Health officials are urging doctors to recall patients who are not up to date with vaccines so they can provide prompt antibiotic treatment to affected patients.
“Delays in on-time initiation and completion of the pertussis-containing vaccines series remain problematic in the affected communities, facilitating ongoing transmission,” said Jennifer Rosen, director of the Health Department’s Bureau of Immunization Surveillance.
Children receiving treatment must stay home and not attend school or day care until they have received at least five days of antibiotics.
Family members of patients should also receive antibiotics to prevent spreading the contagious respiratory disease.
Source: New York Post

Rabbi Auerbach the Fanatic Rosh Yeshivah requests that Chareidi Sodiers Not be stationed in Chareidie Neighborhoods!

Rabbi Shmuel Auerbach, who has been single for 25 years, is the fanatical Rosh Yeshivah of Maalot Hatorah. 
He now insists that Chareidi Soldiers who are ready to give their lives for Klall Yisroel, not be stationed in Yerushalyim or any other Chareidie Neighborhood.
His crazed message was given by his assistant Mr. Chaim Epstein who is Yerusalyim's deputy mayor. Someone should send him to a funny farm!
The reason for this Meshugana request, is that the stationing of Chareidie Soldiers in Chareidei neighborhoods will destroy the city's spirituality!
Crazy stuff!

Don't wonder why moshiach is taking his time!

'בני תורה': לא רוצים חיילים חרדים בשכונה

לא ייאמן: צה"ל מבקש להגן על תושבים בשכונות כגון גאולה ומאה שערים, אבל סגן ראש העיר מסיעת בני תורה מאיים להפריע לכוחות הביטחון בעבודתם אם אלו יהיו חיילים מהמגזר החרדי. הסיבה: קלקול רוחני

בסיעת בני תורה דורשים שלא להציב חיילים חרדים בשכונות החרדיות מחשש לקלקול רוחני. האיום: הפרעה לכוחות הביטחון והתנכלות לחיילים חרדים. סגן ראש העיר חיים אפשטיין: "במסגרת חופש הביטוי רשאי ומחויב כל יהודי חרדי להביע מחאתו נגד פורצי גדר מסוג זה המבקשים לשנות את האטמוספרה הטהורה של שכונותינו"


גל הטרור הנוכחי המאופיין במפגעים בודדים שמתפרצים בדקירות בריכוזים חרדים ונגד חובשי כיפה הביא לקונפליקט בקרב פלגים במגזר החרדי שמתנגדים לגיוס חרדים לצה"ל ואף לכל קשר בין המגזר החרדי לחיילים.

בוועד הסוחרים בשכונת גאולה ביקשו לתגבר סיורי ביטחון ולהערכתם בשל גל טרור חלה התקרבות בין המגזר החרדי לצה"ל והתנכלות הקיצוניים לחיילי צה"ל תיפסק. אלא שמנגד בפלגים הקיצוניים דורשים דווקא שלא להציב חיילים חרדים בריכוזים חרדים כשהם מזהירים מהפגנות מחאה והפרעה לכוחות הביטחון.
ההתנגדות הפומבית למהלך, שנועד לכאורה להעדיף חיילים מהמגזר בשל היכרותם, הגיעה מסגן ראש העיר חיים אפשטיין (בני תורה) שביקש להרחיק בעלי חזות חרדית המשרתים בצה"ל מהשכונות החרדיות לשם הוזרמו כוחות ביטחון בשל גל הפיגועים.אפשטיין שטוען כי גורמים בצבא מנצלים את המצב הביטחוני להחדרת מסרים המעודדים גיוס לצה"ל ולמשטרה ופוגעים בחינוך החרדי, אף הזהיר מההשלכות
שעלול לגרור הצקות לחיילים ולהביא להעסקת כוחות שיטור נוספים שייאלצו להגן על החיילים.

"הרי מקבלי ההחלטות מצהירים כי לנגד עיניהם עומדת המטרה המרכזית של הרגעת הרוחות והחזרת החיים לשגרה. מה הטעם איפה בניסיונות הזויים לעורר מדנים בצורה כזו ובשעות קשות אלו? האם אותם חיילים יוצבו בצורה פרובוקטיבית רק כדי שתוך זמן קצר יהיה צורך בהזרמת כוחות שיטור נוספים לצורך טיפול בסערת הרוחות, הזעם הציבורי והעימותים הקולניים שיתפתחו במקום ודי להגן עליהם מפני המוחים נגד תופעת לובשי המדים בחזות חרדית?", כך לדבריו.

מנגד, בסיעות ש"ס ויהדות התורה מתנגדים לדרישה וחלקם אף זעמו על ההצעה אותה הגדירו "הזויה" ו"חצופה". "מי אנחנו שנתערב בשיקולי ביטחון בגלל מחלוקות פנים חרדיות" הסבירו ביהדות התורה.


Ezra Friedlander demands the City give Yeshivas $$$$$ with no oversight!

This Ezra Friedlander that stabbed Holocaust Survivors in the back, now wants Yeshivas to receive money even though  graduates of Yeshivah cannot read write or speak English  and cannot do simple arithmetic!

