The house is quiet. I’m about to go to bed. I watch Aharon Feldman warn the public about Efraim Palvanov. Everyone asleep. Dishwasher humming. The kind of hour when doctrines loosen and truth sits down beside you.
The Rav spoke with confidence. Absolute confidence. The kind that comes from a world where the internal logic is so complete, there’s no need to look beyond it.
"Palvanov denies Torah sheb’al peh. Undermines Mesorah. Misreads Rambam. Treats halacha like a buffet." His presentations are “in color,” which somehow makes them suspect.
I wait for an actual argument:
why the archaeology is wrong, why textual history is irrelevant, how halacha is both human-shaped and also fixed at Sinai.
Nothing. Just certainty. Thick, immovable certainty.
Something in me tightens - the same tightening I feel in shul when a baal koreh slips on a vowel, and the room jolts like the universe tore at the seam.
He’s talking to anyone who might look at the past without the filters.
Anyone who quietly wondered why Egyptian artifacts look uncomfortably familiar. Or why Rambam contradicts the Gemara. Or why halacha reads less like a straight Sinai-to-today transmission and more like a centuries-long group project where half the contributors never met each other.
Anyone who opened a sefer in the back of shul and felt the floor tilt: the transmission of the Bible isn’t clean. The scrolls we lift aren’t the ones our ancestors held. The whole thing is human all the way down.
Anyone who learned to perform belief flawlessly while privately knowing they don’t believe it.
His video isn’t about sources. It’s about guarding the wall.
The wall that protects a world where questioning Torah sheb’al peh is unthinkable. Where archaeology is “meaningless” by definition if it contradicts Mesorah. Where historical texts don’t get to speak for themselves because listening to them might loosen the story that holds everything together.
His premise rests on a simple axiom:
We already know the truth.
Anything that doesn’t align with it is dangerous.
If I still lived inside that world, I’d probably agree.
Because the way you live inside that world is by accepting one foundational premise as fact, as a law of nature: God gave us the Torah on Sinai, and everything in the Torah is absolutely true.
That’s not a conclusion you arrive at through evidence.
That’s the prior.
You don’t argue someone out of a prior. You can’t. Because every argument you make gets processed through that same lens. Archaeological evidence? Filtered. Textual history? Filtered. Contradictions in the Gemara? Filtered.
The prior isn’t the conclusion. It’s the operating system.
And once you’re running on that operating system, Rav Feldman’s video makes perfect sense. Of course Palvanov is dangerous. Of course his sources are worthless. Of course looking at Egyptian artifacts is a distraction. Not because the Rav examined the evidence and found it lacking - but because the evidence was never going to matter in the first place.
The prior already told you the answer.
But I don’t live inside that world anymore.
I live in a world where the question “Why did he choose the Rambam?” is less interesting than the fear embedded inside it: If you look too closely, the seams show.
And once you see the seams, you can’t unsee them.
So Rav Feldman says: don’t listen. Don’t watch. Don’t let the questions in.
He’s not afraid of Efraim Palvanov.
He’s afraid of oxygen.
People like us aren’t trying to break halacha. We’re not trying to destroy Mesorah or convince anyone of anything.
We’re trying to live honestly in a world that only speaks certainty. Trying to understand the system that formed us after we stepped outside it.
There’s no category for that.
So if he wants a line in the sand, fine. But name it accurately:
Not Torah vs heresy. Not Mesorah vs ignorance.
Certainty vs curiosity.
Closed worlds vs open ones.
Some of us grew up believing the world was a stage and Torah sheb’al peh was the director. Then one day we saw the lights. The sets. The microphones. The ropes holding everything in place.
The illusion didn’t become less beautiful. It just became visible.
And once you’ve seen the ropes, you can’t pretend they’re mountains.
***
This is the thing.
The thing that’s been driving me insane. The part that makes me want to tear my hair out because there are barely words for it.
The blindness.
Not the kind where you can’t see - the kind where you refuse to. Where the prior does all the work. Where certainty becomes the blindfold and calls itself clarity.
