The following photos were actually printed in The Jewish Observer, the Aguda Magazine...
But that was before the "gedoilim" were pressured by the pervert askanim, to disallow that!
But that was before the "gedoilim" were pressured by the pervert askanim, to disallow that!
 |
| Reb Moshe Feinstein posed with his wife and children |
 |
| Dessler Family Photograped with women Chas Ve'sholom |
oh my G-D he's acutally holding his kids while sitting next to his wife??? what is this world coming to??
ReplyDeleteLOL just kidding, ZECHER TZADDIK LIBRACHA
theyre soon gonna say that it's not really him or it can't be him bc he didn't have any kids.
ReplyDeleteAy ay ay in the famous picture of the Chofetz Chaim sitting in front of his house they photoshoped his wife out.
ReplyDeleteThere are many great pics of authentic Judaism. We must start a moisad lmaan haemes to preserve these pics and the truth they represent. We should also contact trainer studios and get all of the pics he has of what yiddishkeit used to look like before......
Please credit the source, and thereby bring a geulah to the world.
ReplyDelete1:15
ReplyDeleteI wrote the source .... The Jewish Observer
The source is really from the Feinstein and Desler Families .... all others just got it from others ... there is no need to publish a source of photos taken 100 years ago unless we know the photographer ... if we don't know the photographer there is absolutely no inyan of a "source"
ReplyDeleteEnough of all hyper-chumra tznius shtoos.
ReplyDeleteI'm off to watch another rerun of "My son the Schnorrer" on the Satmar cable channel.
Today's episode:
Channie Hindy decides to go off the derech when she is stopped for a tragic infraction and is arrested for official document tampering after her husband, Yerachmiel Yoilee, photoshopped her picture out of her drivers license because of tznius issues and she is forced to spend the night in a jail cell with a lesbian axe murderer.
Should be "traffic" infraction
Delete1:15
ReplyDeleteDIN doesnt need to write source ... someone Shmeggie copied and pasted the Jewish Observer to his own site ... so he has to mention the Smeggies site? Crazy ...
December 1, 2016 at 1:22 PM
ReplyDeleteshame on you
The thing is that we need new takanos nowadays because we are not as good at fighting our Yetzer's as people used to be. Even if we don't think they are necessary.........
ReplyDelete6:11 PM--You are right too many things that intice us, our yeitzer hora is overwhelmed, i suggest you and your hassidishe fools go and leave the big cities and live in the forests.
ReplyDelete1, I am not a chassid. 2, Jews do not believe in living away from others in order not to sin. (See the Alshich HaKadosh on Parshas Kedoshim, and story with the Rebbe Reb Meilech zt"l, etc.)
ReplyDeleteThese photos first appeared on the "SoMeHoW Frum" blog, then were facebooked by the YGB blog, then viralized by Harry, ending up on reddit.
ReplyDeleteHey, בבקשה, see this delicious post at that same somehowfrum blog bshem omro
ReplyDelete8:49
ReplyDeleteBshem Omro? ...He took it from The Jewish Observer, who took it from the Feinstein and Dessler families who got it from a photographer!
aishkodesh.
ReplyDeleteWe don't need more takonos, Chava made herself a takonoh not to touch the aytz hadas when no such takonoh existed, this takonoh led to eating.
Well, not really. See commentaries. Now, true, are too many takanos not proper for everyone? Yes. But there is also 'va'asu si'yag laTorah'. We have all learned Pirei Avos here, haven't we?
ReplyDeleteAlso, what is the difference now with this picture? Arent people allowed near their wives?
you answered your own question about pikei avos and si'yag la Torah. For Torah yes, not for nonsense, not when this never happened since photography was invented. this only began lately with this woman publisher of Hamodia and all others copied. I resent this si'yag, it's nonsense.
ReplyDeleteWhich si'yag?
ReplyDeleteabout omitting women in pics, cutting them out and these people guaranteed they keep family albums of their women at home. By cutting pics to make it look like mother and wives never existed in books and magazines.That's called sheker and geneivas das.
ReplyDeleteThat si'yag? Oh. Well, that one I do not find AS huge (though it obviously is not small or completely unnecessary).
ReplyDeleteStill, it's nothing to knock. But if the Gedolei Yisroel were OK with it, then it must not be as big....
It's everything to knock, it's BS, what do you mean if gedolei yisroel are good with it? This insanity never happened ever, no rabbi complained . Rabbis sat with their women at wedding and dinners and were photographed , what are you smoking?
ReplyDeleteYour Livish gedolim all sat with their wives, talked to other women, some whose wives didn't cover their hair, never were makpid on this nonsense, so don't tell us what about gedolei yisroel, tell it to the kids not to grownups, don't insult people with nonsense that never happened.
ReplyDeleteSo what's wrong with a new geder?
ReplyDeletenothing wrong, just make a geder a day and keep busy and productive.
ReplyDeletebecause peole won't listen to a new geder, same way you don't listen to a geder against the internet, everybody is like you.
ReplyDeleteOnly some people hold of a geder against the internet.
ReplyDelete