He admits that he himself cannot add, subtract and do simple division and never graduated High School. He admits that he cannot calculate a tip in a restaurant and claims that he functions in society.  
He seriously believes  that all Yeshivah graduates go into a field of "Tuchas Lekking" politicians, as he did with Fat Nadler who supported a bill to hand Nuclear weapons to Iran, a country that vowed to annihilate the State of Israel! 
 This business of "Tuches Lekking" requires minimal education and there is no need for arithmetic in that field!

My wife is a teacher in a boys school in Monsey and says teaching in Yeshivas is like walking into an active war zone. 
The kids have no respect for English teachers. 


WATCH: IDF Arrest Top Hamas Murderer Before Dawn









 Israel has arrested a top Hamas official in the Shomron region

The military says it arrested Hassan Yousef on Tuesday near Ramallah. It marks the most high-profile arrest since a wave of unrest swept through the region a month ago.
The military said Yousef had been “actively instigating and inciting terrorism” by encouraging attacks against Israelis. 
Military spokesman Lt. Col. Peter Lerner says, “Hamas’ leaders cannot expect to propagate violence and terror from the comfort of their living rooms and pulpits of their mosques.”
Yousef is a co-founder of Hamas whose son, Mosab, later spied for Israel between 1997 and 2007.

Political Cartoon


The MOST Important Video About Israel You'll Ever See!


Some good news about Israel


Monday, October 19, 2015

UNESCO draft resolution: Western Wall is part of al-Aksa mosque



Israel is working to thwart a draft UNESCO resolution which declares that the Western Wall in Jerusalem — the most holy site in Judaism— belongs to the the Muslim al-Aksa Mosque compound.

The drat text to be voted on Wednesday in Paris states that UNESCO “affirms that the Buraq Plaza is an integral part of the Al-Aksa Mosque/Al-Haram Al-Sharif.” 

Israel’s Ambassador to UNESCO, Carmel Shama HaCohen, said that the resolution was “a total Islamization” of a site that is revered by both the Jewish and Muslim faiths.

The six page draft resolution submitted by Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates on behalf of the Palestinian Authority to the UNESCO Executive Board, broadly condemns Israeli actions in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.

At no point does the resolution mention the Jewish historical connection to Jerusalem, which dates back to Biblical times. Nor does it reference the Temple Mount or the Western Wall, which was part of the Second Temple before it was destroyed 2,000 years ago.

It relies solely on Arabic names for the holy sites on and around the Temple Mount in Jerusalem’s Old City.

In the past, the United Nations Scientific, Cultural and Educational Organization has typically approved resolutions condemning Israeli actions in Jerusalem, but Israel is working to thwart none of those texts have so blatantly attempted to reclassify the Western Wall.

The Palestinians were expected to have an automatic majority of approval among the 58-member states of the UNESCO Executive Board for a broad based anti-Israel resolution on Jerusalem and the Temple Mount.

But that support doesn’t extend to reclassifying the Western Wall as part of a religious Muslim site, HaCohen said.

The resolution may fail unless the line about the Buraq Plaza is removed, he said.

“To disconnect the Jewish people from the Western Wall is one step to much, even for nations that are the most anti-Israel,” HaCohen said.

The timing is also problematic, he said. The issue of the Temple Mount has already sparked Palestinian violence against Jewish citizens of Israel, he said.

Aside from the issue of the Western Wall, this resolution, which solely condemn Israeli actions on the Temple Mount will only further inflame passions on this issue and lead to more bloodshed, he said.

It gives a “stamp of authenticity” to Palestinian violence against Israel, HaCohen said.

If UNESCO states that Israel is harming Muslim worshippers “it only adds more fuel to the fire,” said HaCohen as he warned that “both sides will pay in blood for that decision.”

Omri Levy, 19, from Moshav Sdei Chemed, is the soldier who was murdered in the terrorist attack in Be'er Sheva.


The name of the IDF soldier who was murdered in Sunday’s terrorist attack at the Be’er Sheva Central Bus Station is Omri Levy, 19, from Moshav Sdei Hemed in central Israel, near Kfar Saba.

Levy, a corporal, was promoted to the rank of sergeant after his death. His family has been notified, the IDF Spokesperson said in a statement.

Meanwhile, the Soroka Hospital in Be’er Sheva announced that a citizen of Eritrea, who was suspected of being a terrorist and was shot by security forces after the attack, died from his wounds at the hospital.

Nine people were wounded in Sunday’s attack, which was carried out by a terrorist armed        with a handgun and knife.

The terrorist shot Levy and killed him, and then took his M-16 semiautomatic assault rifle and began firing it at a group of policemen, four of whom were injured.

Hamas earlier on Sunday welcomed the terrorist attack, saying it is “another heroic action against the occupation, which is on high alert. Our people will not be afraid of anything.”

Hamas spokes Husam Badran added that the attack was a response to the "cold-blooded executions of the military of the occupation."

Neturei Karta Mamzeirim Leading Huge Anti-Israel Rally In Times Square

May HKB"H eradicate these living bastards YM"S with Hamas and Hezbollah together!