It didn't take long for those who will do anything to promote fake feminism, to start condemning Rabbi Chaim Walder, who has on the actual evidence available done more to help Israeli youth than almost anyone else. Contrast that with the wholly unproven allegations against Walder. For whatever Ms. Avigail Chizhik-Goldschmidt says, there is no such thing as evidence of alleged sexual assault. There is either evidence, which does not exist here or it would surely have been put in the public domain, or there are allegations. Here there is no evidence at all just a few allegations. Is a man's whole life's work going to be glibbly flushed down the toilet because some women make unsubstantiated allegations?
I wonder if the cockroach @3:51 would feel the same way if it had been his child that had been molested. Witness testimony is evidence. If this is not understandable by dreck such as yourself, some more Torah study is needed. Your moral compass is so skewed, you need to be prevented from breeding.
@Anonymous 9:15pm. I'm sorry but you sound off on this one. Although yes, a jury can decide to believe a witness testimony. But you're bringing feelings and false projections into the picture, which is a classic liberal low blow, "If I don't agree with your narrative then I don't care about your feelings" "What if it would have been your child" etc... Nobody is claiming that there wasn't a terrible thing that occured to the child the question is simply who is responsible, so he was pointing out that the whole allegation is based off just a testimony with no physical evidence, nobody said anything about whether or not something terrible happened to the kid..you got to argue the point of debate not low blows that sound cute.
It didn't take long for those who will do anything to promote fake feminism, to start condemning Rabbi Chaim Walder, who has on the actual evidence available done more to help Israeli youth than almost anyone else. Contrast that with the wholly unproven allegations against Walder. For whatever Ms. Avigail Chizhik-Goldschmidt says, there is no such thing as evidence of alleged sexual assault. There is either evidence, which does not exist here or it would surely have been put in the public domain, or there are allegations. Here there is no evidence at all just a few allegations. Is a man's whole life's work going to be glibbly flushed down the toilet because some women make unsubstantiated allegations?
ReplyDeleteI wonder if the cockroach @3:51 would feel the same way if it had been his child that had been molested.
ReplyDeleteWitness testimony is evidence.
If this is not understandable by dreck such as yourself, some more Torah study is needed. Your moral compass is so skewed, you need to be prevented from breeding.
@Anonymous 9:15pm.
DeleteI'm sorry but you sound off on this one.
Although yes, a jury can decide to believe a witness testimony.
But you're bringing feelings and false projections into the picture, which is a classic liberal low blow, "If I don't agree with your narrative then I don't care about your feelings" "What if it would have been your child" etc...
Nobody is claiming that there wasn't a terrible thing that occured to the child the question is simply who is responsible, so he was pointing out that the whole allegation is based off just a testimony with no physical evidence, nobody said anything about whether or not something terrible happened to the kid..you got to argue the point of debate not low blows that sound cute.
This is not testimony in court under oath, it's just allegations made to a muckraking newspaper.
ReplyDelete