“I don’t speak because I have the power to speak; I speak because I don’t have the power to remain silent.” Rav Kook z"l

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Amid Threats, Jewish Blogger Returns to Brandeis

Did Brandeis student Daniel Mael’s right-wing, pro-Israel politics play a role in backlash against him?
Daniel Mael
When Daniel Mael, a 22-year-old Brandeis senior, returned to campus for his final semester last week, he was advised by university police not to walk anywhere alone.

“My lifestyle on campus has to be altered to ensure my safety,” said Mael, a Jewish student originally from Newton, Mass., who met with Brandeis security officials over winter break to discuss details. “We’re still figuring out the specifics.”
These added security precautions were set in motion after an article Mael wrote shortly before winter break sparked outrage among the Brandeis student body and beyond. 
According to Mael, he and his family have received threats of physical violence since.
The article, published on the conservative news website Truth Revolt, criticized fellow Brandeis student Khadijah Lynch’s inflammatory tweets after the funeral of two slain New York police officers.
“I have no sympathy for the nypd officers who were murdered today,” tweeted Lynch, a junior who served in a student leadership position in the African and Afro-American studies department. Lynch has since stepped down from the role and made her previously public twitter account private.
Lynch’s tweets went on to lambast America (“F--- this f---ing country,” read one) and talk about violence (“i need to get my gun license. asap” and “amerikkka needs an intifada. enough is enough”).
As the controversy grew, some students pushed for Lynch to be expelled while others backed her, defending her right to free speech and criticizing Mael for placing her in danger by publicizing her tweets.
In an email to the student body, Michael Piccione, a member of the 2014-15 student conduct board, accused Mael of violating several codes of student conduct and compromising Lynch’s safety by “exposing” her tweets to Mael’s “largely white supremacist following.” He called on the Brandeis community to “condemn the threatening and hateful comments she [Lynch] has received and stand up for the principle of social justice on which Brandeis was founded.”
Piccione also requested a “no contact order” against Mael on Dec. 28, which was briefly put into effect and prevented Mael from being in the same room with Piccione. The order has since been lifted.
Though the immediate heat following the article’s publication has subsided, the incident caused some to speculate that Mael’s staunchly pro-Israel stance played a role in backlash he received from fellow students.
“Mael getting death threats makes sense — he puts himself in the spotlight,” said Rebecca Sternberg, a junior on campus who is on the board of the Brandeis Zionist Alliance, a student group that celebrates the apolitical aspects of Israel, including art and culture.
Though Sternberg sympathizes with Mael’s pro-Israel stance, she disagreed with his “tactics.” “I have less sympathy for Mael than for Khadijah,” she said. “Khadijah didn’t try and put herself in the spotlight, she was forced into it.”
David Eden, chief administrative officer at Hillel International and a veteran editor and columnist, said, “There’s no doubt that as a high-profile Israel activist on campus, Daniel was a target on and off campus.”
Eden, who taught journalism at John Carroll University in Ohio and at the United Arab Emirates University in Abu Dhabi said “Mael did his job as a journalist” and “used his First Amendment rights” to report on a student leader’s controversial public statements. “The larger pro-Israel community has been shocked and amazed by the activity against Mael on campus,” he said.
Daniel Kasdan, a recent Brandeis graduate, said his Facebook newsfeed was “exploding” about the incident over winter break, as Brandeis students weighed in.
Kasdan agreed that Mael is somewhat of a marked man on campus because of his strong conservative standpoints. “Mael is consistently a vocal supporter of conservative causes,” he said. “People who either agree with him politically or find his views objectionable are using this case as a rallying point, either for or against,” he said.
Mael is viewed as a “challenge” to Bradeis’ more “liberal crowd,” said Kasdan. “Mael is viewed as the last refuge for the pro-Israel camp.”
Sternberg agreed that Mael’s proudly conservative viewpoints, most of which are not largely shared by his fellow students, are at the issue’s core. “Brandeis is a super-liberal school, and people will automatically take the liberal side,” she said.
The “liberal side” of the issue became increasingly murky, as articles on free speech and its limitations abounded. In one particularly well-circulated response, Alan Dershowitz, the noted former Harvard Law School professor known for his staunch defense of Israel defended Mael’s freedom of expression.
