“I don’t speak because I have the power to speak; I speak because I don’t have the power to remain silent.” Rav Kook z"l

Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Why is Spain occupying Arab territory?

 

Dr. Rafael Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies.

Last week’s controversy over tens of thousands of Moroccans trying to enter Spain (amid antisemitic social media posts attempting to blame Israel) has reminded the world of an uncomfortable fact: While Spain regularly accuses Israel of “occupying Arab territory," Spain itself is occupying Arab territory.

The tens of thousands of Arabs from Morocco who crossed the border into Spanish-occupied territory did so simply by walking into the region of Ceuta, next door.

Spain has controlled Ceuta since the 17th century. The Spanish claim to the territory is that they’ve been there for a long time.

Morocco counters that Ceuta is physically part of Morocco’s northern coast, while Spain is part of a different continent, twelve miles away and across the Strait of Gibraltar. Spain’s control of Ceuta is a remnant of the era of European colonialism.

By contrast, the territory where Israel is situated has been the Jewish national homeland since biblical times. It has been the core of Judaism itself for more than 3,000 years. The very name “Judea" testifies to the area’s deep Jewish roots.

The name “Ceuta" is the Spanish corruption of the Arabic name for the area, “Sebta," a reminder that Arabs and Berbers (Morocco’s other large ethnic group) were there long before the Spanish conquistadors showed up.

Off the coast of western coast of Morocco, 800 miles to the south, is another Spanish-occupied territory-the Canary Islands. The Spanish occupiers committed mass atrocities against the Guanches and other indigenous peoples when they conquered those islands.

And let’s not forget about the various regions of mainland Spain where local residents are seeking independence, such as the 9 million Catalans in northern Spain, the 3 million Basques in northwest Spain, and the 2.7 million individuals of Celtic heritage in Spain’s Galicia region.

Perhaps the Spanish leaders who often yell about “freeing Palestine" from “Israeli occupation" should take a look in the mirror.

The consistent negligence and recklessness of Chardeie People during Bein Hazmanim

 


by Yehuda Dov

The news clips are laconic, but they reveal a story of consistent negligence, ignorance and shocking indifference to human life.

Today’s news started with a search for a father and his six children who had gone missing in a Negev Wadi. For the uninformed, it should be mentioned that Israel is currently experiencing a heat wave not unlike those in Europe. In many areas, temperatures have crossed 40°C (105°F), and in the northern Negev they are even more extreme. It is more than ill advised to take a hike in such conditions, it borders on lunacy. Within two hours or so the body loses liquids and starts dehydrating, and heat stroke is another possible danger in the blazing desert sun. Nobody can carry the amount of water required to stave off these hazards, and even the IDF prohibits training in such conditions.

Fortunately, after the family failed to show up at the end of their route, the worried mother called rescue teams in and they managed to locate the group, exhausted and dehydrated but alive. 

The next news item, broadcast the same afternoon, revealed a less fortunate outcome, but a similar lack of respect for safety precautions. A 2-year-old toddler at a villa in central Israel had drowned in a pool. This has happened before, but repeats itself far too often. There should be no situation in which a pool is not locked with a high lock if children are around. Parents must know that if the child is anywhere near the pool, and even if they have other young children, they cannot let go of them for even a second. If they cannot control the children, they mustn’t let them into the pool.

The child was taken to hospital in critical condition, but doctors were forced to declare him dead. A 16-year-old boy is also in serious condition after drowning last week, but at least he was in a public pool with a lifesaver, who managed to extricate him before his condition deteriorated further.

The day’s tragedies were not yet over. In the evening it was reported that two young men had overturned in an ATV southeast of Jerusalem. One of them was lightly injured but the other bore the brunt of the accident and was declared dead at the scene. 

The two young men, like the others from the previous items, were charedi, and they join the litany of accidents and mishaps which always seem to befall the community during the Bein Hazmanim period. Even more tragic, the victim in this case, a student at the prestigious Ponovezh yeshiva, was due to get married in the coming weeks.

The real issue here is hubris. People who have never ridden an ATV or only done so on rare occasions have no business riding it out on rugged, steep desert ridges. People who rarely take trips and hikes think that they can consult a map, plan a route and go out in all weathers. People who have only a bathtub to worry about at home rent villas with pools and sometimes rely on an irresponsible older child to take care of his younger sibling.

It is high time that the Torah community, so aware of the value of life and of what can be done with every minute of precious time granted to us by Hashem, makes a concerted campaign to educate people on “V’Nishmartem L’Nafshoseichem”, including all the numerous examples from bitter past experience, and may we set an example for safe vacation activities and not wild, dangerous or extreme pastimes.

Yenuka Loses in Secular Court ...his miracles fall flat!

 

"Justice, justice shall you pursue, that you may live and inherit the land which the Lord your God gives you." (Deuteronomy 16:20).

Today, the judgment was issued in the matter of the request for a restraining order against harassment filed by "Hinuka" against the investigator Israel Friedlis.

The court rejected the petitioners' (Hinuka) claims in full, and ruled that they shall bear the court costs of the respondent in the amount of 3,600 ILS.

Why Did Max Blumenthal go to Iran to Ayatollah’s funeral?????

 



by Laura Loomer

Waaaaaaaa Waaaaaaaa 😭😭😭 somebody call the Wambulance!!!!

Radical leftist and Islamic terrorist sympathizer Max Blumenthal 

@MaxBlumenthal

 is crying over the fact that I reported him to the authorities when he traveled abroad to Iran to attend the Ayatollah’s funeral and then DHS confiscated two of his cell phones when he returned from Iran. 

