Many of the Dead Sea Scrolls are much older than academics previously thought, with some dating back to the time of their ancient authorship, a new study claims.
Scientists from the University of Groningen in the Netherlands utilized artificial intelligence to examine the handwriting of the ancient fragments and claim they derived more accurate dates for some writings, including the Book of Daniel, according to a paper published in Plos One.
The aptly named AI program “Enoch” was fed a plethora of already dated ancient texts from modern-day Israel and the West Bank that also had radiocarbon dates — then used machine learning to study the handwriting progressions of 135 Dead Sea Scroll fragments.
The study claimed that the fragment of the Book of Daniel 8-11, which was thought to be dated to 160s BC, could be as old as 230 BC, which overlaps with the period in which the biblical book was authored.
“With the Enoch tool we have opened a new door into the ancient world, like a time machine, that allows us to study the hands that wrote the Bible,” the study’s authors wrote in a statement, Eureka Alert reported.
“Especially now that we have established, for the first time, that two biblical scroll fragments come from the time of their presumed authors,” the statement continued.
Researchers also claim that fragments written in Herodian Aramaic and Hasmonaean Hebrew — considered to have emerged in the First and Second centuries BC — are actually older than initially thought and provide a new lens for the presumed proliferation of writing during that era.
These new dating claims result in “a new chronology of the scrolls and the re-dating of ancient Jewish key texts that contribute to current debates on Jewish and Christian origins,” the study stated.
The Dead Sea Scrolls were first discovered in 1943 by two Bedouin shepherds who found them secreted in caves in the Qumran section of Israel near the Dead Sea and are the oldest known fragments of Jewish manuscripts written in Hebrew, Greek, Arabic and Aramaic dating back to the Third and Second century BC.
Scholars attribute the trove of religious manuscripts to the Essens, who were Jewish sectarians at the turn of the first millennium.
One would think that this error would inspire a little humility and these same scholars could find it within themselves to acknowledge that they may also be wrong about the date of authorship. It is, after all, written in first person by a person who lived long before 230 BC. I find the hubris fascinating.
ReplyDeleteTremendous work goes into accurately dating these works and restoring them to the point of legibility. We should have a little humilty out of respect for the training and patient efforts of these scholars.
ReplyDeleteThe one down side of these scrolls is how they're used by non-believers. These are not official documents. They're crib notes and random religious observations but the minute they contradict the Torah, which should surprise nobody, peple oint out "You see! The Torah wasn't a real document until only a couple of 1000 years ago!"
Agreed. I can respect their training and efforts. Just not the hubris.
Delete