“So welcome to the topsy-turvy world of the academic hard left, where bigoted speech by fellow hard leftists is protected, but counter-expression is labeled as ‘embarrassment,’ ‘incitement’ and ‘bullying,’” wrote Dershowitz.
Still, even Brandeis students sympathetic with Mael’s viewpoint defended Lynch’s freedom of expression.
“I personally don’t agree with anything Khadijah said but I do think she has the right to express herself,” wrote Rachel Dobkin, a member of the the Brandeis Orthodox Organization, in an online correspondence. “No one agrees with her that I know of, and I think as an institution that values dialogue about important societal issues, it’s revolting that people wanted her expelled.”
Another Jewish student, who requested anonymity because he was “scared Daniel will come after me next,” said that Mael’s “polarizing” positions have driven a wedge between different segments of the Jewish community on campus.
“He’s created two camps,” he said, the “J Street folks,” a reference to the dovish pro-Israel lobby group, “and the Hillel folks,” The student, a junior, said he’s “personally intrigued” by J Street’s mission, but afraid to get more involved lest his friends at Hillel feel “betrayed.”
“I feel very guilty about not taking a public stand for Daniel, but he keeps antagonizing people,” he said.
To be sure, Mael is no stranger to taking a public stance against another student. On Jan. 2, the Wall Street Journal published an article headlined “How to Fight the Campus Speech Police: Get a Good Lawyer” detailing Mael’s yearlong dispute with Eli Philip, the head of Brandeis J Street U, the organization’s campus arm. The article describes how Mael hired a lawyer to defend himself against harassment claims brought against him by Philip.
J Street officials declined to comment on the incident. They also declined to comment on the Lynch incident. Philip declined to comment as well.
Mael was also involved in a kerfuffle with Brandeis J Street U board member Talia Lepson, who Mael accused of verbally harassing him. According to Mael, Lepson responded to his “Shabbat shalom” with “Jews hate you.” Mael reported the case to university police. Though the case went no further, there was a sprinkling of media coverage. 
“These repeated incidents make Brandeis look really bad, and students resent that,” said Sarah, a Brandeis senior who preferred only to use her first name to avoid getting involved in the politics of the situation. Sarah, who is an actively pro-Israel student on campus, said she feels that Brandeis is a “comfortable place” to be an Israel supporter.
Andrew Flagel, senior vice president for students and enrollment at Brandeis, encouraged further dialogue, which he called “the best disinfectant.” He added that “Brandeis welcomes its students to express different viewpoints, even those with which people radically disagree.”
Regarding the “no contact order” briefly issued against Mael, Flagel said, “It’s not unusual to ask students for timeouts in communication with one another.”
Still, after all that has happened, Mael feels abandoned by his fellow students.
“I’m deeply disappointed by the reaction of the Brandeis community,” said Mael, who chose to attend Brandeis because his grandfather had been a member of the 1955 graduating class. “Some students have reached out to me privately with support. Some even made fake email accounts to communicate with me. The intimidation that many students feel on their college campus is chilling.”
Tal Fortgang, a sophomore at Princeton University, sympathizes deeply with Mael. He encountered a similarly overwhelming response when his article, “Checking My Privilege,” went viral last year. In the article Fortgang, the grandchild of Holocaust survivors, defended his perceived “privilege” as a well-educated white male, attributing his opportunities to the sacrifices of his grandparents. The piece, which touched upon “firebrand racial issues,” incited high emotions. The article was even called “an act of violence” by some students, Fortgang said.
“Daniel is going through what I went through, only a far more severe and prolonged version,” said Fortgang, who is originally from New Rochelle. “There is no accounting for people not rushing to his defense.”
Still, even from an outsider’s perspective, Fortgang agreed that there is more to the situation than meets the eye.
“Daniel’s hawkish, unwavering support of Israel is not tangential in this case. There is a strange alliance between certain political views and other causes,” he said. “Clearly Daniel is a man of great integrity. I hope he stands strong.”

Chairwoman Of New Party For Female Charedim, Says Charedi Women In Position Of ‘Slavery’

Kol hakovod to Geveret Kolian for having the courage to speak out for the hundreds of thousands of Chareidi women who really have no voice in the government of EY. 