Max allegedly refused to tell Border Patrol who paid for his trip to Iran, a sanctioned country currently at war with the United States, and he allegedly refused to comply with Border Patrol’s questioning, most likely because telling them the truth about what he was really doing in Iran would likely land Max in serious trouble with law enforcement. 

We don’t need to use our imagination to imagine what Max was doing in Iran. 

If you are supporting enemies of America and may possibly even be violating sanctions, I will monitor you and report you to federal law enforcement. And no, I won’t apologize for doing so either, no matter how much you throw a tantrum and cry about it. 

When you play stupid games, you will win stupid prizes. 


OTD Sings Shabbos Songs With Such Feelings

 

 

 

Some dreams do come through

 

Baghdad was home to one of the oldest Jewish communities and then...............................

 For centuries, Baghdad was home to one of the oldest Jewish communities in the world, a community older than Islam itself. 

Monday, August 3, 2026

Skverer Chutzpah ! Schnooring from the very communities they are trying to destroy!

 



The sheer chutzpah of asking for money from the very Jews New Square considers too problematic to live near, or expose to its children, cannot be ignored.

A fundraising letter from Merkaz Hakollelim Dshikun Square recently arrived in mailboxes throughout the Monsey community.

The appeal describes kollel families struggling “to clothe their children, put food on the table, and cover the huge daily expenses.” With Yom Tov approaching, it asks outside donors to help these families celebrate with dignity.

The need is real. These families deserve help.

But the letter raises an unavoidable question:

There Is Plenty of Money, Just Not for This!

New Square’s leadership has spent years advancing a policy designed to prevent other frum families from settling near the village.

Within the Mile has documented numerous properties connected to that campaign, homes acquired to preserve New Square’s claimed “isolation” and protect its supposed spiritual “purity.”

These are not inexpensive properties.

Consider 6 Durante Court, purchased for $810,000. Article HERE

The property sits directly across the street from a neighborhood shul. Local residents view the purchase not merely as another acquisition within the mile, but as a deliberate attempt to interfere with and disrupt the surrounding Jewish community.

That is one house.

How many struggling families could receive food, clothing and Yom Tov assistance from $810,000? How many children could be properly dressed, refrigerators filled and worried parents given room to breathe?

Instead, the property was purchased across from a shul serving the very community New Square wishes to keep away, and now a fundraising letter is being sent to those same Jews asking them to finance food and clothing inside New Square.

Do Not Blame the Families

The struggling kollel families are not responsible for these priorities.

They should not be shamed, and they should not be left without food or clothing.

The responsibility belongs to the leadership and wealthy supporters who can apparently mobilize extraordinary resources whenever another house becomes available within the mile, but then turn to outsiders when families inside New Square cannot afford basic necessities.

No one is claiming that this particular Yom Tov fund purchased these houses.

The issue is communal priorities. Article HERE

When $810,000 can be found to purchase one property across the street from a neighborhood shul, it is difficult to accept that the surrounding community must then be asked to cover food and clothing, especially while being told that its own families must stay away to protect New Square’s “purity.”

You cannot treat neighboring Jews as a spiritual contamination and then address your fundraising appeal to them as “Dear Friend.”

Return the Envelope to the Ashpa like the dead Sheretz it is!

Anyone receiving this appeal should not simply throw it into the garbage.

Keep the return envelope.

Send it back with a respectful note explaining why you will not participate until New Square changes its priorities.

The note can say:

> I fully support helping families afford food, clothing and Yom Tov necessities. However, New Square-linked buyers continue spending enormous sums purchasing properties around the village as part of the so-called mile policy.

6 Durante Court, located directly across the street from a neighborhood shul, was purchased for $810,000.

Before asking surrounding families for donations, please sell this property, or another property acquired for the mile, and use the proceeds to support your own struggling families.

The same Jews being asked to finance your charitable needs should not simultaneously be treated as too impure to live near you.

Send the envelope back.

Let them see the address. Let them see the purchase price. Let them explain why $810,000 was available to purchase a house across from a shul, while outside donations are needed to provide their own families with food and clothing.

Feed the families. Clothe the children. Sell the houses. *End the mile.*

Why is New Square asking surrounding communities to pay for food and clothing while enormous sums are being spent purchasing houses around the village for the so-called “mile”?



During Viznitz wedding, Chardeim attack The Schatz Rebbe's son because he goes up to the Har Habyis

 

Saudis convinced Trump to stop ‘massive’ weekend attack on Iran

 

Saudi Arabia's de facto leader, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, reached out to President Donald Trump by telephone on Sunday to advocate for "de-escalation and diplomacy," according to a report by the kingdom's official state news outlet, SPA.

SPA reported that the crown prince - frequently referred to as MBS - initiated the discussion with Trump to discuss developments in the region and their regional and international implications."

During the exchange, the Saudi leader "stressed the need to prioritize dialogue to reduce escalation and the importance of making every possible effort to achieve calm that paves the way for diplomatic solutions, preserves the region's security and stability and prevents a wider conflict whose repercussions would affect regional and international security and stability," SPA detailed.

The phone call comes a day after Axios reported that the Saudi Crown Prince held a telephone conversation with Trump to express deep misgivings over potential broad-scale military strikes targeting Iran.

"The Saudis expressed concern and asked for clarity about the plan of action," one US official told Axios.

Some reports suggested that this phone call ultimately contributed to Trump’s decision, announced on Saturday night, to cancel a planned attack on Iran and allow for diplomacy.

He was asked whether there is a deadline for Iran to come to an agreement and said, “We will see. Would I rather make a deal? I am not looking to kill people. Because people die. A lot of people die. We don’t want that."