This video clip is blindness, fully embodied.
Here it is.
Look at it.
See it for what it is.
You can’t hide from it now. You can’t pretend it’s something noble or protective or traditional.
It’s a man telling you not to look.
And calling that wisdom.
4 comments:
You know what's sad?
Back in the heyday of the Jewish blogs, there was a famous one called "Letter to my rabbi", ostensibly written by a guy who became a BT through Aish but then started questioning the simplistic and dogmatic answers he was given to difficult questions about how to reconcile history with Biblical accounts or how to understand certain laws today. And so he left Torah when he was essentially told "Our answers are the only true answers and you have to accept them to be a Torah Jew". Only he couldn't and so he didn't.
Yet going through that essay, one could fine Torah-authentic sources to answer all his questions in a suitable way, from various mephorshim to modern authors knowledgeable in science and history. The responses and invitation to deep discussions were all there but Aish apparently skipped them.
And R' Feldman? This is just his "Silffkin is evil and you should ignore everything he says!" speech with a different name attached. it's the "It's out way or you're an apikorus" approach that prefers large numbers of people leave Torah as long as everyone who stays behind blindly believes what they're told.
Garnel’s simplistic upteitch is also riddled with inaccuracies. Aish itself is not normative Orthodox Judaism. A gadol was intending to take them down but passed away before he could act. There are many weird psakim from Aish that no one agrees with that are not compatible with kiruv & Torah hashkofa (not just them harboring pedophile Matis Weinberg who is wanted by California authorities). The Slifkin affair was engineered & executed by kovod zucher career criminal Leib Pinter who is known as the “Energizer Ganiv”. There were gedolim who didn’t fall for it & did not sign. Slifkin still has issues, he is very arrogant & combative. Rav Sternbuch said he is a case where it’s possible for certain hashkofos to be heretical views without it making the person a heretic personally (in this case because Slifkin mistakenly ‘thinks’ he can pick whatever daas yechidim in Rishonim that he wants)
Don't Confuse Me With the Facts 6:58
Yours is the typical response from "plotchik" Yeshivishe outlook on the rest of Yiddishkeit that don't exactly fit in their narrow agenda! Your outlook is that only you and your cronies stood at Har Sinai!
Going with your Yeshivishe logic, I'll suggest that Hashem took down that "godol" before he can make any damage to Klall Yisrael!
Most of Charedie Psakim many would consider "weird" !
I agree with your assessment of Slifkin but then you add "
Slifkin mistakenly thinks’ he can pick whatever daas yechidim in Rishonim that he wants"
Well. that's exactly what the Satmar Rebbe did as well in his Vayoel Moshe when he goes with the opinion Rav Chaim of the Baalei Tosfos vis-a vis Yishuv Eretz Yisrael, which all Rishonim say is a Daas Yachid! etc
Everyone will take daas yechidim when it fits their agenda!
There is nothing that Slifkin said that the Ramban didn't say 1,000 years ago!
Don't Confuse Me With the Facts 6:58
Yours is the typical response from "plotchik" Yeshivishe outlook on the rest of Yiddishkeit that don't exactly fit in their narrow agenda! Your outlook is that only you and your cronies stood at Har Sinai!
Going with your Yeshivishe logic, I'll suggest that Hashem took down that "godol" before he can make any damage to Klall Yisrael!
Most of Charedie Psakim many would consider "weird" !
I agree with your assessment of Slifkin but then you add "
Slifkin mistakenly thinks’ he can pick whatever daas yechidim in Rishonim that he wants"
Well. that's exactly what the Satmar Rebbe did as well in his Vayoel Moshe when he goes with the opinion Rav Chaim of the Baalei Tosfos vis-a vis Yishuv Eretz Yisrael, which all Rishonim say is a Daas Yachid! etc
Everyone will take daas yechidim when it fits their agenda!
There is nothing that Slifkin said that the Ramban didn't say 1,000 years ago!
Post a Comment