Their husbands mindlessly vote like sheeplach as directed by some Rebbe so they are further disenfranchised. 
Hopefully, over the longer term, they will elicit sufficient votes to get some traction in the Knesset and representation in key ministries. 
In the interim, simply speaking out as they have done is a big Kiddush hashem and will empower more women over time to ask questions, challenge the status quo and seek to move into the the political mainstream. 
Hopefully, they will run over and squash anyone who suggests they should stay at home in the kitchen with the kids and allow their husbands to represent them.
If Hareidi woman are expected to take a greater role to financially support their husbands then this is the natural outgrowth.
The chairwoman of the new U’Vezechutan party Ruth Kolian launched to provide haredi women with Knesset representation described the situation of haredi women in the country as akin to slavery and said that the need for female haredi MKs was overwhelming.
Speaking to The Jerusalem Post, Kolian, who is 33 and married with four children, outlined the reasons why she was starting a new political party to represent haredi women.
“There are a vast number of different population sectors who have representation in the Knesset, Arabs, Jews, Sephardim, Ashkenazim, haredim and so on,” she said.
“But haredi women have no representation at all. There are male haredi representatives but they do not address the needs and concerns of haredi women,” she continued.
Kolian noted that the Knesset Committee for the Advancement of the Status of Women had held a hearing in November to discuss worrying findings about women’s health in the haredi sector, including a thirty percent higher rate of breast cancer mortality and that haredi women have one of the lowest levels of life expectancy in the country.
“Not one of the haredi MKs showed up to the hearing,” said Kolian. “Haredi women are ranked eighth in Israel for life expectancy, while haredi men are ranked second. This is an unbelievable gap,” she continued.
“The burden and division of labor within a haredi family is completely lop-sided. Women have to bring in an income to support the family financially, take care of the children, cook, and perform other family requirements. Some men are now working but many still go to study all day and this burden on women has a toll.”
Kolian also said that the social stigmatism attached to being a divorced, single woman in haredi society was so intense that many haredi women would not even contemplate filing for divorce from an unpleasant marriage or an abusive husband unless they were in a life-threatening situation.
“Single divorced women are seen as shameful in the haredi community, they are seen as being failures, as not being good enough, and so many choose to suffer in silence,” she said.
“Politicians are talking today about the weaker sectors of society and the invisible people. Well we are slaves, we are invisible, we are the weaker sector. Haredi women are a group of people together and we need to gain Knesset representation as a people and take care of ourselves by ourselves.”
Kolian said her new U’Vezechutan party would also seek to provide representation to members of the haredi community who have left full-time yeshiva study and are joined the workforce, saying that this haredi sub-sector also has no Knesset representation.
She noted that prior to establishing and launching U’Vezechutan she approached the two mainstream haredi parties Shas and United Torah Judaism asking for slots on their electoral lists to be reserved for women but the requests were denied.
Kolian was also part of a group of women who submitted a petition to the Central Elections Committee chaired by Supreme Court Justice Salim Joubran which demanded that Shas, UTJ and the new Yachad Ha’am Itanu party established by former Shas MK Eli Yishai be required to include at least one woman on their respective electoral lists.
The petition was denied with Jourban writing that the committee did not have the authority to intervene in the affairs of political parties and their chosen candidates.
Despite the problems facing haredi women, U’Vezechutan’s chances of entering the Knesset are slim given the way in which the haredi public, including the women, largely adhere to the instructions of the leading rabbis and vote for the established parties, Shas and UTJ.
Kolian was more reticent when discussing her own societal background and place within haredi society, but insisted that her and her new party are representative of mainstream haredi women.
She pointed out that she sends her children to “Talmudei Torah,” haredi elementary schools, often a barometer of a person’s commitment to a haredi lifestyle, although there are a range of such institutions, some of which would be considered to be outside of the haredi mainstream, especially if they teach core curriculum subjects.
Kolian has herself taken a public role and is active on Facebook, both of which are unusual for haredi women, while her husband works full-time, when the oft-espoused ideal for men in haredi society is to study full time in yeshiva.
Kolian said she rejected such yard-sticks for defining her haredi identity, arguing that “to be haredi is to have fear of Heaven,” and said that the length of one’s skirt and internet usage were not relevant to her place in haredi society.
“I’m not prepared to allow this kind of platform to determine what a haredi woman can be. Haredi women do not have to be confined to the role of a kindergarten teacher who goes home only to take care of her own children as well,” she said.
“There are haredi women who will hear what we have to say and will see that for the first time there is someone who is attentive to and understand them.
“The haredi woman is alone at the voting booth,” Kolian said in reference to the strong influence rabbinic declarations about the importance of voting for the established haredi parties have on the haredi public.
“The community is becoming more aware of this cynical use and manipulation of our great rabbis and will come to understand that something really smells bad with this kind of political model.”

