This vile creature quotes the Chafetz Chayim z"l that supposedly said that "Zionists are Amalike"
The Chafetz Chayim's own son R' Aryeh Leib Kagan was a staunch Zionist, and the Chafetz Chayim knew this very well.
The Chafetz Chayim passed away in 1933, 14 years before the State of Israel was established. Had the State been established in the lifetime of the Chafetz Chayim, millions of Jews would have survived WW2!
I doubt the Chafetz Chayim would say that now if he would see the accomplishments of the Zionists, building the home for the majority of the entire Jewish population in the world!
I know what a lot of you are thinking, why even post this from a self-hating Jew? The answer is that this video went viral around Arab & Muslim social media and it garnered millions of views!
This guy is dangerous!\
ובערת הרע מקרבך
7 comments:
Those Zionists who planned to uproot Torah observance are a form of Amalek. Wouldn't every Gadol agree??
10:28
Would you agree that the big bearded vile scum is "amalek?"
Who uprooted "Torah Observance?"
There are more frum moisdois in the Zionist state than anywhere in the world?
There is more Torah learned in the Zionist State than anywhere in the entire world combined?
So who "Uprooted Torah Observance?'
What are you talking about?
When will they all drop dead? so we won’t have to hear of these filthy traitors anymore
אמן
This guy is a terrible person,
But here is what Chabad Rebbes said
4 sites
Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn (the Rayatz) maintained a firm theological and political stance against the secular Zionist movement, which he articulated in various letters and discourses.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Frierdiger_Rebbe.tif/lossy-page1-250px-Frierdiger_Rebbe.tif.jpg
When a Nazi Officer Saved a Jewish Rebbe: The Rescue of Rabbi ...
Rebbe Yosef Yitzchok Schneersohn | kevarim.com
Here are additional examples and insights into his opposition:
Opposition to "Forcing the End": In Igrot Kodesh (Vol. 4, Letter 106), the Rayatz expressed his refusal to join with the Zionist movement, reiterating that redemption is a divine prerogative, not a political one.
Rejection of Secular Cooperation: He argued that because the movement was led by those who did not follow the Torah, collaboration with them was forbidden, viewing it as a "rebellion" against G-d.
Theological Foundation: Deeply influenced by his father, Rabbi Shalom DovBer (the Rashab), the Rayatz believed that creating a state through human, political efforts violated the sacred nature of the exile and the Three Oaths.
Focus on Yiddishkeit: He prioritized the preservation of Torah and mitzvot in the Diaspora over the creation of a secular, nationalist state, which he felt threatened authentic Jewish life.
To Anonymous 10:28 am
This despicable evil garbage NK baby donkey who kisses with the worst criminals of the Teheran mulla horrific regime is absolutely gur nisht to use or distort or comment the Chofetz Chaim's words in any sense or meaning.
The heilige Chofetz Chaim may have a had a word or two concerning the Zionists of the 1920's and 30's, but the Chofetz Chaim passed away in 1933 (this same year when the Chazon Ish moved from Belarus to Bne Brak) and he did not witness the churban Europa. Therefore NO ONE can talk about what would have been the Chofetz Chaim's position after WW2.
And you asked: "Those Zionists who planned to uproot Torah observance are a form of Amalek. Wouldn't every Gadol agree ?"
The answer is: All the Gedolim, of every shape, size & colour & origin, around the world have declared these micro-sect NK lunatics as totally passul a long time ago, with absolutely no sofek whatsoever.
Chabad was hardly alone, of course, in espousing such sentiments. One can readily appreciate the instinctive incredulity—the almost theological recoil—at the notion that the Ribbono Shel Olam might, in His inscrutable calculus, enlist even the ostensibly secular as instruments of His providential design. And yet, as Rav Kook so memorably articulated, “Bonim ba’chol, ve’achar kach makdishim”. More striking still is the oft-cited observation of the Rav—uttered in a quiet but unmistakable departure from the more reticent posture of the Soloveitchik dynasty—that “history has paskened.” Nu: a psak not rendered in the beis midrash, but inscribed across the unfolding of events themselves.
At the outermost margin of this discourse linger the Neturei Karta, whose ideological fervour far exceeds their practical consequence. Were their influence commensurate with their rhetoric, one might be compelled to invoke the halachic category of rodfim. In reality, however, they resemble little more than a minor abscess—irritating, certainly, but scarcely existential. As with such irritations, obsessive attention only exacerbates the condition; neglect, by contrast, consigns it to the oblivion it so richly deserves.
I agree without a question that Neturei Karta are rodfim!!!
Also of opinion that the zionist state is against the Torah
Post a Comment