There are different areas of Har Habais, some of which can be entered even betuma, according to Halacha. Obviously, ascending Har Habais requires perfect knowledge of what’s mutar and what’s osur, but there are many other areas in Halacha, such as hilchos Shabos and taharas hamishpocha for example, where isur koreis is at stake. The proper approach is to actually learn the sugya and become knowledgeable of the actual dinim. If you are too lazy or too stupid to learn the real halachos, at least don’t be proud of your amoratzus by saying that everything is prohibited.
To all the “masters” of political science:
you cannot “provoke” the islamonazis any more than your very existence as a Jew already “provokes” these savages. No, controlling our holy places will not make the rabid dogs hate us more, as they already hate us at the maximum level, and they will try to attack us no matter what we do or don’t do. However, don’t forget that it is only H’ that controls the world, as opposed to the political “cheshbonos”, and it definitely brings kitrug in shamaim when fools such as you are perfectly fine with the Chilul H’ of the islamonazi savages trampling mekom kodesh hakedoshim, in an ostensibly Jewish state with an ostensibly Jewish army nonetheless! If the medina was a truly Jewish state, they would have actually accepted the gift that H’ presented to us in 1967, demolished the islamonazi structures on Har Habais, had rabanut fence off no-go areas and control the proper behavior and dress code for the visitors. Arabs themselves were preparing for the demolition in 1967, and even had each stone of their structures numbered in order to facilitate putting it up elsewhere, but the evil Judenrat elites immediately gave away Har Habais to the islamonazis, which paradoxically not only failed in making the islamonazis like us, but actually made them hate us even more.
Here is a letter from the Rambam detailing his going up to the Har Habyis
In a landmark ruling which immediately sent shock waves through Israel’s political establishment, a Jerusalem Magistrates Court judge ruled that Jews are entitled to say prayers including Shema and prostrate themselves on Temple Mount, despite the fact that such practices have resulted in arrests and evictions from the precinct in the past.
The dramatic decision came after an appeal was made against the arrest of three youths who had prostrated themselves and said Kriyas Shema while on the Temple Mount.
The youths were arrested by police and given a 15-day restraining order preventing them from entering the Old City of Jerusalem. Police claimed that the youths’ behavior could lead to a violation of public order.
Judge Tziyon Saharai of the Magistrates Court cancelled the police restrictions and wrote that “I believe that one cannot say that prostrating and saying Kriyat Shema can be suspected of being behaviors which violate public order. It is hard to accept a situation in which saying Shema Yisrael on Temple Mount could be deemed a criminal act and one that could bring a violation of the peace.”
The judge quoted Police Commissioner Kobi Shabtai who said last month that “Temple Mount is open. Police allow all residents of the state and of Judea and Samaria to pray there and to perform their religious services.”
The judge wrote that this statement clearly stresses that all residents of the state may ascend Temple Mount and perform the rites of their religions and therefore “the behavior of the petitioners was in accordance with the public proclamation of the Police Commissioner and the law regarding preservation of holy places and therefore they cannot be suspected of criminal actions due to this.”
Left-wing members of the Bennett government reacted angrily to the judicial ruling and demanded that it be “cancelled” by the government’s legal advisor. MK Issawi Fredj (Meretz) said that “one idiot is enough to burn an entire forest. In order to prevent the conflagration the government’s legal advisor and the state prosecutor must appeal the decision and request a delay in its implementation, before we find ourselves in a whirlpool of violence due to the crazed delusions of one judge.”
Police sources also criticized the ruling, saying it took Shabtai’s words “out of context’ and said he had not meant to encourage a change in the status quo on Temple Mount.
In the meantime, the government secretary responded to the ruling, stating that there was “no change to the status quo on Temple Mount. The decision of the court concerns the behavior of the minors arraigned in the court but is not a general ruling regarding freedom of worship on Temple Mount.
The government statement added that “With regard to the criminal case, the state will submit an appeal to the District Court.”
No comments:
Post a Comment