Frum Police Officer resigns because his fellow officers called him a "dirty Jew"

David Attali claims fellow cops vandalized his locker with hate-filled messages, greeted him with 'Heil Hitler' salute and called him 'dirty Jew.'


AN EX-NYPD cop claims he was subjected to such virulent attacks on his Jewish faith by fellow cops at the World Trade Center police command that he resigned from the force, the Daily News has learned.
That the police station is located on hallowed ground where more than 2,000 people were killed in the 9/11 attack apparently did not deter the cops who allegedly vandalized David Attali’s locker with hate-filled messages, greeted him with a “Heil Hitler” salute and called him a host of anti-Semitic slurs including “dirty Jew.”
“Everybody messes around but these guys were out of control,” Attali told The News Tuesday in an exclusive interview. “The World Trade Center is someplace special, sacred, it’s American history. But it didn’t seem to affect these people.”
Attali, 31, is suing the city and five cops involved in the denigration that he says included sending him text messages containing the slurs and even a photo of Adolf Hitler. He is also suing four supervisors for refusing his request for a transfer and allowing the hostilities to continue.
The six-year veteran reported the harassment to the NYPD Office of Equal Employment Opportunity last May, but Attali did not disclose to investigators that he had copies of text messages and secretly recorded audio to back up his claims.
Attali said he was hoping the sight of his locker plastered with supermarket advertisements for pork products, a newspaper headline that read: “Hail Hitler” and a swastika carved in a sticker would have been sufficient grounds to approve a transfer — but he was wrong. “He wasn’t looking to get anyone in trouble but he was drowning ... and he had to get out of there,” said Attali’s lawyer Rocco Avallone.
Unable to deal with the further stress of being shunned and harassed, Attali resigned in August. Several months after he left, Attali was informed that EEO had confirmed that his locker was vandalized but the allegations of verbal harassment were unsubstantiated apparently because the cops denied it, according to Avallone.
Deputy Chief Kim Royster, an NYPD spokeswoman, said the investigations are confidential.
Today, the Brooklyn-born Orthodox Jew, who has dual citizenship in the U.S. and Israel, works as a driver for a company that inspects water meters.
The harassment, he said, may have been motivated in part to his being given Saturdays off to observe the Jewish Sabbath.
In early 2013, a handwritten note was attached to Attali’s locker stating, “This sign is covered with bacon grease. If anyone touches it he will go straight to hell,” according to the lawsuit filed in Manhattan Federal Court.
Attali said he confided only in his wife. His wife, whose grandfather died in a concentration camp, was appalled by what she heard.
Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association lawyer Steve Worth, who represented the accused cops during the EEO investigation, said Attari made it clear he wanted off the job. “The way he did it was to bring false claims against these officers and to bring a lawsuit to get money on the way out the door,” Worth said. 

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Boycott Borsalino Hats Over Rising Costs

Ok, I think we should start wearing baseball caps, with the insignia of the respective yeshivos...
so if your a Telzer, the cap should have a large "T" and so on....

