"Der Blatt" A Satmar Paper, Smudges the picture of Netanyahu!

This week as I do every week, I bought the Satmar Newspaper, Der Blatt.

 Every single week, all Satmar Newspapers, Dee Zeitung, Der Yid, and Der Blatt bombard their readers with hate against the State of Israel. Those who read Yiddish, will find their editorials and articles filled with vile & hateful stories against their fellow brothers and sisters. Their opinions are no different than what you read  in Al Jazirah, or what we read in the German Newspaper "Der Sturmer" during the Nazi era.

My dear readers, when we read this in the Arab Media we all shout Anti- Semitisim, so why is it that we allow these Jewish gangsters to fill their pages with Loshon Horah on a weekly basis? Why do we continue to fund their institutions when they pray for the downfall and the disappearance of the Jewish State, which would inevitably cause the annihilation of the Jewish People as we know it, G-D forbid? We all know that their schools breed generations of haters . 

Just last week I posted an article from their Web Site Jewsagainstzionism.comPlease see my post Dus Iz Nies

But this week, Der Blatt, took it to another level . They actually blotted out the picture of the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, but left in the picture of President Barak, a President  that wants Israel to commit suicide. Failedmessiah  reported it today and its imperative to let the Jewish People know what they are up against.

Here is a loose translation from a paragraph gleaned from their filthy newspaper, from page 57

"Professor" Netanyahu lectures Obama

Since Obama became the President and brought in his Liberal leanings in American politics, the State of Israel moved in the opposite direction leaning sharply to the right. Most Israeli citizens believe the false claims that Obama is a hidden Muslim , and nearly all of them believe the theory that whether Obama is a Muslim or not, he is ready to sell the State of Israel for a pot of lentils."

President Obama is convinced that the Arab World is ready for democracy, but that the State of Israel with its instigation against the Palestinians would rather be prepared for new war then a new peace."

Dus is Neis: This disgusting article continues to spew lies and hate against Netanyahu , while praising the President whose record so far with Israel is the worst since the creation of the State. In these few lines that I gleaned, there are no less than 3 blatant lies.

1. Netanyahu never lectured the President, he was actually very respectful, he pointed out that Israel cannot go back to the 67' borders because that would be indefensible. He also explained that Israel can never allow all the Arabs to return because that would in effect destroy the Jewish State as we know it. (This is something that both the Arabs and Satmar would agree would be a good thing) 
2. The Blatt wrote that "most Israeli citizens believe the false claims that Obama is a hidden Muslim, the truth is that only 39% of Israelis believe he is a Muslim : politico.com   By the way 24% of Americans believe that Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim Foxnews poll
3. The lying Blatt writes "State of Israel with its instigation against the Palestinians would rather be prepared for new war then a new peace." When did the State instigate anything against the Palestinians?  Which country would tolerate thousands of missiles flying in their heartlands? Which country would not want to protect their citizens from such an onslaught. How long would Satmar tolerate missiles flying into Williamsburg from Crown Heights? Years ago when the Lubavitchers sent Sheluchim into Williamsburg on Yom Tov, the Satmars beat the hell out of them.

As I have written may times before, how many Jews will become frum because of this article? So why are they backing Obama over Netanyahu?

Some bloggers have suggested that the reason Der Blatt smudged out the face of Netanyahu is because one should never look at the face of an Evil person, and since Netanyahu is "evil" they blotted his face out. But that is not true, because Der Blatt, and Dee Zeitung have published pictures of Hitler and Eichman and other evil pictures in the past.

My theory is very simple.... they must back Obama because he will keep them on the  programs, even at the expense of the Jewish People.

The Yiddish caption underneath the picture reads:

"The Media points out how Netanyahu turned his face away from President Obama, as one of the most undiplomatic photos in the history of diplomacy"

But these are the facts:

Netanyahu did not turn his face away from the President but was actually turning to face a reporter that was asking him a question, it was Obama who turned his face away showing his disinterest in the whole process. Der Blatt quotes from the Anti-Semitic Media, and makes it look like it was a fact.. What Chutzpah!

Read here what the media sympathetic to Israel actually wrote:

President Obama’s speech on the Middle East at the State Department last week, his icy glares at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office last Friday, his address before the AIPAC conference on Sunday, and his subsequent press briefings have all made clear that he is not sympathetically inclined toward Israel, nor does he consider Israel an ally worth defending.

Obama’s advocacy of the 1949 armistice lines as a starting point for negotiations demonstrate his lack of support for Israel’s right to defensible borders. His non-response to the Hamas-Fatah unity deal demonstrates that there is nothing the Palestinians can do that will make him accept the reality that their commitment to Israel’s destruction, rather than Israel’s continued control over Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria, is the reason there is no peace between them and Israel.

And yet, disturbingly, major Jewish American organizations took it upon themselves this past week to defend Obama to their members and to the general public. The most prominent example of this was the Anti-Defamation League’s press release following Obama’s State Department speech. After Obama endorsed the Palestinian position that negotiations must be based on the indefensible 1949 armistice lines, and did so in the face of explicit Israeli entreaties that he abstain from doing so, the ADL released a statement applauding Obama.

ADL leaders Abe Foxman and Robert Sugarman congratulated Obama for his support for Israel. Among other things, their statement said, “This Administration has come a long way in two years in terms of understanding of the nuances involved in bringing about Israeli-Palestinian peace and a better understanding of the realities and challenges confronting Israel.”

Why on earth did the ADL feel it necessary to defend the indefensible? Why, in the midst of an open fight between Obama and the Israeli government, did the ADL feel it necessary to side with Obama against the government of Israel?

In his speech before AIPAC on Sunday, Obama did not repudiate his attachment to the Palestinians’ negotiating position. He did not mention any objection to the Palestinian demand to overrun Israel with millions of foreign Arabs. He did not announce any steps the U.S. will take to end its support for the Hamas-controlled Palestinian Authority, despite the fact that continued funding is outlawed by U.S. terror finance laws.

Moreover, Obama’s speech to AIPAC included a barely-veiled threat against Israel when he asserted, “There is a reason why the Palestinians are pursuing their interests at the United Nations. They recognize that there is an impatience with the peace process – or the absence of one. Not just in the Arab world, but in Latin America, in Europe, and in Asia. That impatience is growing, and is already manifesting itself in capitols around the world.”