The following is via COL:
Will the boycott travel across the Atlantic?
A group of Chabad bochurim in New York are trying to garner support to join a boycott that originated in Israel over the rising prices of fedora hats


Organizers are saying that prices of the Italian made Borsalino hats have risen by $50 in the last 5 years, bringing the price of the typical Yeshiva student’s hat in Israel to $274.
Petitions going around in Yeshivas in Jerusalem and Bnei Brak are threatening to stop purchasing hats if the prices don’t drop. According to Makor Rishon newspaper, some 10,000 people signed.
“Borsalino is telling us that it’s a luxury item and the price doesn’t have to be cheap, but they know the truth – that everyone still buys it, not only a select few,” one organizer said.
“It’s a common product and there is no reason the price should be so high,” the person added. “A manufacturer raises prices to increase profits on a product that isn’t selling well, but if the masses are buying this excuse doesn’t exist.”
Regular consumers of the hats made of felt from Belgian rabbit are Lubavitcher chassidim, and students of Litvish and Sephardic Yeshivos. Other chassidic groups wear hats with beaver finish or a fur shtreimel.
Recently, bochurim in a Chabad Yeshiva in New York have asked their ‘hanhala’ administration if they would be allowed to join the boycott and start wearing a flat cap, also called a casket hat.

Eida Chareidis to French Jews: Don’t Come on Aliya


If this is in fact true, and all indications are that it is, all Jews should stop buying any products from the Badatz!
If this is true, then these so called Rabbonim are, as the Satmar Rebbe, Reb Yoel Teitelbaum put it ..."Meenin and Apikorsim"
How low can a Jew go? I guess, very very low! 

In a pashkavil released by the Badatz Eida Chareidis addressed to Jews of the Diaspora, the beis din calls on Jews of France and Europe not to permit themselves to believe statements from state officials to come on aliyah due to the recent wave of terrorism in France and the fear of additional attacks.

The badatz mourns the murdered Jews but advises European Jews not to move to Israel for as long as they do not know with certainty where their children will be attending school but to remain in France and continue their Torah observant lifestyle.

The badatz warns by citing what occurred in the past to other communities that came to Israel and lost their Yiddishkheit as a result.

Jewish Doctor Murdered in Hospital in Boston

Dr. Michael Davidson z"l
This Oct. 24, 2006 photo provided by Mainframe Photographics, shows Michael J. Davidson, director of endovascular cardiac surgery at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, who died late Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2015, after being shot inside the hospital earlier that day.  AP
Administrators and staff at a leading Boston hospital are mourning the death of a cardiac surgeon who was fatally shot at the hospital by a man who then killed himself.
Officials at Brigham and Women’s Hospital said Dr. Michael J. Davidson, director of endovascular cardiac surgery, died late Tuesday after being shot around 11 a.m.
“Dr. Davidson was a wonderful and inspiring cardiac surgeon who devoted his career to saving lives and improving the quality of life of every patient he cared for,” said a statement issued by the hospital, which is affiliated with Harvard Medical School. “It is truly devastating that his own life was taken in this horrible manner.”
Hospital officials said Wednesday they planned to lower a flag outside the hospital to half-staff in honor of Davidson.
Police said Stephen Pasceri, 55, entered the hospital Tuesday morning and specifically requested the doctor.
Pasceri, of Millbury, shot the doctor twice just outside an examination room on the second floor of the Carl J. and Ruth Shapiro Cardiovascular Center; he then turned the gun on himself, police said.
Boston Police Commissioner William Evans said officers conducting a room-by-room search found the gunman dead in an exam room with the weapon.
Police said Pasceri wasn’t a patient of the doctor’s and they didn’t specify a motive for the shootings.
Boston Mayor Martin J. Walsh said he was “deeply saddened” by Davidson’s death. “This tragedy is the result of a senseless act of violence that has no place in our City,” he said in a statement early Wednesday.
Evans said earlier Tuesday that police were talking to witnesses, “but it’s leading us to believe there was something in the past that upset this guy, that made him go in and look for this particular doctor.”
Police and hospital officials commended the fast response by police and hospital staff, who they said had been trained to respond to an “active shooter” situation.
Evans said police were on the scene within seconds after getting the first calls of shots fired and had the area secured within 15 minutes.
Betsy Nabel, the hospital’s president, said Brigham and Women’s will evaluate its safety protocols. She said there have been no discussions about installing metal detectors, which none of the city’s hospitals have.

MK Gafne: There is No Such Thing as a ‘Working Chareidi’

Der Chuchem Fin De Ma Nishtana, MK Gafe
That's it guys..... the regular working zhlub that is either a professional or a blue collar worker, gets up at 5:30 in the morning to learn the daf, davens, then grabs his coffee running to work, comes home exhausted from a full day's work, steals a supper, runs to say hi to his kids, and runs out the door to chap a shiur, comes home, speaks to his wife for 15 minutes and falls asleep, "IS NOT A CHAREIDIE!" even if he is a shomer torah u'mitzvos!

But the guy who gets up at 8:00AM and walks calmly to shul, comes home to hearty hot breakfast, then walks to Kollel, comes home for a hot lunch, grabs an afternoon nap, and then goes slowly back to Kollel, then walks home to a hot supper, and then chaps a shmooze with all his children...then goes to Maariv and looks into a sefer, comes home and goes to sleep, and who has never worked a day in his entire life...."HE IS A CHAREIDIE!"


Speaking with Mordechai Lavi of Kol Berama Radio on Tuesday morning 29 Teves, MK Moshe Gafne explained from his perspective there is no such thing as ‘working chareidi’.

Following is excerpts from the radio interview which lasted over 20 minutes.

Gafne
I do not accept the categorization. There are those who opt to leave yeshiva and join the working community.

KB
Are they called chareidim?

Gafne
No they are no. I do not accept this. It does not exist. One who does not learn in kollel and works has left.

KB
Is it true that at times children are discriminated against due to their ethnicity?

Gafne
I tell you now as in the past this is simply not true. There are children who are not accepted for one reason or another. Sometimes because the parents work, at times other reasons. There are many. Now we are speaking about something else.
One can go to work and that is fine but they are not the same as those immersed in limud. By the way, to my sorrow, I too am working and it is not the same.

KB
Yes but your children are accepted.

Gafne
Please, we are not speaking about this. I know there is a person who turned to me about this. I know what you are talking about…In the time of the Chassam Sofer there were those who worked and those who did not but the difference is they all adhered to his word, unlike today…
I do not accept the category. There is no such thing as working chareidim and I do not need an asifa. This is the fact.

KB
But these people do not know who to vote for? Who represents them?
Gafne elaborates how he dedicates a great deal of his time to work with mosdos and Chinuch Atzmai and to address issues of students being accepted and rejected in schools. This he insists is all the time and not just now, before elections. I have my record that speaks for itself and I do not need elections to make the point.

KB
Can you admit there is a group that feels Yahadut Hatorah is now their home, that you do not represent them? Perhaps the people Aryeh Deri and Eli Yishai are working to enlist?

Gafne
It is not a “group”. There is no group like this. They are trying to drum up votes. I cannot speak for them. I know we cannot compete with one another or worse, than one will not pass the minimum threshold and the votes will be wasted. Those evil people with their gezeiros did not differentiate between us and we should not differentiate between one another.

KB
What is a working chareidi? One who wears a shirt that is not totally white? What is he called?

Gafne
Finally we get to it. Anyone who adheres to Torah and rabbonim and wants his children educated as they should I will work to assist him. I do not understand from shirts. I deal with the person, not clothing.
Honestly, I do not look at one’s clothing but I look at the person. It is possibly competition between mosdos.

KB
Rav Gafne you are avoiding the issue. Is there such a thing as working chareidim?

Gafne
No there is not. There are chareidim who adhere to gedolei yisrael. That is it.

KB
Have you visited the Kiryat Ono Chareidi College?

Gafne
No. It is not my job. My job is to concern myself with the needs of lomdei Torah and that is it. One wishing to attend a chareidi college may but it is not my job. I do not represent academics.

KB
That is exactly the point. That is what they say. You and Yahadut Hatorah does not represent them. Don’t you understand this is how they feel? They are looking for representation.

Gafne
From my perspective I represent them too but not regarding academics

KB
No you do not and that is where we started. They are without representation

Gafne
They must consult with their rav, the same rabbonim who permitted them to attend a college, even a chareidi one. We have to worry about the lomdei Torah for that is our goal and our future. I do not encourage academics and it is not my job. The thousands in these colleges do turn to me and I do my best to assist them.
Let one person come off the air and tell me he came to me and I refused to assist him.

KB
I have him on the air. Are you willing to debate him?

Gafne
No.

KB
What scares you so much? I do not understand.

Gafne
For me it is ideology. It has not and will not change no matter how good they are. I am here for lomdei Torah, not academics. Since the lomdei Torah keep us all going and they are targeted [by the government] it is my job to assist them, no one else. Anyone who approaches me as an individual that I can assist I have and will always continue doing what I can to assist.
There are many including person close to me that shifted to academics but that is not what I do.

KB
What about “chardakim”?

Gafne
Please, I told you I do not know about all these titles. I follow what I was taught by Maran HaRav Shach and do my best to assist anyone and everyone that comes to me.

KB
I never heard you stutter like today. I have rachmanus on you. You are in an untenable situation. Perhaps it is time to reconsider and look at the generation and it is time to change things around

Gafne
You can say what you need to and I will respond as I do. Thanks for having rachmanus and I need it for certain due to the load. However there is nothing to change, not even one millimeter. This is what it is and will continue to do. This is our job and our responsibility. Hence, I have rachmanus on you that you thought Gafne will say different things on the air and I disappointed you.

KB
You believe it works like that?

Gafne
No but you have rachmanus on me so I return it.

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

ISIS executes 13 teens for watching soccer


ISIS jihadists publicly executed 13 teenage boys for watching a soccer match.
The young fans were watching an Asian Cup match between Iraq and Jordan on TV last week when they were caught by the militants in the Iraqi city of Mosul, which the Islamic State controls, the Daily Mail reported.
Raqqa Is Being Slaughtered Silently, an activist group that exposes ISIS atrocities, reported that the teens were executed by a firing squad.
“The bodies remained lying in the open and their parents were unable to withdraw them for fear of murder by terrorist organisation,” the group posted on its website.
The boys were slaughtered because they were said to be violating Sharia laws by watching the game.
A few days earlier, the Islamic State released a gruesome video showing two men being flung off a tower in Mosul after a masked fighter announced that they had been found guilty of engaging in homosexual activities.
Iraq beat Jordan 1-0 in the Jan. 12 match, which took place in Brisbane, Australia.

Why the movie about Martin Luther King removed all traces of Jews in "Selma"

There is a new movie out there about the life of Martin Luther King ....called "Selma"
When Martin Luther King marched on Selma,..... just two feet away from him was Rabbi Joshua Heschel, marching with him, but you wouldn't know it watching this movie!

They also twisted and re-wrote the true history between the relationship of LBJ and King. Those of us that were alive during the Civil Rights Movement will remember that the one who was in the fore-front of this movement was the President at that time, Lyndon B. Johnson, and King had a great relationship with LBJ, but you wouldn't know it watching the movie....

But Blacks are miffed that it didn't get nominated for an Academy Award..even though the movie is not related in anyway to the truth, and was the figment of the Director's imagination.

So, I'm sure, you're all thinking, "why does  DIN care?" 
I do care because by in large the audience of this movie will be blacks, and if the Director would have stuck to the facts, more blacks would have seen that it was the Jews that were fighting for them to get equal rights, and maybe, just maybe, we would be able to begin to turn around some of this black hatred against Jews!
But the Director who is anti-White and anti-Jews had a different agenda and now she is reaping what she sowed....
a movie that will be thrown into the dustbins of history and will soon be forgotten! 

Monday, January 19, 2015

Martin Luther King Day

Leaders in a Vietnam war protest stand in silent prayer in Arlington National Cemetery, Feb. 6, 1968. Front row, from left: Rev. Andrew Young, executive vice president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference; Bishop James P. Shannon, Roman Catholic auxiliary bishop of Minneapolis and St. Paul; Rabbi Abraham Heschel, professor at the Jewish Theological Seminary, New York; the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and Rabbi Maurice Eisendrath, president of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations. The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and Arlington Amphitheater are in

Half a century after Dr. King walked arm-in-arm with rabbis to demand racial equality, his movement’s legacy ignites the activism of American Jews on both ends of the Israel spectrum, pitting ardent Zionists against Jews who beg to differ with King’s 1968 assessment of Israel as “one of the great outposts of democracy in the world, and a marvelous example of what can be done.”

King once told someone who was an anti-Zionist
": "Don't talk like that. When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You're talking anti-Semitism"